Tournament: any | Round: 1 | Opponent: radu toma | Judge: dadu moma
Hey, I'm Frances. You can contact me at franceszhuang7@gmail.com or on Facebook (same as my name here, Frances Zhuang). I check Facebook more often, but friend me first—if we aren't already friends, I usually won't see your message until way later.

Tournament: Golden Desert | Round: 1 | Opponent: idk | Judge: idk
A. If the negative reads an interpretation that (insert their disclosure theory interp here), then they must disclose that interpretation on THEIR OWN NEGATIVE page of the 2016-17 NDCA case wiki in (whatever time period they specify)

Tournament: CPS | Round: 1 | Opponent: idk | Judge: idk
Dank memes are on the brink of extinction because college students and administrators get more tilted than the debate community has over this topic (#notmytopic) because they don’t get to stand in their echo chambers repeating the same opinions over and over again in the name of “higher education”.
Melchior 16.
Jillian Kay Melchior fellow for the Independent Women’s Forum and the Steamboat Institute. UCSD Official: Satirical Anti-Safe-Space Publication ‘Crosses the “Free Speech” Line’. Heat Street. June 8, 2016. https://heatst.com/culture-wars/aclu-ucsd-free-speech-safe-space/. FZ.
As we wrap AND do just that! 

It should be no surprise that escaping this academic fascism is harder than winning disclosure bad on the west coast. Debaters love the predictive comfort of regurgitating the same poorly warranted extinction scenarios over and over because it’s *so* “pedagogically valuable” to have the exact same debate every single round.
The Onion 15.
The Onion America’s Finest News Source. College Encourages Lively Exchange of Ideas. News In Brief. April 27, 2015. http://www.theonion.com/article/college-encourages-lively-exchange-of-idea-38496. FZ.
BOSTON—Saying that AND by the viewpoint.

These sorts of echo chambers just serve to conceal the truth #bushdid911 #JetfuelCan'tMeltSteelBeams which means that fighting back academic fascism is a prior question.
Steele 10. (Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Kansas (Brent, Defacing Power: The Aesthetics of Insecurity in Global Politics pg 109-111))
The rules of AND the targeted agent. 

Analytic

Thus the plan:
Resolved: the USFG ought to create free speech boxes in public colleges and universities. I will grant DA links but they don’t matter under the AC framework. 

The Spoof 15 clarifies the advocacy: the government should totally get its shit together and prevent colleges from restricting constitutionally protected satirical speech by creating free speech boxes – #sorrynotsorry, your hate speech PIK doesn’t solve case. Thus the solvency advocate:
Leugen9001, 7-14-2015, "Engineers unveil free speech box technology," Spoof, http://www.thespoof.com/spoof-news/science-technology/124936/engineers-unveil-free-speech-box-technology
A group of AND to our wishes."

Harambe died for our sins so that you and I could be free, but fascism is currently on the rise. Now is the time – you as an educator can fulfill his last dying wish if you endorse satire to prevent fascists like Drumpf and Jake Nebel #EndNebelT from dictating how we live and debate. McRobbie 16:
Angela Mcrobbie, 8-1-2016, "The rise of American fascism — and what humour can do to stop it," openDemocracy, https://www.opendemocracy.net/russell-carmony/rise-of-american-fascism-and-what-contemporary-humour-can-do-to-stop-it
The bright side AND of political power. 

 
Part 2 is the serious stuff

The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who uses satire to propose the best resolutional advocacy to deconstruct oppressive power structures. 

To clarify, satire means using humor, exaggeration, and/or ridiculing oppressors, and a “resolutional advocacy” means the aff should prove that colleges and universities ought not prohibit constitutionally protected speech and the neg should prove that colleges and universities ought to prohibit constitutionally protected speech through those means.

1, Satire is the only way to resist dominant societal discourses since it’s the only way to create an alternative discourse from which we can challenge the dominant ones and therefore a prerequisite to any other forms of institutional change or critique. For example, this aff forms an alternative discourse regarding debate by calling it out as an echo chamber and “free speech zones” as danger zones. Kaewanya 12:
Kaewkanya 12’-Dr. Suban Kaewkanya (ดร. สุบรรณ แกวก้ นยา ั )John Draper* A Discourse Analysis of Satirical Resistance to Foucault’s Concept of Power in The Simpsons Movie, Graduate Research Council, http://gsbooks.gs.kku.ac.th/55/cdgrc13/files/hmo13.pdf-
From Foucault’s perspective, AND power and resistance.

2, satire is the only viable method of insurrection and resistance because it uses the master’s tools to break down the master’s house, just like the AC uses the debate space to break down its harmful tendencies and echo chambers.
Phiddian 97:
 (Robert, 1997, lecturer in English at Flinders University of South Australia, “Are Parody and Deconstruction Secretly the Same Thing?,” https://dspace.flinders.edu.au/jspui/bitstream/2328/1032/1/Are20Parody20and20Deconstruction20Secretly20the20Same20Thing.pdf)//RTF
I'd like to AND play of différance. 

Part 3 is the underview
Analytic

Analytic
Reddit user Bookworm9019a writes in 2016: “This seems neg-sided, AND in their meetings?

