Palo Alto Independent Zhuang Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Desert | 1 | idk | idk |
|
| ||
| TOC | 1 | tbd | tbd |
|
| ||
| TOC | 2 | forgot | forgot |
|
| ||
| TOC | 2 | forgot | forgot |
|
| ||
| UPS | 2 | idk | idk |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - IMPORTANT NOTES FOR TOCTournament: TOC | Round: 1 | Opponent: tbd | Judge: tbd | 4/29/17 |
0 - READ THISTournament: Golden Desert | Round: 1 | Opponent: idk | Judge: idk | 2/4/17 |
JANFEB - Free Speech ZonesTournament: TOC | Round: 2 | Opponent: forgot | Judge: forgot Thus the plan: The Koala 15 clarifies the advocacy: the government should totally get its shit together and prevent colleges from restricting constitutionally protected satirical speech by creating dangerous spaces – I want to be able to have my #dicksoutforharambe protests without getting cited for indecency. Thus the solvency advocate: Satirical acts like the 1AC are super dank because they help us fight back dictators like jake nebel (#endnebelT) and fascism. We need satire now more than ever before in order to keep our democracy alive – we couldn’t keep Harambe alive but we need to do it for democracy. McRobbie 16: And, all of your ROB arguments are doomed, I don’t care how good you think your Curry card is - radical leftist academia is now at risk of being co-opted by the capitalist machine. Rensin 14: Empirics prove that satire solves for dead participation; their arguments don't matter if they don't encourage participation in the first place. Hayes 16: Talking about subjugated knowledge is the biggest impact under any role of the ballot – think of this card as the spicier version of Winter and Leighton. Part 2 is the serious shit 1, The aff uses satire by refusing preset inflexible classifications, specifically for debate and “free speech zones”, which is a key starting point for resisting oppression, which stems from our underlying assumptions of “seriousness” that allow the rigid hierarchal structures that cause oppression to continue. 2, Satire is the only way to resist dominant societal discourses since it’s the only way to create an alternative discourse from which we can challenge the dominant ones and therefore a prerequisite to any other forms of institutional change or critique. For example, this aff forms an alternative discourse regarding debate by calling it out as an echo chamber and “free speech zones” as danger zones. Using subjugated knowledge of satire is k2 creating an alternative discourse which is k2 solving since it creates a space outside the dominant discourse for us to speak from. Kaewanya 12: 4, satire is the only viable method of insurrection and resistance because it uses the master’s tools to break down the master’s house, just like the AC uses the debate space to break down its harmful tendencies and echo chambers. Part 3 is 420 spikes and preempts
| 4/30/17 |
JANFEB - Whole ResTournament: UPS | Round: 2 | Opponent: idk | Judge: idk Plan Colleges can be uniquely key to fighting back echo chambers and toxic ideologies, but status quo censorship is ruining that —- students are becoming more extremist, less understanding, and convinced that they are at war with whatever doesn't fit our perception of normal regardless of whether thats ability race or gender based Lukianoff 15 Freedom of expression allows extremist viewpoints to be challenged through debate, which demonstrates their flaws and de-motivates others from adopting them — speech restrictions only lead to hostility, divided communities, and push-back, which exacerbates racism and extremism. Currently, the biggest terrorist threat to the US is white supremacist lone wolves —- they kill more Americans than jihadists and show more desire to use WMDs Dispersion of technology enables lone wolf terrorists to access chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons (CBURNs) – the impact will be mass casualties and unprecedented disruption of financial and social systems Counter-speech works to combat hate speech and helps minority movements succeed—PROVEN TIME AND AGAIN. Davidson ‘16 Censoring or restricting speech is actively harmful – rules will be turned on minorities and students will be taught to rely on their oppressors for protection, which undermines empowerment. Censorship also turns offensive speakers into martyrs, increasing the effectiveness of their arguments, whereas counterspeech is empirically proven to counter hateful ideologies, the root cause of hate speech—my evidence is directly comparative. Calleros 95. | 2/4/17 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|