Opponent: West Des Moines Valley | Judge: Segriest
ADA
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
Entry
Date
00 - Information
Tournament: Lincoln Southwest | Round: 1 | Opponent: Norfolk BN | Judge: Colten White You can contact me anytime if you have any questions on the stuff I run, or if you just wanna talk about debate stuff and run over some ideas that I could help you with. Contact: jss229438@gmail.com /Add me on Facebook Pronouns: they/her
Please do not spread when you go against me. I find it funny how people always ask the judge if speed was okay, and totally neglect the other team. Spreading is not okay because it totally excludes people with (dis)abilites, even though I don't have any (dis)abilites that does not allow me to process information at incredibly quick paces, I do not understand anything when people spread and freak out during the rounds, which just results in a shit debate. I love debate because I view debators from other teams as my friends. I don't place lots of emphasis on the ballot rather on my bonds that I make with my fellow LD debators so I do try to make my rounds as inclusive as possible and I wish for you to do the same for other debators. Jesse
12/5/16
01 - Governmental legitimacy affirmative
Tournament: Lincoln Southwest | Round: 1 | Opponent: Norfolk BN | Judge: Colten White
Definitions
Value: Government Legitimacy, as achieved when the government protects the rights of citizens. Criterion: Increasing Accountability
Contention One: Qualified Immunity is excused ignorance for public officials.
Armacost 98 { Barbara, Professor of Law at University of Virginia Qualified Immunity: Ignorance Excused, http://www.law.virginia.edu/pdf/faculty/hein/armacost/51vand_l_rev583_1998.pdf, pg 2} In this Article, Professor Armacost uses fair notice in criminal law as a paradigm for analyzing the role of not ...AND... attach. In such cases, qualified immunity's notice inquiry-whether the law was clear-acts as a proxy for fault.
Contention Two: Qualified Immunity has been an ignorant excuse in many instances, and we can see this in the case of Leija and Sheenah.
A) QI was claimed wrongly in the case of Mullenix V Leijha. Liptak 15 { Adam, covers the United States Supreme Court and writes "Sidebar," a column on legal developments. ...AND... /www.nytimes.com/2015/11/10/us/politics/supreme-court-sides-with-police-officer-who-shot-man-in-car-chase.html }
B ) The supreme court ruled in favor of the policemen who shoot Teresea Sheehan, a woman with (dis)abilities.
Liptak 15 { ,Adam, covers the United States Supreme Court and writes "Sidebar," a column on legal developments. A graduate of Yale Law School, he practiced law "Supreme Court Sides With Police in a Shooting, and Against a State on Taxes," New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us/supreme-courts-rules-on-a-police-shooting-state-taxes-and-prisoners-lawsuits.html?_r=1®ister=facebook } The court sided with two San Francisco police officers who in 2008 shot Teresa Sheehan, a mentally ill woman, wh ...AND... San Francisco’s shift in its legal position as the case proceeded had made it impossible to address the question.
Contention 3: Reduction of Qualified Immunity will allow for further elaboration of constitutional rights and clearly establish more laws.
Overall the defense of qualified immunity freezes constitutional elaboration
Matz et al 2011 {Joshua Matz graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School in 2012. He was a law clerk to Judge J. Paul Oetken of the Southern District of New York., “Avoiding Permanent Limbo: Qualified Immunity and the Elaboration of Constitutional Rights from Saucier to Camreta (and Beyond)” Pg 672-673}
AND By reducing qualified immunity, we see an increase of constitutional elaboration.
Beermann 2009 {Jack Michael , Professor of law at boston university,QUALIFIED IMMUNITY AND CONSTITUTIONAL AVOIDANCE, Pg 34} The Supreme Court’s elimination of the subjective element of the qualified immunity defense in constitutional to ...AND... no longer required to reach the constitutional merits whenever the defendant raises a qualified immunity defense.
12/5/16
01 ADA case
Tournament: Millard West | Round: 2 | Opponent: West Des Moines Valley | Judge: Segriest The standard today will be resisting able-normativity. We do this providing eachother with education that opposes mainstream able-normativity. Therefore the debate will be about whoever gives the best methodology for resisting ableist oppression. HARRIS 85 {Merrill, Feminist Teacher, Making Our Students Aware of Ableism pp. 8-10 } We can begin to ...perpetuate this oppression.
