Tournament: Alta | Round: 3 | Opponent: idk | Judge: idk

LEGALISM K

Short version ~2:10~

Legalism reinforces itself to create a monopoly of force – it perpetuates itself by making legal solutions essential, which is exactly what the aff is doing by limiting QI

Rozo 4 (Diego Cagüeñas, MA in Philosophy and Cultural Analysis, International School for Humanities and Social Sciences, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Jan 2004, "Forgiving the Unforgivable: On Violence, Power, and the Possibility of Justice", http://admin.banrepcultural.org/sites/default/files/forgiving'the'unforgivable.pdf, Accessed 7/7/15)LD
For reasons explained before, Benjamin thinks that "law’s interest in a monopoly of
AND
to present itself as indispensable for any kind of conflict to be solved. 

Legal solutions to political problems cause externalization of agency—-rule of law removes individual responsibility

Rozo 2 (Diego Cagüeñas, MA in Philosophy and Cultural Analysis, International School for Humanities and Social Sciences, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Jan 2004, "Forgiving the Unforgivable: On Violence, Power, and the Possibility of Justice", http://admin.banrepcultural.org/sites/default/files/forgiving'the'unforgivable.pdf, Accessed 7/7/15)LD
The consequence of this infiltration of law throughout the whole of human life is paradoxical
AND
– the law infiltrates into and seeks to rule our most private conflicts. 

Normative legal thought obscures the pain and death of disciplinary systems with language games

Schlag 90 (Pierre, Professor of Law, University of Colorado, "NORMATIVE AND NOWHERE TO GO", Stanford Law Review (November 1990), http://lawweb.colorado.edu/profiles/pubpdfs/schlag/SchlagSLR.pdf)
It is at this point that the legal thinker recognizes that the value (if
AND
empowered Cartesian egos, but who are largely the manipulated constructions of bureaucratic practicess

The alternative is to create spaces beyond the grasp of bureaucratic institutions by practicing indiscipline and the refusal to endlessly apply norms – our utopian ethic is key to breaking out of normative legal thought in the present

Newman 11 (Saul, associate professor in the Department of Government in the School of Public Affairs at American University in Washington, DC, "Postanarchism: a politics of anti-politics" (October 2011), Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 16 no. 3)
At the same time, this aporetic moment of tension central to classical anarchism generates
AND
of new practices of freedom within the context of power relations.
‘

Turns case

Collective indiscipline is crucial to resisting the police state – their reformist focus leaves the police state intact—-means the aff doesn’t solve

Newman 10 (Saul, associate professor in the Department of Government in the School of Public Affairs at American University in Washington, DC, "Politics of Postanarchism" (2010), Edinburgh University Press, pp. 170-173)
Radical politics is nevertheless confronted today by formidable forms of power. As if in
AND
to formulate notions of politics and subjectivity that exceed the grasp of biopolitics.

Legal rights can only be secured by expanding the police state – turns the aff

Smart 89 (Carol, feminist sociologist and academic at the University of Manchester. "Feminism and the Power of Law" (1989), Routledge)
There are less dramatic examples of juridogenesis. Even the growth of rights and rights
AND
fingerprinting. Such measures are part of the juridogenic nature of legal remedies.