Tournament: Disclosure Theory | Round: 1 | Opponent: You | Judge: David Grohl

Interpretation:

 The negative must disclose past 1NR positions against affs at least 1 hour before the round. These positions must be posted on teh NDCA wiki under their own name with the first and last three words of the piece of evidence along with the author and tag in order to meet my interpretation.

Tournament: Blue Key | Round: 1 | Opponent: Apopka | Judge: Michael Ortega

Contention 1 is Framing

Starts with definitions, value, and value criterion

Contention 2 is Rage

1AC Begins with a narrative by Susan Stryker

This is the violent anti-ethics of monstrosity—bask in the self-imposed exclusion from Being, the bodily disjunction of the trans person which ruptures the normative “human” life.

Stryker 94.

 Susan Stryker, Associate Professor of Gender and Women’s Studies Director of the Institute for LGBT Studies University of Arizona, “My Words to Victor Frankenstein Above the Village of Chamounix,” GLQ, 1994, p. 85-86
I will say this as bluntly as I know how....the seams and sutures in yourself.

The notion of rights is dependent on the fantasy of law providing justice—to recognize antiqueer violence as a result of a larger cultural problem would render the law useless. Antiqueer violence pervades us trans people are killed by police and transphobes, who get out of it through qualified immunity.

Stanley 11.

 Eric, fellow in departments of Communication and Critical Gender Studies, “Near Life, Queer Death: Overkill and Ontological Capture,” 2011, pg. 7-8
The problem of privatizing violence...as the technology, of safety

Transgender people who fail to fall into the normative binary are spoken over and denied subjectivity on a quotidian level. This forces the impossibility of authentic lived experiences.

Stone 94.

 Sandy, Department of Radio, Television and Film, the University of Texas at Austin, “THE "EMPIRE" STRIKES BACK: A POSTTRANSSEXUAL MANIFESTO,” 1994
"Making" history, whether autobiographic...If the transsexual were to speak, what would s/he say?

Stryker Narrative continues

Thus the affirmative advocacy is transgender rage. A redirection of violence done to trans people can provide a way to overcome the cultural stigma around non-normative subjects. This monstrous fury allows for an identity free of gender.

Stryker 94.

 Susan, Associate Professor of Gender and Women's Studies, “My Words to Victor Frankenstein Above the Village of Chamounix: Performing Transgender Rage” GLQ, pp. 248-251
A formal disjunction seems...to transform your world.

There is only one debate to be had—that of the cis-normativity of the affirmative vs. Becoming. Normative perceptions of matter classify it as static. My performance of rage shatters the immutability of Nature and qualified immunity. Identity and reality are refigured, regenerating what never was but might yet have been. This move to life affirming monstrosity taps into the flux of the universe. Monstrosity is reformative—the decomposition of the greater cosmic forces allows for endless possibilities.

Barad 15.

 Karen Barad, Professor of Feminist Studies, Philosophy, and History of Consciousness at the University of California, Santa Cruz, “TRANS*/MATTER/REALITIES AND QUEER POLITICAL IMAGININGS,” GLQ, 2015, p. 410-416
I find no shame . . . in acknowledging