Tournament: ALL Jan-Feb | Round: 1 | Opponent: all | Judge: all
Hate speech actively excludes individuals from moral projects- inhibiting their ability to participate in moral discussions. Fish:
“But harms to… to live in.”
Fish, Stanley. "The Harm In Free Speech". Opinionator. N. p., 4 June 2012. Web. 14 Dec. 2016.

And, criticism of restrictions of hate-speech is rooted in victim-blaming ideology which perpetuates oppressive discourse. Fish:
“Some who take… its destructive aims.”
Fish, Stanley. "The Harm In Free Speech". Opinionator. N. p., 4 June 2012. Web. 14 Dec. 2016.

Tournament: ALL Jan-Feb | Round: 1 | Opponent: all | Judge: all
A. Revenge porn is propped up by free speech and considered constitutionally protected- court precedent proves.  Humbach:
“The inherent repulsiveness… or the speaker”
Humbach, John A. "The Constitution and Revenge Porn." Pace Law Review 35.1 (2015).

Revenge porn totalizes the identities of those targeted, defining them to the world and leaving them literally helpless to respond. Murray:

“One of the… this important issue”
Murray, Christine and Allison Crowe. “‘Revenge porn as a form of intimate partner violence.” See the Triumph, April 6, 2014. Web.

Tournament: ALL Jan-Feb | Round: 1 | Opponent: all | Judge: all
The criterion is consistency with innate moral sentiments.

First, our actions lack a representative quality, and thus actions can’t generate a contradiction with reason, only with sentiments. Cohon
“The third or… to Hume's project.”
Rachel Cohon (Albany). “Hume’s Moral Philosophy.” SEP (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-moral/). 2010.
Sexually explicit content distributed without the consent of those involved is propped up by free speech and considered constitutionally protected- court precedent proves. Humbach:
“The inherent repulsiveness… or the speaker”
Humbach, John A. "The Constitution and Revenge Porn." Pace Law Review 35.1 (2015).
And, sexually explicit content without consent totalizes the identities of those targeted, defining them to the world and leaving them literally helpless to respond. Murray:
“One of the… this important issue”

Murray, Christine and Allison Crowe. “‘Revenge porn as a form of intimate partner violence.” See the Triumph, April 6, 2014. Web.
And, the innate sentiment for sanctity of the human body is exemplified in how we judge actions, and sexual aspects amplify this sentiment. Haidt :
“Imagine that Meiwes… with their bodies”
Haidt, Jonathan. The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Random House LLC, 2013.

Tournament: ALL Jan-Feb | Round: 1 | Opponent: all | Judge: all
First, what is constitutive of an agent provides the needed context to determine what it means to be good or bad. Geach:
“There is no… good deer-stalker”
Geach, P. T. "Good and Evil." Analysis 17.2 (1956): 33-42. Web.

Second, constitutivism is inescapable and generates non-optional norms- means agents can’t escape constitutive duties. Katsafanas:
“So what’s special… practicality and queerness.”
Thus the standard is consistency with the constitutive nature of the agent of action. 

First, protected speech is subject to reasonable restriction in college classrooms for the purposes of education. The 11th Circuit of the US Court of Appeals notes:
“Nevertheless, a correct… an open forum”
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Bishop v. Aronov, 926 F.2d 1066, 1991. Ellipses in original.

Thus, colleges are contractually obligated to impose content-based restrictions. Russo:
“Students at both… standards of teaching.”
Russo, Charles. Handbook of Comparative Higher Education Law, RandL Education, 2013.

Tournament: ALL Jan-Feb | Round: 1 | Opponent: all | Judge: all
Ethical obligations derive from interactions among moral agents. Korsgard:
“The relations of… the other responsible”
Korsgard, Christine. “Creating the kingdom of ends: reciprocity and responsibility in personal relations.” Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 6, 1992, pp. 305-332.