Contention 1: Sheehan and Duffie The supreme court ruled in favor of granting the police qualified immunity, who shot Teresa Sheenah, a japanese women with (dis)abilites. The courts left the question whether ADA applied to police arresting people with (dis)abilites, unquestioned and that opens up for mass police brutality upon people with (dis)abilites and letting the police get away with it by simply claiming Qualified Immunity. Liptak 15 { ,Adam, covers the United States Supreme Court and writes "Sidebar," a column on legal developments. A graduate of Yale Law School, he practiced law "Supreme Court Sides With Police in a Shooting, and Against a State on Taxes," New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us/supreme-courts-rules-on-a-police-shooting-state-taxes-and-prisoners-lawsuits.html?_r=1®ister=facebook } The court sided with two ... address the question.
Mr.s Davis is a women with mental (dis)abilites, she was driving with a suspended license due to lack of insurance. And the police analysed her license place (with the handicapped sigma right next to it) and found her status of the license. They wrongly used excessive force to pull her over, literally dragging her body out of her car and causing her to have a panic attack. Even though the 10 circuit courts, affirmed Davis claims they allowed some of the officers qualified immunity still. IF ADA were applied to this, then the police could have accommodated her arrests and would have prevented the bodily harms inflicted on Mrs. Davis. United States court of appeals, 10 circuit 2016 On review of summary judgment... transferred to jail
We affirm and our advocacy is that The Supreme Court of the United States should limit qualified immunity by adopting the Ninth Circuit's decision on Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act's applicability to arrest situations in Sheehan v. City and County of San Francisco as a legal precedent for all circuits on the next available test case. This basically means that police have to provide accomodations when arresting people with (dis)abilities. Like Crisis teams in the case of Sheehan. And if the police fail to do so then when they are sued for damages under ADA then any police claims for QI will be dropped.
Contention 2: Solvency
This is key to solve. Auner 16 {Thomas J. "For the Protection of Society's Most Vulnerable, the ADA Should Apply to Arrests." Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 49.1 (2016): 335.} Excessive force claims stemming ... for the mentally ill.
The plan will not only hold police accountable, but will also change police culture. It enables for the survivors with (dis)abilites to have a voice and draws a public outcry. Armacost 98 {Barbara Armacost, Vanderbilt Law Review, April, 1998, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=90852, "Qualified Immunity: Ignorance Excused," g-lang edited}
If constitutional rights ... of clear constitutional impropriety.
12/5/16
01 Restorative Justice
Tournament: Norfolk | Round: 1 | Opponent: Lincoln Ease JW | Judge: Sorry I forgot to enter this case Value: Anti-oppression, as defined by protecting the rights of human Criterion: Minimizing Structural Violence
Minimizing structural violence is essential to reaching anti-oppression; institutions are key perpetrators of violence upon marginalised groups.
We need a new lens; the resolution talks about retributive justice and qualified immunity as a punishment. The solution to violations shouldn’t be about paying back a mere sum of money or other types of punishments. Justice needs a radical redefinition;a restoration of peace, not a retribution of violence on the offender. This is necessary for any gains because retributive justice focuses around the state, and draws away peace for victims and offenders. Zehr 90 { Howard, Distinguished Professor of Restorative Justice at Eastern Mennonite University, american criminologist, Changing Lenses : A New Focus for Crime, pg 181}
In this search,... repair, reconciliation, and reassurance.
Thus the methodology: We advocate for a radical redefinition of justice and a doing away with contemporary punishment, Justicia. To clarify, we want for systems of punishment to be oriented around the victim and the offender, not the state, and we want to transform the method of justice; from punishment to collaboration and compromise.
Hence: QI should be done away with and replaced by a statutory system where the police would be able to understand the victim on a human-human biases. Johnson 14 { Ryan, is a Full time lawyer, went to University of Victoria, Faculty of Law, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, J.D. – 201214, "Restorative Justice: An Alternative to Court," http://mineslaw.com/node/152 }
Whilst encouraging others ... and punitive misconduct hearing?
Crime is a result of violations on the offender. Therefore restorative justice is the only way to prevent these things to happen in the first place; this enables the victims to get help and prevent further crime. The framework of retributive justice leads to an impacts of further enforcing a deepening cycle of crime and ignoring the needs of the survivors. Zehr 90 { Howard, Distinguished Professor of Restorative Justice at Eastern Mennonite University, american criminologist, Changing Lenses : A New Focus for Crime, pg 181}
Crime represents an... we should start.
We advocate for the doing away of Justitia, and replace it with the image of a “ healing wound”. Zehr 90 { Howard, Distinguished Professor of Restorative Justice at Eastern Mennonite University, american criminologist, Changing Lenses : A New Focus for Crime, pg 189-190}
How should we ... situation of the past.
Lastly, I shall end my advocacy with poem by John Donne.
No man {Person} is an island, Entire of itself, Every man{Person} is a piece of the continent, A part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less. As well as if a promontory were. As well as if a manor of thy friend's Or of thine own were: Any man's {Person’s} death diminishes me, Because I am involved in mankind, And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; It tolls for thee.
12/18/16
01- Intersectionality
Tournament: Elkhorn | Round: 1 | Opponent: Southwest | Judge: Intersectionality aff V: Protecting the most vulnerable to Police Violcence
Here’s a quote by Nelson Mendela “A Nation should not be judged by how it treats its highest citizens, but it's lowest ones”
C: Intersectionality
The Value in this debate is to resist structural violence against the most vulnerable – this requires intersectionality. You must resist structural violence against the most vulnerable before you can consider any alternative: only this concrete analysis of trans, queer, race, (dis)abilites, and the multitude of the intersections is able to present the impossible demands that will resist assimilation or extermination. Spade '10 (Dean Spade, "KEYNOTE ADDRESS," 19 Colum. J. Gender and L. 1086, 2010, 1109-1110) The political and economic conditions we .... that are deeply rooted in and connected to social movements for racial and gender justice, wealth redistribution, and opposition to imperialism.
Advocacy: The Supreme Court of the United States should limit qualified immunity by adopting the Ninth Circuit's decision on Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act's applicability to arrest situations in Sheehan v. City and County of San Francisco as a legal precedent for all circuits on the next available test case.
Contention 1: Excessive Force Qualified Immunity erases accountability and hazes the line between excessive and un-excessive force; hence opening up a space for mass police violence, particularly violence inflicted upon PoC, People with (dis)abilites, queer people, trans people, and people within these intersections. Stefan 2016 { Lindsey De; “’No Man Is Above the Law and No Man Is Below It:’ How Qualified Immunity Reform Could Create Accountability and Curb Widespread Police Misconduct;” (Apparently 2017 LUL); Seton Hall University, Seton Hall Law, Law School Student Scholarship, Accessed 2016, ,http://scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1861andcontext=student_scholarship}
Of course, the most outwardly evident ... conduct violated the Fourth Amendment.”113
Contention 2: An analysis of police violence upon intersectional bodies. The supreme court ruled in favor of granting the police qualified immunity, who shot Teresa Sheenah, a japanese women with (dis)abilites. The courts left the question whether ADA applied to police arresting people with (dis)abilites and that opens up for mass police brutality upon people with (dis)abilites, espcialley intersectional people with (dis)abilites, and letting them get away with it by simply claiming Qualified Immunity. Liptak 15 { ,Adam, covers the United States Supreme Court and writes "Sidebar," a column on legal developments. A graduate of Yale Law School, he practiced law "Supreme Court Sides With Police in a Shooting, and Against a State on Taxes," New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us/supreme-courts-rules-on-a-police-shooting-state-taxes-and-prisoners-lawsuits.html?_r=1®ister=facebook } The court sided with two San Francisco police... to address the question.
Again another case; Lincoln District Courts ruled in favor of the police who used excessive violence against Leroy Duffie, a black man with physical (dis)abilites. It is clear that qualified immunity gives the police the right to inflict gratuitous violence upon intersectional bodies and still get away with it. Johnson 2016 {Riley Johnson reports on breaking news and public safety issues in Lincoln and southeast Nebraska., http://journalstar.com/news/local/911/appeals-court-lower-court-erred-in-dismissing-lawsuit-brought-by/article_d165d99e-3bd1-5d90-9737-53b72c7c9d9f.html} He was wrongly mistreated by the police ... to have saved him from,” he said.
Analysis: We couldn’t find any cases of trans poc’s w/ (dis)abilites and that could be due to the fact that trans voices are already so erasured. Our anaylytic is that if a trans person faces a particular kind of oppression and and they are also another intersection of identity then the oppression will be more quanitive, (as opposed to qualfitive). These two examples are indicative of a broader picutre of qualfiied immunity; wherein intersectional bodies are faced with enormous amounts of excessive force and then the police could just claim QI and get away with it.
