Southlake Carroll Mohsin Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arlington | 1 | All Saints Epispocal | idk |
|
| ||
| Byron Nelson | 1 | Jasper | Shane Olsen |
|
|
| |
| Conrad | 1 | Grapevine TS | Dan Rowe |
|
|
| |
| Contact | 9 | Contact | Contact |
|
|
| |
| Newman Smith | 1 | Marcus DK | Nathan Sims |
|
|
| |
| Sunvite | 4 | Boca Raton NM | Nathan Johnston |
|
|
| |
| UT Austin | 2 | Katy Taylor CR | Kyle Fennesy |
|
|
| |
| Yale | 1 | Randolph AP | Diganta Rashed |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Byron Nelson | 1 | Opponent: Jasper | Judge: Shane Olsen 1AC-Excessive force |
| Conrad | 1 | Opponent: Grapevine TS | Judge: Dan Rowe 1NC-nuclear phase out |
| Contact | 9 | Opponent: Contact | Judge: Contact Contact |
| Newman Smith | 1 | Opponent: Marcus DK | Judge: Nathan Sims 1AC-Prolif |
| Sunvite | 4 | Opponent: Boca Raton NM | Judge: Nathan Johnston 1ac-this |
| UT Austin | 2 | Opponent: Katy Taylor CR | Judge: Kyle Fennesy 1AC-this |
| Yale | 1 | Opponent: Randolph AP | Judge: Diganta Rashed 1AC-Experiments |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
ContactTournament: Contact | Round: 9 | Opponent: Contact | Judge: Contact | 8/29/16 |
JANFEB-Aff Alt-RightTournament: Sunvite | Round: 4 | Opponent: Boca Raton NM | Judge: Nathan Johnston 1ACFramingThe alt-right is back and stronger than ever—students are already engaging in hate speech and harmful dialogue and are being recruited now on college campuses for white nationalist movements.Harkinson 16, Josh. "The Push to Enlist "Alt-Right" Recruits on College Campuses." Mother Jones. N.p., 6 Dec. 2016. Web. 06 Jan. 2017. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/12/richard-spencer-alt-right-college-activism. SM Education on resisting oppression is key to raising a class of radical students willing to alter the material conditions of oppression through democratic policy actionsGiroux 15 (Henry, American scholar and cultural critic. One of the founding theorists of critical pedagogy in the United States, he is best known for his pioneering work in public pedagogy, "Higher Education and the Promise of Insurgent Public Memory," March 3, 2015, http://truth-out.org/news/item/29396-higher-education-and-the-promise-of-insurgent-public-memory) Only through a racial realism approach and policy action can real world change that has the end result of empowering the oppressed occurBell 92 (Derrick Bell, 1992, Conneticut Law Review, http://liberalarts.iupui.edu/mpsg/Essays/Bell20-20Racial20Realism.pdf,) AP While implementing Racial Realism we must simultaneously ac- knowledge that our actions are not likely to lead to transcendent change and, despite our best efforts, may be of more help to the system we despise than to the victims of that system we are trying to help. Nevertheless, our realization, and the dedication based on that realiza- tion, can lead to policy positions and campaigns that are less likely to worsen conditions for those we are trying to help, and will be more likely to remind those in power that there are imaginative, unabashed risk-takers who refuse to be trammeled upon. Yet confrontation with our oppressors is not our sole reason for engaging in Racial Realism. Continued struggle can bring about unexpected benefits and gains that in themselves justify continued endeavor. The fight in itself has mean- ing and should give us hope for the future. I am convinced that there is something real out there in America for black people. It is not, however, the romantic love of integration. It is surely not the long-sought goal of equality under law, though we must maintain the struggle against racism else the erosion of black rights will become even worse than it is now. The Racial Realism that we must seek is simply a hard-eyed view of racism as it is and our subordinate role in it. We must realize, as our slave forebears, that the struggle for freedom is, at bottom, a manifestation of our humanity that survives and grows stronger through resistance to oppression, even if that oppression is never overcome. I am convinced that there is something real out there in America for black people. It is not, however, the romantic love of integration. It is surely not the long-sought goal of equality under law, though we must maintain the struggle against racism else the erosion of black rights will become even worse than it is now. The Racial Realism that we must seek is simply a hard-eyed view of racism as it is and our subordinate role in it. We must realize, as our slave forebears, that the struggle for freedom is, at bottom, a manifestation of our humanity that survives and grows stronger through resistance to oppression, even if that oppression is never overcome.Thus the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best upholds a racial realistic perspective and engages in policy actionInstead of abstracting and ignoring oppression through ideal theory we should focus on concrete solutions to fight itCurry 14 (Dr. Tommy J. Curry, "The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century", Victory Briefs, 2014) HarmsFree speech is as tight as a pin on college campuses—this limits productive dialogue that can foster new ideas and goes against the true purpose of higher level educationMaloney 16, Cliff, Jr (He is a graduate of the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown, Class of 2014, with a B.A. in Education and a B.S. in Theatre Arts.) . "Colleges Have No Right to Limit Students' Free Speech." Time. Time, Oct.