| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament | 2 | Immaculate Heart LM | Adam Torson |
|
| ||
| 2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament | 6 | Evanston Township AJ | Rebecca Kuang |
|
| ||
| 42nd University of Pennsylvania Tournament | 2 | Haverford WC | Ananth Panchanadam |
|
| ||
| 42nd University of Pennsylvania Tournament | 4 | Thomas Jefferson HSST AK | Kevin Wei |
|
| ||
| All | 1 | All | All |
|
| ||
| The Milo Cup at Millard North | 2 | JT Grachek | Lincoln North Star MA |
|
| ||
| The Milo Cup at Millard North | 5 | West Des Moines Valley KK | Zoe Hatfield |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Contact InfoTournament: All | Round: 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All | 12/20/16 |
1 - Framework v2Tournament: The Milo Cup at Millard North | Round: 5 | Opponent: West Des Moines Valley KK | Judge: Zoe Hatfield ‘Resolved’ reflects policy passage before a legislative body. Parcher 01 Reasons to Prefer: First, engagement: There are infinitely many non-topical affs–a precise and predictable point of difference is key to effective decision-making. Second, policy education: State action is inevitable–deliberation on policymaking is the only way to create social change in debate. Coverstone 05 Third, limits: Non-topical performances make the neg prep burden impossible—there are an infinite number of ways they can performatively address the topic—requiring them to defend topical action ensures a predictable lit base from which both debaters can effectively craft arguments—that’s key to clash and dialogue on every important issue—internal link turns their education and proves an independent fairness impact. Fourth, topical version of the aff is the resolutional policy justified by their performance. That solves 100 of their offense, and proves we can access all of their education through a narrow discussion of the topic–they can read the performance as a framework argument to justify a topical aff –there’s no reason voting off it is key. Vote neg—this debate is a comparison of methods—use your ballot to reject the 1AC and endorse the pedagogical value of topical debates about campus speech codes—the ballot is key to create better norms for debate because the 2NR is too late for me to generate offense to a topical affirmative. | 2/21/17 |
1 - Util Framework v1Tournament: 2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament | Round: 6 | Opponent: Evanston Township AJ | Judge: Rebecca Kuang Yudkowsky 08 | 2/21/17 |
1 - Util Framework v2Tournament: 42nd University of Pennsylvania Tournament | Round: 4 | Opponent: Thomas Jefferson HSST AK | Judge: Kevin Wei Yudkowsky 08 Thus, the standard is maximizing happiness. | 2/21/17 |
Jan-Feb-2017-Hate Speech NCTournament: The Milo Cup at Millard North | Round: 2 | Opponent: JT Grachek | Judge: Lincoln North Star MA BrainyQuote It is because I agree with former president Abraham Lincoln that no one’s freedom is more important than another’s, that I negate. Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. Framework: I value morality, as the word ‘ought’ in the resolution indicates a moral obligation. My value criterion is maintaining the equal balance of rights. No one group or individual, morally speaking, should be allowed to use their own rights to infringe on others’ rights. When rights conflict, a just society would use a balancing test to preserve values such as freedom, equality, and public safety. Daniels 2003 My thesis is that public colleges and universities in the United States ought to restrict constitutionally protected forms of hate speech. Contention 1 is Equal Participation: Hate speech on college campuses threatens the rights of targeted minority students. Ma 1995 And, no amount of discussion can ever discover truth when hate speech drives students off of campus and prevents dialogue from ever occurring. Gale 1991 And, the harms of hate speech are overlooked–empirics prove that dropout rates are high. Delgado 1996 Contention 2 is University Obligations: The primary obligation of colleges and universities is to create safe and equal access to education. Garrett 2002 Thus, public colleges and universities ought to regulate hate speech through law professor Jens Koepke’s two-pronged provisions of whether or not hate speech was intentional and whether it was directed at a specific audience. Koepke 1990 And, the intent requirement uses all available evidence and principles of criminal liability to prevent the vagueness and overbreadth of speech codes. Chen 1990 Therefore, because hate speech is an affront to the university’s purpose to foster an inclusive academic environment, I strongly urge a negative ballot and move on to the affirmative case. | 2/18/17 |
Jan-Feb-2017-Hate Speech PICTournament: 42nd University of Pennsylvania Tournament | Round: 2 | Opponent: Haverford WC | Judge: Ananth Panchanadam The counterplan solves the aff–it creates a precise test for balancing free speech with human dignity, which is key equality—reject the aff’s free speech absolutism. Catlin 14 And, the counterplan is key to full compliance to Article 20, which solves American hypocrisy and restores international human rights leadership. Catlin 14 | 2/14/17 |
Jan-Feb-2017-International Law DATournament: 42nd University of Pennsylvania Tournament | Round: 2 | Opponent: Haverford WC | Judge: Ananth Panchanadam Cohen 15 And, every U.S. violation of international law matters–U.S. violations cause other countries to break their commitments to international law. Koplow 13 And, U.S. commitment to international law preserves global follow-on—that solves multiple scenarios for extinction. Burroughs et al. 03 | 2/14/17 |
Jan-Feb-2017-Title IX DATournament: 42nd University of Pennsylvania Tournament | Round: 2 | Opponent: Haverford WC | Judge: Ananth Panchanadam Bernstein 03 And, federal funding is necessary to have financial aid resources for students. Urahn 15 And, disad turns case–without financial aid, low-income students of color will never get a college education–that means endless poverty. Flores 14 | 2/14/17 |
Nov-Dec-2016-Body-Worn Cameras CPTournament: 2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament | Round: 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart LM | Judge: Adam Torson Grewal 15 And, that solves case–body-worn cameras have empirically reduced police misconduct by holding police accountable through on-scene evidence. Grewal 15 | 1/29/17 |
Nov-Dec-2016-Crime DATournament: 2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament | Round: 2 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart LM | Judge: Adam Torson Sherter 15 And, limiting qualified immunity would deter police officers from properly enforcing the law–that increases crime. Rosen 05 And, crime has a huge impact on the economy–it hurts productivity, government budgets, and infrastructure. Erickson 10 And, statistical studies prove–economic decline leads to global nuclear war–that means extinction. Royal 10 | 1/29/17 |
Nov-Dec-2016-Extra Speaks PleaseTournament: 2016 Glenbrooks Speech and Debate Tournament | Round: 6 | Opponent: Evanston Township AJ | Judge: Rebecca Kuang Twigy 12 | 2/21/17 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|