Newark Science AsafuAdjaye Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emory | 1 | Dallastown OM | Jharick Shields |
|
| ||
| Lakeland Invitational | Finals | Lexington NN | Bales, Ashman, Moyer |
|
| ||
| Lexington Winter Invitational | 2 | Stuyvesant KF | Henry Curtis |
|
| ||
| Lexington Winter Invitational | 2 | Stuyvesant KF | Henry Curtis |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
Anti EthicsTournament: Lexington Winter Invitational | Round: 2 | Opponent: Stuyvesant KF | Judge: Henry Curtis B-Impact 2 - And this abstraction allows us to assume racist entities will somehow act justly rather than looking to how they have historically acted. Tommy Curry writes: Curry, Tommy J. doctor in Associate Professor of Philosophy, Affiliated Professor of Africana Studies, Texas A and M University In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical. 2013. SPHSSS C: Alternative- we should be reject the affirmatives ethical stance and become Antiethical. Curry Curry, Tommy J. doctor in Associate Professor of Philosophy, Affiliated Professor of Africana Studies, Texas A and M University In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical. 2013. | 1/15/17 |
Revenge Porn DATournament: Emory | Round: 1 | Opponent: Dallastown OM | Judge: Jharick Shields There are obstacles that a revenge porn victim must overcome. A defendant’s likely defense of consent could nullify such claims. In addition, the First Amendment Free Speech Clause will be said to impose an obstacle if a revenge porn victim seeks civil relief or if the government initiates a criminal prosecution. In fact, some would contend that no tort suit or prosecution could ever be successful. The argument would be that the First Amendment protects an individual against civil or criminal liability for publishing a lawfully obtained image honestly depicting the photographer’s subject, regardless of how unflattering the photograph may be or the effect that publication may have on the subject. Ultimately, the Article maintains, the law must adapt to the “selfie” and “sexting” generation in order to provide meaningful relief to individuals whose wellintentioned—albeit ill-advised—attempts at flirtation achieve perpetual—and unwanted—fame and notoriety on the Internet. Intimate photographs are shared under circumstances giving rise to an implied agreement of confidentiality between the parties, and the Free Speech Clause does not shield a recipient against his broken promise not to share a photograph with others. Imposing tort and criminal liability on someone who breaches an agreement of confidentiality will not chill protected speech. It will only encourage people to keep their word. | 4/8/17 |
Wynter KTournament: Lexington Winter Invitational | Round: 2 | Opponent: Stuyvesant KF | Judge: Henry Curtis | 1/15/17 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|