-Nov. 2016. Web. 04 Jan. 2017. http://time.com/4530197/college-free-speech-zone/. Speech codes increase racial tensions, cause backlash, and drive racist thought underground to where we can't fight itHerron 93, Vince. "Increasing the Speech: Diversity, Campus Speech Codes, and the Pursuit of Truth." S. Cal. L. Rev. 67 (1993): 407. SM Speech restrictions are white paternalism under the guise of protecting vulnerable minorities—they discount the effectiveness of marginalized groups historically successful use of free speechO'Neill 15, Brendan. "Freedom of Speech Is the Best Friend Marginalised Groups Could Ever Have." Freedom of Speech Is the Best Friend Marginalised... N.p., 20 Mar. 2015. Web. 08 Jan. 2017. http://brendanoneill.co.uk/post/114125942824/freedom-of-speech-is-the-best-friend-marginalised. SM This has given rise to the alt-right movements it hopes to contain and prevents agonistic deliberation of ideasCarle 16, Robert. "How The American Academy Helped Create The Alt-Right." The Federalist. N.p., 22 Dec. 2016. Web. 06 Jan. 2017. http://thefederalist.com/2016/12/22/american-academy-helped-create-alt-right/. SM SolvencyThe aff is uniquely key to raising the next generation of critical intellectuals—non uniques the KNapolitano 16, Janet (an American politician, lawyer, and university administrator who served as the 21st Governor of Arizona from 2003 to 2009 and United States Secretary of Homeland Security from 2009 to 2013, under President Barack Obama. She has been president of the University of California system since September 2013, shortly after she resigned as Secretary of Homeland Security.) . "It's Time to Free Speech on Campus Again." BostonGlobe.com. N.p., 02 Oct. 2016. Web. 04 Jan. 2017. https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/10/01/time-free-speech-campus-again/v5jDCzjuv710Mc92AhaAqL/story.html. SM Racists exposing themselves spurs counterspeech which creates activism on campus that constructs solutions and exposes the moral bankruptcy of their viewsCalleros 95, Charles R. "Paternalism, Counterspeech, and Campus Hate-Speech Codes: A Reply to Delgado and Yun." Ariz. St. LJ 27 (1995): 1249. SM K Underview 1:30====Critique is useless without a concrete alternative to solve it==== We're state as a heuristic not state good-that distinction matters and allows us to work within the state while learning how to critique it. The latter approach teaches approaches that fail and prop up liberalismZanotti '14 Dr. Laura Zanotti is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Virginia Tech. Her research and teaching include critical political theory as well as international organizations, UN peacekeeping, democratization and the role of NGOs in post-conflict governance."Governmentality, Ontology, Methodology: Re-thinking Political Agency in the Global World" – Alternatives: Global, Local, Political – vol 38(4):p. 288-304,. A little unclear if this is late 2013 or early 2014 – The Stated "Version of Record" is Feb 20, 2014, but was originally published online on December 30th, 2013. Obtained via Sage Database. SM | 1/17/17 |
NOVDEC-Aff Excessive ForceTournament: Byron Nelson | Round: 1 | Opponent: Jasper | Judge: Shane Olsen FrameworkI value morality since ought implies a moral obligationWe morally exclude people based on arbitrarily perceived differences—structural violence is rooted in this exclusionWinter, Deborah Du Nann, and Dana C. Leighton. "STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE." Peace, Conflict, and Violence: Peace Psychology for the 21st Century. (1999):. Print. ~Don't worry I re-cut it~ Thus the standard is reducing structural violence—Three additional warrants for the standard:1~ Eliminating Structural violence is a prerequisite to all other actions-all actions must challenge and change the way we view structural violence and oppressionTaylor Janelle S. "Explaining Difference: "Culture," "Structural Violence," and Medical Anthropology." Office of Minority Affairs Diversity. University of Washington. Web. 28 Mar. 2016. This means the Aff framing is a pre-requisite to any other moral framework—"out-groups" will never be noticed and included in our moral discussions, so we need to eliminate structural barriers first to ensure a seat for all2~ Ideal theory abstracts from the real world and legitimizes its oppression—prefer non-ideal theory which is key to recognizing and solving oppressive power structuresMills 05, Charles W (Mills is presently John Evans Professor of Moral and Intellectual Philosophy at Northwestern University, He is known for his work in social and political philosophy, particularly in oppositional political theory as centered on class, gender, and race.). ""Ideal theory" as ideology." Hypatia 20.3 (2005): 165-183. 3~ Challenging institutional racism comes first—it makes violence inevitable which turns their util first argsAlbert Memmi 2k, Professor Emeritus of Sociology @ U of Paris, Naiteire, Racism, Translated by Steve Martinot, p. 163-165 HarmsVague and inconsistent definitions of reasonable in the context of qualified immunity allow police to get away with excessive uses of forceAlpert and Smith 94, Geoffrey P (Geoffrey Philip Alpert is a professor in the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of South Carolina), and William C. Smith (Professor at University of South Carolina). "How reasonable is the reasonable man?: Police and excessive force." The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-) 85.2 (1994): 481-501. SM It's no secret that police brutality is extremely racistChaney and Ray 13, Cassandra (Has a PhD and is a professor at LSU. Also has a strong focus in the structure of Black families) , and Ray V. Robertson (Also has a PhD and is a criminal justice professor at LSU). "Racism and police brutality in America." Journal of African American Studies 17.4 (2013): 480-505. SMdo I really need a card for this And more unjustified arrest warrants exacerbate the problem of mass incarceration, which is racist and destroys race relationsPaul Butler, law professor, Georgetown,2009, Let's Get Free: A Hip Hop Theory of Justice, Kindle Edition, page number at end of card Qualified immunity prevents its victims from seeking justice ensuring the voices of the oppressed are kept silent—it's try or die for the affRudovsky 2, David (He is a founding partner of the law firm of Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing, and Feinberg ~1~, and a Senior Fellow at University of Pennsylvania Law School, where he teaches evidence and constitutional criminal procedure.) . "Police abuse: can the violence be contained." Harv. CR-CLL Rev. 27 (1992): 465. SM PlanThus, the plan: The United States ought to limit qualified immunity of police officers in excessive force cases by removing it as a pre-trial defense and allowing the judge to determine the reasonability question.Sheng 12, Philip. "Objectivity Reasonable Criticism of the Doctrine of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases Brought under 42 USC Sec. 1983, An." BYU J. Pub. L. 26 (2012): 99. SM And we're not extra-T, Analytic Also, no eliminate-T—Analytic SolvencyPolice care about their perception, the aff ensures they know what "reasonable person's" use of force is, so they act within those confinesAlpert and Smith 94, Geoffrey P (Geoffrey Philip Alpert is a professor in the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of South Carolina), and William C. Smith (Professor at University of South Carolina). "How reasonable is the reasonable man?: Police and excessive force." The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-) 85.2 (1994): 481-501. SM ====Reforming qualified immunity is the best starting point—a lack of police accountability is what the aff fixes ==== And federal reforms are uniquely needed to solveRudovsky 4, David (He is a founding partner of the law firm of Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing, and Feinberg ~1~, and a Senior Fellow at University of Pennsylvania Law School, where he teaches evidence and constitutional criminal procedure.) . "Police abuse: can the violence be contained." Harv. CR-CLL Rev. 27 (1992): 465. SM UnderviewFirst, aff's should be able to spec how they limit qualified immunity if they have a solvency advocateAnalytic Put those rule of law DAs away—racial targeting justified by qualified immunity kills public faith in the lawDe Stefan 17, Lindsey (Editor for the Seton Hall Law Review). ""No Man Is Above the Law and No Man Is Below It:" How Qualified Immunity Reform Could Create Accountability and Curb Widespread Police Misconduct." (2017). SM Role-playing teaches students to be comfortable with the language of power which is critical to genuine and effective political activism – personal experiences must be tied to concrete political strategies to avoid cooptationCoverstone, 05 – masters in communication from Wake Forest and longtime debate coach | 11/10/16 |
NOVDEC-Aff Model MinorityTournament: UT Austin | Round: 2 | Opponent: Katy Taylor CR | Judge: Kyle Fennesy Part One is FramingMy interpretation is that the resolution should serve as a topic area which we as debaters should have a discussion in relating to it and the debate is about competing methodologies or approaches to our respective areas. This isn't a topicality bad argument, but rather an argument that we shouldn't be locked to generic QI good or bad debates, but rather the way in which it relates to larger structural and power forces that shape our lives as actual people. This legal topic is unique in that it has allowed me to recognize the unique place that I fit into and interact with all aspects of society.Thus, role of the judge is to act as a critical educator combating oppression—while obviously signing the ballot won't make neoliberalism disappear, voting for strategies to combat oppression in this round makes us better activists in the future.Giroux 13 (Henry, American scholar and cultural critic. One of the founding theorists of critical pedagogy in the United States, he is best known for his pioneering work in public pedagogy, "Public Intellectuals Against the Neoliberal University," 29 October 2013, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/19654-public-intellectuals-against-the-neoliberal-university)//ghs-VA Best for activism— Talking about methodologies to combat oppressive structures makes us better advocates