Thus our ethical duties arise from mutually voluntary relations of reciprocity, and these agreements uniquely generate moral obligations. Gauthier:
“A contractarian theory… morally neutral, base.”
Gauthier, David (Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh). Morals by Agreement. (1986).

Thus the standard is consistency with contractual obligation. 

First, protected speech is subject to reasonable restriction in college classrooms for the purposes of education. The 11th Circuit of the US Court of Appeals notes:
“Nevertheless, a correct… an open forum”
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Bishop v. Aronov, 926 F.2d 1066, 1991. Ellipses in original.

Thus, colleges are contractually obligated to impose content-based restrictions. Russo:
“Students at both… standards of teaching.”
Russo, Charles. Handbook of Comparative Higher Education Law, RandL Education, 2013.

Black faculty authority is undermined— their right to govern the classroom is key. Fields:
“Strained relations with… destructive to morale.”
Fields, Cheryl. “A morale dilemma – black professors on white campuses – includes related article on mentorship programs for black faculty – Cover Story” June 23, 2007 Diverse Issues in Higher Education.

Tournament: ALL Jan-Feb | Round: 1 | Opponent: all | Judge: all
If we accept contradictory statements, language fails to make sense, making the resolution false. Lucas:
"But why should...become just babble"
J.R. Lucas Professor of Philosophy Emeritus, University of Oxford. Reason and Reality. Ria University Press, 2009. Print. *Gendered language modified*

It’s impossible to argue against non-contradiction, which is true a priori and stops infinite regress. Gottileb:
"Aristotle explains that... is similarly misguided"
Paula Gottileb Professor of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin Madison. “Aristotle on Non-contradiction.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 26 January 2011.

THUS, the standard is consistency with the epistemological principle of non-contradiction. 

“Protected speech” is by definition subject to restriction in pursuit of vital interests. Kairys:
"Speech is first...strict scrutiny’ standard"
Kairys, David. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. ReadHowYouWant.com, November 2010.

THIRD, free speech is not constitutionally protected for public colleges. This means that the aff terminates in contradiction because the 1st amendment is only applicable to Congress. Madison 91:
"Congress shall make...redress of grievances.”
Madison, James. Father of constitution, 4th president of the United States of America, Husband to Dolly Madison, bad tenant, let white house burn to the ground,  short, Notable Democratic-Republic. “US Constitution” 1st amendment. Constitution. 1791.

Tournament: ALL Jan-Feb | Round: 1 | Opponent: all | Judge: all
Interpretation: Any is defined as At all; in some degree (used for emphasis) (Oxford Dictionary) 

1) Field context – legal restrictions use any to refer to all. Black’s Law Dictionary:
"What is ABANDONMENT...to the child."
Black’s Law Dictionary, online legal dictionary, “Law Dictionary: What is ABANDONMENT OF CHILD?”

1) Any refers to all legally – context of flag burning proves. Danilina:
"Interesting that the...of the flag."
Danalina, S., staff writer for black’s law dictionary, “Is Flag Burning Illegal?” 

Standards:
1) Limits
2) Textuality

Tournament: ALL Jan-Feb | Round: 1 | Opponent: all | Judge: all
A: On the January-February 2017 topic the affirmative may not defend restricting or maintaining restrictions of any speech outside of that which is not explicitly labeled as not protected by the supreme court. To clarify, the aff may not defend only the removal of free speech zones.

Standards:

1) Textuality

“Protected speech” is subject to restriction in pursuit of vital interests. Kairys:
"Speech is first...strict scrutiny’ standard"
Kairys, David. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. ReadHowYouWant.com, November 2010.

2) Ground

Tournament: ALL Jan-Feb | Round: 1 | Opponent: all | Judge: all
On the Jan-Feb 2017 LD topic the affirmative must defend that public colleges and universities not restrict any form of constitutionally protected speech in any way, i.e. they can’t affirm by arguing against only one form of speech restriction.

Standards:

1) semantic accuracy

2) ground quality

3) predictability