| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard | 5 | Harrison LC | Tejal |
|
| ||
| Lexington | 2 | Siena Cabbage | Amit Kukreja |
|
| ||
| Nowhere | 6 | Us | Them |
|
| ||
| Yale | Triples | Eric Wallach | Wesley Hu, Christian Quiroz, Amit Kukreja |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
JanFebTournament: Lexington | Round: 2 | Opponent: Siena Cabbage | Judge: Amit Kukreja Rodriguez 2 Rodriguez 3 Rodriguez 5 Thus the advocacy: we engage in everyday abolitionist praxis. Rodriguez 7 Lamble Gosset 14 | 1/14/17 |
Listen assholeTournament: Harvard | Round: 5 | Opponent: Harrison LC | Judge: Tejal Yellow rage – listen asshole narrative I engage in killing rage as an enactment of rematriation and radical self-loving. Womn of color have been struck to shut up and cede to Whiteness, resulting to invisibility as a non-living. We are expected to stay compliant as an invisible being, internalizing powerlessness. The 1AC is a disruption of that visibility and the revival from that death. The role of the ballot is to vote for whoever best performatively and methodologically provides a liberation strategy for the oppressed. Discourses on race and racism are coerced by male understandings – womn of color are held to a dual invisibility that stems from the full exclusion from both whiteness and the patriarchy. Womn of color are at the specific intersection between two marginalizations. We are the most intersectional because we recognize the singular differences between our cis-ters. The 1AC act transforms anger into empowerment and change – the radical act is fused with energy to start a fire. Rage is necessary to challenge the internalized bullshit – I am NOT a victim and I will stand for MYSELF. I must rage in fury even if it means we put ourselves on the line. Suppression of rage means that no real change can EVER occur. Look at Malcom X – what the fuck do you thing he would have done if he had suppressed his rage? The academy manifests as a form of white liberalism – their discriminatory views create an illusory façade that their solutions do shit. MY KILLING RAGE IS A FORM OF SELF LOVE. WHITE FEMINISTS THINK THAT THEIR STRUGGLES ARE THE SAME AS OURS BUT THAT IS BULLSHIT. OUR RAGE IS A FORM OF LOVE TO HELP YOU RECOGNIZE THE SHIT THAT HAPPENS. Social inequality makes debate impossible – unconscious and informal mechanisms of exclusion mean that participants aren’t on an even playing field. Even when minoritarian subjects do speak, they are not heard – addressing this social inequality is a prerequisite for further deliberation. All debaters are different and thus interact with the debate space in different ways. Appeals to objective standards such as fairness will never account for the debaters that fall outside of their own subject positions. The detached stance of the policy maker in debate divorces us from true advocacy. Simulations only serve to distance us from real world political participation The goal of education should not be the same as a typical generic education theory argument. Anti-oppressive education requires a confrontation of things we view as commonsense. | 2/19/17 |
Read MeTournament: Nowhere | Round: 6 | Opponent: Us | Judge: Them | 12/4/16 |
SeptOctTournament: Yale | Round: Triples | Opponent: Eric Wallach | Judge: Wesley Hu, Christian Quiroz, Amit Kukreja Endres 1 Endres 2 Smith Grande 04 the advocacy: indigenous peoples ought to engage in a method of repatriation. Coffey and Tsosie 1 Endres 4 Coffey and Tsosie 2 Dr. Shanara Reid-Brinkley | 10/15/16 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|