in the future—this is a key pre-requisite to education and fairness claims, even if we learn from debate, that education is useless without the ability to put it to use.And, my approach to the topic has led me to question and research the role Asians Americans play as the model minority, thusROB: : Endorse the debater who best deconstructs the myth of the model minority as way to resist white supremacyPunongbayan 15 (10/02/2015 "What Asian Americans Owe African Americans" Christopher Punongbayan is Advisor and former Executive Director of the oldest Asian American legal civil rights organization in the country, Advancing Justice - Asian Law Caucus. JC)The untold story is that Asian America is what it is today because of the African American-led civil rights movement. The first step that we can do to bridge the distance among communities of color is understand our interconnected roots. The 1960s is perhaps best known for laws like the Civil Rights Act. But 50 years ago today, on October 3, 1965, the Immigration and Nationality Act was also passed in the midst of the social upheaval of that period. This immigration law has been absolutely transformational for American society because of the drastic demographic shifts that were brought about in its wake. From 1820 to 1965, only 1.5 million Asians immigrated to the US. After 1965's immigration act, more than 10 million Asians have immigrated to our shores. Were it not for the centuries-long struggle led by African Americans on behalf of all excluded communities, we as a nation would not only have a lot fewer civil rights, we would not have nearly the racial diversity we do today. The Asian American community, nineteen million of us strong, could be the tipping point that shifts the balance of power against white supremacy. But what's more, we Asian Americans must challenge the anti-black racism that exists in our own community. In 2015, when police brutality is a daily news headline and African Americans are senselessly murdered by law enforcement, Asian Americans must stand as allies to the Black Lives Matter movement. Black lives matter unconditionally. We Asian Americans owe it to African Americans to hold ourselves accountable to this undeniable truth. My argument isn't that you should prioritize Asian suffering on the flow, but rather to endorse the best method that reveals the role of Asian American life in a society framed by white supremacy but I'll get to that later…Part two is the policeThis topic is motivated by concerns of growing police brutality, many authors in the topic lit are concerned with how limiting QI can change this and better societyWright 15 Shows First the notion of qualified immunity begs the question of why we even need to limit it for police officers. My arguments is that the question of limiting demands a question of our understanding of the way the police work. You've surely heard of the Black Lives Matter movement and its protests against police brutality against African Americans, but another minority is also subject to these unique structural harms—The Model Minority, The Asian American. We need a total re-understanding of the way policing works and the laws that allow it to do so to create any changeZhang 13 (Policy Memo Anti Asian American Discrimination https://asianamericansandpolicemisconduct.wordpress.com/2013/11/13/policy-memo-anti-asian-american-discrimination/~~#comments JC) The model minority myth was a construct created by white society to make the people of color complacent. This racial engineering pitted the Asian American community against the African American which ignores the systematic violence against the Asian community.Linshi 14 ("Why Ferguson Should Matter to Asian-Americans "http://time.com/3606900/ferguson-asian-americans/ JC) THE MODEL MINORITY MYTH SILENCES US IN SOCIETY—IT TELLS US TO STAY COMPLACENT AND BE USED AS A TOOL AGAINST THE BLACK BODYWe are missing in history, but it is only by changing the narrative can we reshape history and actually provide a space to live.Nguyen 15 ("Missing in History" and Why It Matters by Phuong Nguyen" The Ithaca Pan Asian American Film Festival is dedicated to supporting Asian American film, video and media makers both nationwide and throughout the upstate New York area while promoting films created by, starring, and/or about Asian Americans. https://panasianamericanfilm.org/2015/03/19/missing-in-history-and-why-it-matters-by-phuong-nguyen/) JC This means that the debate space is uniquely key to getting my voice heard, as squo options and traditional social movements fail due to ther focus on police brutality as a black and white issue—this is why we need a focus on the Model Minority and the avenues it can open for and intersectional approachPart three is the resistanceThe speech act of the 1AC is a form of conscientization that breaks down the Model Minority myth through limiting qualified immunity as a method of holding white supremacy accountable for Asian racismWe often competitively participate in debate without ever considering the possibility for how debate can CHANGE the world – how the critical thinking and research skills we develop can provide MEANING and advance methodologies to liberate oppressed people often within our social location. – Our speech act focuses on