Tournament: Winston Churchill Classic | Round: 2 | Opponent: FloMou AG | Judge: Radpour, Diann
I negate Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech.
The standard for today’s round will be minimizing suffering.
Suffering is something that is ignored in traditional settings under the guise of whiteness. The debate space is key as a starting point of discussion for meaningful change.
Kateb 11 George. William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics, Emeritus; his field is political theory. “Human Dignity”.. Copyright The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England. 2011. Pages at the end of card.
Is it then...
AND
...other or lesser
Contention 1 is Hate Speech
First is Racism
HATE SPEECH IS A SERIOUS PROBLEM ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES
Melissa Weberman, Law Clerk 11th Circuit, 2010, “University Hate Speech Policies and the Captive Audience Doctrine,” Ohio Northern University Law Review, 36 Ohio N.U.L. Rev. 553, p. 553-4
Colleges and universities...
AND
...exist at all.
RACIST SPEECH CAUSES HARM TO THE TARGET
John T. Bennett, US Army Captain-JAG Corps, 2016, “The Harm in Hate Speech: A Critique of the Empirical and Legal Bases of Hate Speech Regulation,” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Spring, 43 Hastings Const. L.Q. 445, p. 463
Mary Matsuda and...
AND
...various social problems.
RACIALLY INTIMIDATING SPEECH IS VIOLENT
Alexander Tsesis, Attorney, 2010, “Burning Crosses on Campus: University Hate Speech Codes,” Connecticut Law Review, December, 43 Conn. L. Rev. 617, p. 665-6
Allowing students or...
AND
... or instigate violence.
TOLERANCE OF HATE SPEECH PERPETUATES SOCIAL HARMS AND CREATES A WIDESPREAD COMMUNITY OF RACISM AND VIOLENCE
Catherine B. Johnson, J.D. Candidate, 2000, “Stopping Hate Without Stifling Speech: Re-Examining the Merits of Hate Speech Codes on University Campuses,” Fordham Urban Law Journal, August, 27 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1821, p. 1846-7
Those who call...
AND
...the assaultive speech.
Next is Fan Speech
FAN SPEECH AT UNIVERSITY SPORTING EVENTS CAN BE VERY OFFENSIVE, INCLUDES HOMOPHOBIA AND HARRASSMENT
Christopher J. Kaufman, J.D. Candidate, 2009, “Unsportsmanlike Conduct: 15-yard Penalty and Loss of Free Speech in Public University Sports Stadium,” University of Kansas Law Review, June, 57 Kan. L. Rev. 1235, p. 1239
The extent to which...
AND
...whores" at his family
UNIVERSITIES SHOULD CURTAIL DANGEROUS FAN SPEECH BUT NOT OFFENSIVE FAN SPEECH
Kelley Tiffany, Attorney, 2007, “Cheering Speech at State University Athletic Events: How Do You Regulate Bad Spectator Sportsmanship?” Sports Law Journal, 14 Sports Law J. 111, p. 113
Despite the desire...
AND
...flow from spectator behavior.
REGULATION OF FAN SPEECH JUSTIFIED TO PROTECT AUDIENCES
Gregory Matthew Jacobs, J.D. Candidate, 2006, “Curbing Their Enthusiasm: A Proposal to Regulate Offensive Speech at Public University Basketball Games,” Catholic University Law Review, Winter, 55 Cath. U.L. Rev. 547, p. 578
In addition, the...
AND
...listeners at home.
The affirmative position is essentially "wait, analyze, and have patience," but we can't wait while white supremacy sinks its - patience is privilege
Collins-Chobanian 09 Shari, phd in philosophy, prof @ ASU, "Analysis of Paul Butler's Race-Based Jury Nullification and His Call to Black Jurors and the African American Community" Journal of Back Studies 39.4, 2009, Premier, Premier Debate Today, Sign-Up Now
Leipold's Call for Patience...
AND
...the issue of waiting:
