Valley Gilbert Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALL NOVDEC | 1 | ALL | ALL |
|
|
| |
| ALL SEPTOCT | 1 | Valley EM |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| ALL NOVDEC | 1 | Opponent: ALL | Judge: ALL These are all aff cites from NovemberDecember being read by myself and others |
| ALL SEPTOCT | 1 | Opponent: Valley EM | Judge: These are cites on the aff that are being read by myself and most of my teammates |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
Jan-Feb AC 10Tournament: ALL Jan-Feb | Round: 1 | Opponent: all | Judge: all The language in Tinker v. Des Moines clarifies that “protected speech” loses its protection when circumstances arise that subject it to restriction. Only their own internal evaluation of what the cede as epistemically true can do anything. No impact turns Outweigh. Linguistic relativity and linguistic determinism determines a key sphere of languages’ functionality. Further, silencing of some language excludes the capacity of some individuals to form an identity and seek truths themselves. | 4/29/17 |
Jan-Feb AC 7Tournament: ALL Jan-Feb | Round: 1 | Opponent: all | Judge: all "In 2002 scientists...the science experiments." | 4/29/17 |
Jan-Feb AC 8Tournament: ALL Jan-Feb | Round: 1 | Opponent: all | Judge: all Mutual recognition of the spirit of others within a social order is necessary to reconcile conflicting conceptions of the self to form an identity. If I were to close a door, I would not know if it had made a noise unless others reacted as well. Actualization of individuals can only occur by placing them within society – the person alone is an incomplete picture of the subject I contend that unrestricted public expression of unfiltered opinion is prereq to the establishment of an ethical community. Aff solves best. Destroying identity construction in the community. | 4/29/17 |
Jan-Feb AC 9Tournament: ALL Jan-Feb | Round: 1 | Opponent: all | Judge: all Actions are either steps toward an end or random motions. The ends of particular action classes are determined by the practices within which those practices take place. A state is a creature of its constitution, and it is literally impossible for a state to act outside the constraints of its constituting documents because when state agents do so they are not, by law, acting as the state. The U.S. Constitution is nearly unique in the degree and duration of universal acceptance among those under its jurisdiction. Since ethical obligation is a judgment of choice, adjudicating as unethical the failure to make a choice one is incapable of making renders ethical judgment meaningless. Agents of the U.S. government are literally incapable of enacting enduring policies in violation of settled constitutional law because the structure of the legislative and judicial branches prevents it. Constitutional jurisprudence implicitly recognizes that public college and university employees are agents of the state. The Supreme Court has ruled explicitly that this is the case. | 4/29/17 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|