Walt Whitman Xun Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronx | 4 | Stuyvesant PY | Agarwala, Varad |
|
| ||
| Valley | 1 | - | - |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
Bronx 4 ACTournament: Bronx | Round: 4 | Opponent: Stuyvesant PY | Judge: Agarwala, Varad RICHARDS 2 Linda Richards, “On Poisoned Ground.” The Chemical Heritage Foundation, Spring 2013. https://www.chemheritage.org/distillations/magazine/on-poisoned-ground Richards was the Chemical Heritage Foundation’s 2010–2011 Doan Fellow. She is researching nuclear and environmental justice history for a PhD at Oregon State University. This was not an isolated incident. Radioactive waste, power plants, and uranium mines are dangerous – that’s why they’re put on Native American lands. Exploitation by the nuclear industry occurs around the world. Australia has largest uranium reserves. Legislation protecting the original populations has been altered in favor of the mining industry. Part 2: Framing My advocacy is grief for the indigenous lives lost and harmed by nuclear power production. Affirm to grieve those killed and harmed by the production of nuclear power. Grief for these people brings them into our frame of reference and creates an ethical reorientation. The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater that challenges educational spaces through exposure to previously un-grievable bodies. I’ll clarify predictable terms of art, weighing, and links to avoid ambiguity and spec debates that crowd out focus on the 1AC, but neg has no stable strategy for aff prep, so it’s unreciprocal for me to meet an exhaustive burden. Lastly, CX checks all neg theory violations. I will make concessions given the stipulations above. To clarify: Grievability is a social status that signifies a life as having value, and is demonstrated when we grieve for those who have died or been injured. It’s impossible to specify further, since grief rituals are highly variable across time and space. Exposing us to previously un-grievable bodies in the context of nuclear power is offense under the role of the ballot—examples of args you can make include analyzing other nuclear disasters. We compare offense in terms of how well debaters contextualize the social conditions that render lives ungrievable, and explain how grief destabilizes those conditions. This role of the ballot is a prior condition to a new politics. Undergoing the radical exposure that triggers grief awakens accountability for the other, forming communities for resistance Traditional education mandates one “truth” as the only “truth.” Debate provides a unique tool to question authority and the very nature of our existence. The grieving of the aff breaks through that regulatory exclusion of radical proceduralism by acknowledging the cultural context and making mourning accessible to the public, reworked and revised for each community. And Role-Playing reduces debaters to spectators, eviscerating their agency as the competitive nature of debate creates a sense of detachment. The debate public takes on characteristics of a lab, barred from the external world. Grief is a key first step to solve – in spaces of failure and violence, grief does justice to the ungrieved and contains the potential for resistant political strategies in the real world. And debate rules posit an ‘ideal speech’ which necessarily excludes other forms of discourse—I can leverage the 1AC against arguments that exclude it. | 10/15/16 |
Valley AC 1Tournament: Valley | Round: 1 | Opponent: - | Judge: - Identities have a normative structure – every identity is governed by rules or norms. For example, to be a writer, one must meet the necessary conditions by writing. Identities are the product of social relations with others, so sufficient reasons must be found in relation to others. And, there is no way of apprehending how we might be changed through a relationship with the other—attempts to control the other destroy their otherness. Exposure to this absolute otherness is the precariousness of life, which reveals our dependence on others. Apprehending the precariousness of a life and sustaining the conditions of possibility of recognition necessitates life is grievable; i.e., its loss would matter. Thus, the role of the ballot is to endorse the advocacy that best renders lives grievable. Implications:
2. Practices that remove grief become norms through historical wrongs such as racism and patriarchy. The only way to rectify ungrievability stemming from historical racism is to carry out rectificatory justice. “Would it be in the least surprising, then, if the version of Rendering ungrievable lives grievable requires rectification of historical wrongs. Part 2 is Ungrievability The Native American lives lost to nuclear power have never been acknowledged, let alone grieved. The government targets the Navajo Nation for uranium mines. This was not an isolated incident – Native American communities are targeted as sites for all nuclear activity, since the risks are high. Exploitation by the nuclear industry occurs around the world. :20 Australia has largest uranium reserves. Legislation protecting the aboriginal populations has been altered in favor of the mining industry. I affirm that countries ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power. I reserve the right to clarify in CX on scope and implementation issues to deter silly bidirectional theory. Prohibition must be worldwide to ensure solvency. Nuclear power production must be banned worldwide, or else patterns of exploitation will continue – the industry will move to regions of other indigenous populations to escape regulation, and concentrate damages there, exacerbating the problem. Prohibition must be complete to alter the corporate norms that refuse to grieve for indigenous lives. Prohibiting nuclear power will render lives grievable by ensuring historical exploitation is stopped and recognizing the effect of nuclear power on indigenous populations. Underview Engagement with institutions is a consequence of our responsibility for ensuring the grievability of the lives of others, since otherwise I separate myself from the concrete others in front of me—controls the internal link to individual moral education, which outweighs since it concerns whether we’ll be able to create meaningful change in the lives we affect no matter what positions we hold. | 9/24/16 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|