More analytics

Tournament: UPS | Round: 2 | Opponent: idk | Judge: idk
The role of the ballot and how you vote is ‘Resisting Structural Violence against minority groups.’ Prefer –
Certain groups are excluded from our moral sphere – so its critical we promote equality so that they can join the sphere and offer advice on other moral theories- that means before we can know if another moral position is good or not we first have to take in these perspectives  Winter and Leighton 99
Deborah DuNann Winter and Dana C. Leighton. "Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st century." Pages 4-5. RB
Finally, to recognize the operation of structural violence forces us to ask questions about
AND
local cultures, will be our most surefooted path to building lasting peace.

Plan
Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech.
Contention 1 is challenging hate speech
Hate groups are growing at their highest rates ever—current restrictive speech codes prove ineffective. Heller 12/6
Heller 12/6 (Dave, staff @ NewsWorks, "Examining the rise in hate groups", http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/local/newsworks-tonight/99466-examining-the-rise-in-hate-groups)**
More than 900 hate groups are operating around the U.S., including many
AND
, in particular, had a very real problem for quite a while."

Colleges can be uniquely key to fighting back echo chambers and toxic ideologies, but status quo censorship is ruining that —- students are becoming more extremist, less understanding, and convinced that they are at war with whatever doesn't fit our perception of normal regardless of whether thats ability race or gender based Lukianoff 15
Lukianoff 15 (Greg Lukianoff – attorney and CEO at the Foundation of Individual Rights in Education (FIRE); published in Wall Street Journal, LA Times, NY Times, Washington Post, and many others; has appeared on CBS Evening News, NBC’s Today Show, and many others,"How Colleges Create the ‘Expectation of Confirmation’", "Polarization and the Thickening Walls of Our Echo Chamber" – "Can College Help Break Down the Expectation of Confirmation?", July 8, 2015, http://www.soamcontest.com/content/how-colleges-create-expectation-confirmation)
In his 2008 book, The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-
AND
to the bold questioning and uncomfortable discussions that intellectual and societal innovation demands. 

Freedom of expression allows extremist viewpoints to be challenged through debate, which demonstrates their flaws and de-motivates others from adopting them — speech restrictions only lead to hostility, divided communities, and push-back, which exacerbates racism and extremism.
Lombardi 15 (Marco Lombardi – member of the Italian Team for Security, Terroristic Issues, and Managing Emergencies, which is a research department in the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan, "Countering Radicalisation and Violent Extremism Among Youth to Prevent Terrorism", https://books.google.com/books?id='kAoBgAAQBAJandpg=PA3andlpg=PA3anddq=preventing+free+discussion+leads+to+extremismandsource=blandots=TJ8fW6700zandsig=Lz4MWuGl6LkEYxy5RdXBDrCAxfUandhl=enandsa=Xandved=0ahUKEwiq56aDsvTQAhUS1GMKHRNUBC4Q6AEIXzAN~~#v=onepageandq=preventing20free20discussion20leads20to20extremismandf=false , pgs. 3- 4)
First, we should carefully calibrate prevention activities and avoid catch-all, indiscriminate
AND
b) not engage in any more hateful behavior
Contention 2 is terrorism

Currently, the biggest terrorist threat to the US is white supremacist lone wolves —- they kill more Americans than jihadists and show more desire to use WMDs
Blair 14 (Charles P. Blair, Senior Fellow on State and Non-State Threats for the Federation of American Scientists who teaches classes on terrorism and WMD technology at John Hopkins University and George Mason University, "Looking clearly at right-wing terrorism," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 9 June 2014, http://thebulletin.org/looking-clearly-right-wing-terrorism7232, *fc)
Five years ago the US Department of Homeland Security’s Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division released
AND
exaggerated, but neither should it be suppressed for political or ideological reasons. 

Dispersion of technology enables lone wolf terrorists to access chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons (CBURNs) – the impact will be mass casualties and unprecedented disruption of financial and social systems
Ackerman and Pinson 14 Gary A. ,Director of the Special Projects Division at the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), University of Maryland, Lauren E., Senior Research/Project Manager at START and PhD student at Yale University, "An Army of One: Assessing CBRN Pursuit and Use by Lone Wolves and Autonomous Cells," Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 26, Issue 1, 2014
The first question to answer is whence the concerns about the nexus between CBRN weapons
AND
Contention 3 is minority movements that will increase equality and thus end hate crimes

Counter-speech works to combat hate speech and helps minority movements succeed—PROVEN TIME AND AGAIN. Davidson ‘16
The Freedom of Speech in Public Forums on College Campuses: A Single-Site Case Study on Pushing the Boundaries of the Freedom of Speech A Senior Project presented to The Faculty of the Journalism Department California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Science in Journalism By Alexander Davidson June 2016
All experts agreed that negative speech creates awareness that surrounds a certain topic. They
AND
true since multiple independent processes can check back the flaws of the others.

Censoring or restricting speech is actively harmful – rules will be turned on minorities and students will be taught to rely on their oppressors for protection, which undermines empowerment. Censorship also turns offensive speakers into martyrs, increasing the effectiveness of their arguments, whereas counterspeech is empirically proven to counter hateful ideologies, the root cause of hate speech—my evidence is directly comparative. Calleros 95.
Calleros 95 (Charles R. Calleros – Professor of Law at Arizona State University, "PATERNALISM, COUNTERSPEECH, AND CAMPUS HATE-SPEECH CODES: A REPLY TO DELGADO AND YUN",  "II. Reply to the Authors’ Rejection of The Arguments of the Moderate Left", EmmieeM)
To challenge them on their strongest ground, I will work within the analytic framework
AND
it sparked counterspeech and community action that strengthened the campus support for diversity.