the EPISTEMOLOGICAL GROWTH occurring from the activity and the development of critical consciousness –Debate becomes more than a game but a process of life leading to CONSCIENTIZATIONOsajima '7 1 2007, Keith Osajima is a professor and Director of the Race and Ethnic Studies Program at the University of Redlands. REPLENISHING THE RANKS: Raising Critical Consciousness Among Asian Americans; JOURNAL OF ASIAN AMERICAN STUDIES (JAAS), February, Volume 10, No. 1; p. 64 JC/SM 3 This is not just being conscious of our location on the social hierarchy but also how our location interacts with others and is affected by others as wellMy method is conscientization – a process of constant clarification that allows us to name the world and perceive how we exist in it – through this dynamic process we have come to realizations – like the fact that there could be derogatory language within the discourse of our 1AC authors which we have made a conscious attempt to remove – we have already begun and will continue to create real changeOsajima '7 2 2007, Keith Osajima is a professor and Director of the Race and Ethnic Studies Program at the University of Redlands. REPLENISHING THE RANKS: Raising Critical Consciousness Among Asian Americans; JOURNAL OF ASIAN AMERICAN STUDIES (JAAS), February, Volume 10, No. 1; p. 64 JC/SM 3 Our performance is critical – debate has elements that contribute to conscientization that must be embraced for effective changeOsajima '7 3 2007, Keith Osajima is a professor and Director of the Race and Ethnic Studies Program at the University of Redlands. REPLENISHING THE RANKS: Raising Critical Consciousness Among Asian Americans; JOURNAL OF ASIAN AMERICAN STUDIES (JAAS), February, Volume 10, No. 1; p. 64 JC/SM 3 | 12/3/16 |
SEPOCT-Aff ExperimentsTournament: Yale | Round: 1 | Opponent: Randolph AP | Judge: Diganta Rashed I affirm:Part One is FrameworkI value morality since "ought" implies a moral obligationMoral theories must be able to accommodate indisputable metaphysical facts—such as the separateness of persons. People occupy separate and unique perspectives in the world. My mental states are mine alone, and cannot be weighed from person to person.Nagel 74 , Thomas ~Princeton Philosopher~. "What is it Like to be a Bat?" Duke University Press, 1974. This rules out moral theories that rely on weighing impacts between people for two reasons:First, the separateness of persons makes aggregation nonsensical since combining disparate experiences is impossible. Ten headaches don't equal one migraine since there is no way to experience the collective pain of ten people.Second, aggregative moral theories are normatively wrong since they disrespect the individual worth of persons.Nozick, Robert ~Harvard philosopher~. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Instead, prefer a moral theory that recognizes the right inherent in each individual to govern over herself.Quinn 89 ACTIONS, INTENTIONS, AND CONSEQUENCES: THE DOCTRINE OF DOING AND ALLOWING' The Philosophical Review, Vol. XCVIII, No. 3 (July 1989) ~Modified for gendered language.~ The standard is respecting people as ends-in-themselves. To clarify, nuclear power is wrong if it sacrifices some for the sake of others.I defend the resolution as a general principle—if the neg wants something different they should ask first; let's avoid frivolous theory and topicality.Part Two is the Drawing BoardDespite assurances from experts that nuclear disasters are astronomically unlikely, Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, and Fukushima are evidence that the probability of nuclear accidents defies calculation. Three warrants why nuclear safety is inherently incalculable:First, there are an un-measurable amount of things that could go wrong or happen to nuclear plants—calculations ignore the vast majority of theseDowner 1, John (Ph.D. Science and Technology Studies, Cornell University 2007. Research Officer, London School of Economics' ESRC Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation (CARR) 2007-9; Lecturer in Science Technology and Society, and Fellow: Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC); Stanford University 2009-20012. Lecturer in Risk and Reslience, Bristol, SPAIS, since 2012.). "3 The unknowable ceilings of safety: three ways that nuclear accidents escape the calculus of risk assessments." The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice, and Democracy in the post-Fukushima Era (2015): 35. SM Second, accidents are inevitable in highly complex systems—a more complex system opens up more room for small mishaps to influence each other and link together to cause accidents or meltdownsDowner 2, John (Ph.D. Science and Technology Studies, Cornell University 2007. Research Officer, London School of Economics' ESRC Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation (CARR) 2007-9; Lecturer in Science Technology and Society, and Fellow: Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC); Stanford University 2009-20012. Lecturer in Risk and Reslience, Bristol, SPAIS, since 2012.). "3 The unknowable ceilings of safety: three ways that nuclear accidents escape the calculus of risk assessments." The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice, and Democracy in the post-Fukushima Era (2015): 35. SM Third, risk calculations are heavily based on theoretical models—empirical observation is impossible due to the large variety of reactors, making reliability assessments of nuclear power plants extremely inaccurateDowner 3, John (Ph.D. Science and Technology Studies, Cornell University 2007. Research Officer, London School of Economics' ESRC Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation (CARR) 2007-9; Lecturer in Science Technology and Society, and Fellow: Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC); Stanford University 2009-20012. Lecturer in Risk and Reslience, Bristol, SPAIS, since 2012.). "3 The unknowable ceilings of safety: three ways that nuclear accidents escape the calculus of risk assessments." The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice, and Democracy in the post-Fukushima Era (2015): 35. SM Part Three is the ExperimentThe fact that nuclear power involves incalculable risks makes its use in society a social experiment where experts implement technology to find out how it will workVan de Poel 11, Ibo (Ibo van de Poel is Antoni van Leeuwenhoek professor at TU Delft; an exclusive professorship for excellent young researchers. He is an internationally leading scholar in Design for Values, responbility issues in engineering, and in technology as a form of social experimentation.) . "Nuclear energy as a social experiment." Ethics, Policy and Environment 14.3 (2011): 285-290. SM This has 3 impacts:Nuclear power uses people as a means to an end. As a social experiment, the innocent people exposed to the risks of nuclear disaster are the human subjects. Even if nuclear power ends up being a useful tool for providing clean energy, the only way to achieve that goal is to test it on innocent people. This makes it immoral—And, even if people never end up being harmed, its wrong to expose them to immoral risksInformed consent—Experimentation must never violate a subject's informed consent. Three warrants.Eyal 12, Nir, "Informed Consent", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Three ways nuclear power violates informed consent:First, even if there is consent for nuclear power, its not informed—experts deliberately assert probability calculations of nuclear safety despite the fact that they're inherently flawedDowner 4, John (Ph.D. Science and Technology Studies, Cornell University 2007. Research Officer, London School of Economics' ESRC Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation (CARR) 2007-9; Lecturer in Science Technology and Society, and Fellow: Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC); Stanford University 2009-20012. Lecturer in Risk and Reslience, Bristol, SPAIS, since 2012.). "3 The unknowable ceilings of safety: three ways that nuclear accidents escape the calculus of risk assessments." The Ethics of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice, and Democracy in the post-Fukushima Era (2015): 35. SM Second, there's no consent—people are generally against nuclear powerBlack 11, Richard. "Nuclear Power 'gets Little Public Support Worldwide'" BBC News. N.p., 25 Nov. 2011. Web. 12 Sept. 2016. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-15864806. Third, there could be no consent—nuclear power is inherently undemocratic and fosters elitism.Davis 07', Tracy C. Stages of Emergency: Cold War nuclear civil defense. Duke University Press, 2007. Experiments are immoral when they harm their subjects. Nuclear power does this: it exploits Indigenous peoples.Lopez 04 , Bayley. "Radioactive Reservation: The Uphill Battle to Keep Nuclear Waste Off Native American Land." Nuclear Age Peace Foundation. N.p., 02 Sept. 2004. Web. 29 Aug. 2016. https://www.wagingpeace.org/radioactive-reservation-the-uphill-battle-to-keep-nuclear-waste-off-native-american-land/. | 9/17/16 |
SEPOCT-Aff ProlifTournament: Newman Smith | Round: 1 | Opponent: Marcus DK | Judge: Nathan Sims 1ACFramingI value morality since ought implies a moral obligationThe standard is maximizing expected well-beingExtinction outweighs – its irreversibleBostrum 12 (Nick, Professor of Philosophy at Oxford, directs Oxford's Future of Humanity Institute and winner of the Gannon Award, Interview with Ross Andersen, correspondent at The Atlantic, 3/6, "We're Underestimating the Risk of Human Extinction", http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/03/were-underestimating-the-risk-of-human-extinction/253821/) Util is best for policy making and role playing the government—The impossibility to attain knowledge of every outcome or abuse leaves util as the only option for most rational decision-makingGoodin 95 – Professor of Philosophy at the Research School of the Social Sciences at the Australian National University (Robert E., Cambridge University Press, "Utilitarianism As a Public Philosophy" pg 63) InherencyCorporate propaganda continues to push the "so-called" benefits of nuclear in order to shut out deliberation and progress in greener alternatives – be skeptical of their offenseWasserman 16 The Nuclear Renaissance increases the risk of prolif—ensures that new nuclear energy spreads to non-state actorsBozzo, 16 The current NPT is loosing cred and legitimacy- non-nuclear states feel unequally obligated while nuclear powers maintain their weaponsTannenwald, Faculty Fellow at the