Tournament: Samford | Round: 1 | Opponent: Multiple Rounds | Judge:
CP Text: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought to ban hate speech.
Competition: The counterplan is mutually exclusive to the aff.
Solvency: Other countries show this has worked.
Delgado 1999
Charles Inglis Thomson Professor of Law, University of Colorado and David Yun JD, University of Colorado, “The Neo-conservative Case Against Hate- Speech Regulation- Lively, D’souza, Gates, Carter, and the Toughlove Crowd,” 1999
Moreover, success is more ... the hate-speech movement.
NET BENEFITS:
First, hate speech harms minority groups, creating an inescapable structural violence towards those it oppresses.
Garrett 02
(Deanna Garrett, went to UVA and is at The University of Vermont – “Silenced Voices: Hate Speech Codes on Campus” - 2002)
Students at The University of Vermont ... person by another" (p. 70).
College students want speech codes that ban offensive speech
Griswold 16
(Writer for MediaIte – “Two-Thirds of College Students Support Banning ‘Intentionally Offensive’ Speech on Campus”
But a find … “upsetting or offensive.”
Speech codes that ban hate speech allow for better education for all groups
Posner 15
(Professor at the University of Chicago Law School, is author of The Twilight of International Human Rights Law). “Universities Are Right—and Within Their Rights—to Crack Down on Speech and Behavior.” Slate. 12 February 2015.
Teaching is tricky ... with different rules.