Watson Institute for International Studies, 2013 The NPT can't prevent the spread of weapons—ensures prolif will continueWesley, 2006 Advantage 1: New StatesPut those prolif good turns away—prolif in new states uniquely causes conflictKroenig 14 – Matthew, Associate Professor and International Relations Field Chair at Georgetown University, and Nonresident Senior Fellow in the Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security at The Atlantic Council ("The History of Proliferation Optimism: Does It Have A Future?", April 2014, http://www.matthewkroenig.com/The20History20of20Proliferation20Optimism_Feb2014.pdf) Nuclear war makes the world go boomCHALKO 2003 (Dr. Tom J., MSc., Ph.D., Head of Geophysics Research, Scientific E Research P/L, "Can a Neutron Bomb Accelerate Global Volcanic Activity?" http://sci-e-research.com/neutron_bomb.html) Advantage 2: Asia====Pakistan nuclear creates small nuclear strikes on India drawing in multiple actors.==== Nuclear proliferation in Asia risks nuclear war- mistrust between countries, coalitions could form, misperceptions of others actions, and hair-trigger statusCimbala, 2013 UnderviewWas swapped depending on the round Role-playing teaches students to be comfortable with the language of power which is critical to genuine and effective political activism – personal experiences must be tied to concrete political strategies to avoid cooptationCoverstone, 05 – masters in communication from Wake Forest and longtime debate coach Newer reactors will be even worse; the nuclear renaissance will cause reactors to be even less safe—multiple warrantsSovacool, Benjamin K., and Christopher Cooper 08. "Nuclear nonsense: Why nuclear power is no answer to climate change and the world's post-Kyoto energy challenges." Wm. and Mary Envtl. L. and Pol'y Rev. 33 (2008): 1. Environmental apocalypticism causes eco-authoritarianism and mass violence against those deemed environmental threats – also causes political apathyBuell 3 (Frederick Buell, cultural critic on the environmental crisis and a Professor of English at Queens College and the author of five books; "From Apocalypse To Way of Life," pg. 185-186) | 9/27/16 |
SEPOCT-Aff Prolif v2Tournament: Arlington | Round: 1 | Opponent: All Saints Epispocal | Judge: idk 1ACFramingI value morality since ought implies a moral obligationThe standard is maximizing expected well-beingExtinction outweighs – its irreversibleBostrum 12 (Nick, Professor of Philosophy at Oxford, directs Oxford's Future of Humanity Institute and winner of the Gannon Award, Interview with Ross Andersen, correspondent at The Atlantic, 3/6, "We're Underestimating the Risk of Human Extinction", http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/03/were-underestimating-the-risk-of-human-extinction/253821/) Util is best for policy making and role playing the government—The impossibility to attain knowledge of every outcome or abuse leaves util as the only option for most rational decision-makingGoodin 95 – Professor of Philosophy at the Research School of the Social Sciences at the Australian National University (Robert E., Cambridge University Press, "Utilitarianism As a Public Philosophy" pg 63) InherencyCorporate propaganda continues to push the "so-called" benefits of nuclear in order to shut out deliberation and progress in greener alternatives – be skeptical of their offenseWasserman 16 The Nuclear Renaissance increases the risk of prolif—ensures that new nuclear energy spreads to non-state actorsBozzo, 16 The current NPT is loosing cred and legitimacy- non-nuclear states feel unequally obligated while nuclear powers maintain their weaponsTannenwald, Faculty Fellow at the Watson Institute for International Studies, 2013 PlanThus the plan: Countries ought to prohibit the production of nuclear powerTo clarify this includes the decommission of nuclear weapons. Advantage 1: New StatesThe NPT can't prevent the spread of weapons—ensures prolif will uniquely happen in new statesWesley, 2006 We'll isolate two scenariosFirst is nuclear war, put those prolif good turns away—prolif in new states uniquely causes conflictKroenig 14 – Matthew, Associate Professor and International Relations Field Chair at Georgetown University, and Nonresident Senior Fellow in the Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security at The Atlantic Council ("The History of Proliferation Optimism: Does It Have A Future?", April 2014, http://www.matthewkroenig.com/The20History20of20Proliferation20Optimism_Feb2014.pdf) Nuclear war makes the world go boomCHALKO 2003 (Dr. Tom J., MSc., Ph.D., Head of Geophysics Research, Scientific E Research P/L, "Can a Neutron Bomb Accelerate Global Volcanic Activity?" http://sci-e-research.com/neutron_bomb.html)AP Second is nuclear terror, prolif in new states also increases the risk of nuclear terrorism- intentional transfers, underdeveloped security, and state collapseKroenig 15, Associate Professor and International Relations Field Chair at Georgetown Risk of nuclear terrorism is real and high now – largest threat of extinctionBunn et al 14 ~Matthew, Professor of Practice at the Harvard Kennedy School, with Martin Malin, Executive Director of the Project on Managing the Atom at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, Nickolas Roth, Research Associate at the Project on Managing the Atom, and William Tobey, Senior Fellow at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, March, "Advancing Nuclear Security: Evaluating Progress and Setting New Goals," The Project on Managing the Atom, pg. 5-9/AKG~ Advantage 2: BioweaponsThe pursuit of nuclear weapons increases the risk states will pursue chemical weapons- similar political and technical processHorowitz and Narang, 2014 Pursuit of nuclear and chemical weapons increases the risk of bioweapons pursuitHorowitz and Narang, 2014 Use of bioweapons will destroy life on the planet – the impact outweighs nuclear war and all other harmsOchs 02 – (MA in Natural Resource Management from Rutgers University and Naturalist at Grand Teton National Park ( Underview v1Role-playing teaches students to be comfortable with the language of power which is critical to genuine and effective political activism – personal experiences must be tied to concrete political strategies to avoid cooptationCoverstone, 05 – masters in communication from Wake Forest and longtime debate coach Environmental apocalypticism causes eco-authoritarianism and mass violence against those deemed environmental threats – also causes political apathyBuell 3 (Frederick Buell, cultural critic on the environmental crisis and a Professor of English at Queens College and the author of five books; "From Apocalypse To Way of Life," pg. 185-186) | 10/28/16 |
SEPOCT-Aff Structural ViolenceTournament: Conrad | Round: 1 | Opponent: Grapevine TS | Judge: Dan Rowe SV AC v1I affirm:FrameworkI value morality since ought implies a moral obligationWe morally exclude people based on arbitrarily perceived differences—structural violence is rooted in this exclusionWinter, Deborah Du Nann, and Dana C. Leighton. "STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE." Peace, Conflict, and Violence: Peace Psychology for the 21st Century. (1999):. Print. ~Don't worry I re-cut it~ Thus the standard is reducing structural violence—Four additional warrants for the standard:1~ Eliminating Structural violence is a prerequisite to all other actions-all actions must challenge and change the way we view structural violence and oppressionTaylor Janelle S. "Explaining Difference: "Culture," "Structural Violence," and Medical Anthropology." Office of Minority Affairs Diversity. University of Washington. Web. 28 Mar. 2016. 2~ Consequentialist moral views assume everyone as equals, but that isn't true in the real world—there are always pre-existing structural barriers that have disproportionate effects on minorities—we have to eliminate these barriers first to ensure an equal starting point for all, out groups don't fit under the util calculus3~ Ideal theories abstract from the real-world and ignore its concrete nature—this legitimizes oppression—instead, debate should be about real world consequencesCurry 14 (Dr. Tommy J. Curry, "The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century", Victory Briefs, 2014) 4~ Challenging institutional racism comes first—it makes violence inevitable which turns their util first argsAlbert Memmi 2k, Professor Emeritus of Sociology @ U of Paris, Naiteire, Racism, Translated by Steve Martinot, p. 163-165 Contention 1 is Environmental RacismThe use of nuclear power disproportionately harms marginalized groupsChen, Michelle. "The Radioactive Racism Behind Nuclear Energy." Colorlines. Race Forward, 23 Mar. 2011. Web. 10 Aug. 2016. http://www.colorlines.com/articles/radioactive-racism-behind-nuclear-energy. The status quo views Black bodies as sacrificial—we energize our lives while not noticing the terrible impacts of nuclear power has on themDixon 12 Environmental racism: Is nuclear plant causing cancer for poor black residents of Shell Bluff, Ga.?http://thegrio.com/2012/01/25/nuclear-plants-and-cancer-epidemics-in-a-poor-black-georgia-town-environmental-racism-in-the-21st-ce/ Its try or die for the aff –any negative effects to the Black body are ignored because they are the out-group as explained in Winter and Leighton, they do not fall under the util calculus—this outweighs any benefit to nuclear powerDixon 12 Environmental racism: Is nuclear plant causing cancer for poor black residents of Shell Bluff, Ga.?http://thegrio.com/2012/01/25/nuclear-plants-and-cancer-epidemics-in-a-poor-black-georgia-town-environmental-racism-in-the-21st-ce/ Minorities bear the brunt of harms from pollutionGwynn, R. Charon, and George D. Thurston. "The burden of air pollution: impacts among racial minorities." Environmental health perspectives109.Suppl 4 (2001): 501. Contention 2 is Indigenous PeoplesNuclear power usage dumps waste on native communities.NIRS 01 Environmental Racism, Tribal Sovereignty, and Nuclear Waste http://www.nirs.org/factsheets/pfsejfactsheet.htm Nuclear waste dumping kills Native American sovereignty and the government takes advantage of the situation they have put them in by offering bribes to dump wasteLopez, Bayley. "Radioactive Reservation: The Uphill Battle to Keep Nuclear Waste Off Native American Land." Nuclear Age Peace Foundation. N.p., 02 Sept. 2004. Web. 29 Aug. 2016. https://www.wagingpeace.org/radioactive-reservation-the-uphill-battle-to-keep-nuclear-waste-off-native-american-land/. | 9/2/16 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|