Contention 3: Reducing Works Auner 16 Thomas J. "For the Protection of Society's Most Vulnerable, the ADA Should Apply to Arrests." Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 49.1 (2016): 335. Excessive force claims... police training and provide uniform federal protections for the mentally ill.
11/23/16
02 Stock AC
Tournament: Ralston High | Round: 5 | Opponent: Hastings Senior | Judge: KevinFred Robertson V: Morality C: Minimizing structural violence. Keeping institutions from interfering with one another agency’s is key.
Contention 1: Colleges hurt minorities
Speech codes regulations hurts the very people they claim to protect- Michigan and Great Britian proves Strossen 1 {Nadine, June 1990, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008, John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law at New York Law School., “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990, No. 3, Frontiers of Legal Thought II. The New First Amendment (Jun., 1990), pp. 484-573, Duke University School of Law, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1372555~-~-ghs//sk),} First, there is ... her ethnic background.38 3
Turn- Attempts to suppress hate speech only entices the public to spew out more Strossen 2 {Nadine, June 1990, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008, John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law at New York Law School., “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990, No. 3, Frontiers of Legal Thought II. The New First Amendment (Jun., 1990), Pg 559, Duke University School of Law, pg 559 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1372555~-~-ghs//sk), } Advocates of hate ... protect such speech. 390
Contention 2: Alt right valorization
Speech codes glorifies the alt right; it gives them a cross to hang on and draws additional attention to them in turn enabling them to reach out and radicalize others Strossen 3 {Nadine, June 1990, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008, John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law at New York Law School., “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990, No. 3, Frontiers of Legal Thought II. The New First Amendment (Jun., 1990), pp. 484-573, Duke University School of Law, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1372555~-~-ghs//sk)} A second reason ...or even heroes.
Alt righter, Milo proves- he was banned from a social platform, in response he acted as a free speech martyr. Coupled with the media attention, his extremist views were able to be spread. The same applies to college campuses Ingram 16 {Mathew, Here’s Why Twitter Banning ‘Alt-Right’ Accounts Is a Risky Strategy , http://fortune.com/2016/11/16/twitter-ban-alt-right/} Twitter appears to ... and homophobic remarks.
Contention 3: Agency
The doctrine of free speech has historically been used to defend activist of color, such as the civil rights movement and black militants- we must protect it Strossen ’90 (Nadine, June 1990, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008, John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law at New York Law School., “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990, No. 3, Frontiers of Legal Thought II. The New First Amendment (Jun., 1990), pp. 484-573, Duke University School of Law, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1372555~-~-ghs//sk) The civil libertarian ... the women's movement.435
2/6/17
02- Obrien Test
Tournament: Lincoln East | Round: Octas | Opponent: Fremont CC | Judge: Genrich, Notorious, and Slechta Perm: do both; for reasons that I’ll explain, the negative isn’t at odds in any form with the affirmative, meaning that the counterplan is not mutually exclusive with the affirmative. The issues that the negative point out are not even constitutionally protected speech on the site of the campus - in general, as their evidence suggests, it is constitutionally protected, but in university is not. We apply the O’Brien test, as explained by the Supreme Court in United States v. O’Brien, Supreme Court, United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367, 27 May 1968, http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/obrien.html, as a note: the O’Brien case was specific to draft resistance, but the O’Brien test is still in effect We cannot accept ...for violating it.
We see that the Neg meets
¬Analytic¬
1/15/17
02- Stock AC v2
Tournament: Southeast | Round: 5 | Opponent: Millard North Anya | Judge: Michel fleming V: Morality Morality allows a more objective approach as it could lead to either an affirmative or negative ballot depending on the winning moral philosophy. Hence, morality is the proper value and any other value must be rejected which would mean rejecting a case that does not conclude to the value of morality.
In order to achieve a just moral code, we need a maximization of viewpoints thus the criterion is maximizing inclusion of voices
C: Maximizing inclusion of voices.
Perfer for additional reasons Inclusion of voices allow for heightened education- this crucial to fighting the rooted injustices of society Giroux 04 {Henry A. "Critical pedagogy and the postmodern/modern divide: Towards a pedagogy of democratization." Teacher Education Quarterly 31.1 (2004): 31-47.}
As an introduction ... and gendered inequalities.
B) Unfettered inclusion of all voices is necessary for truth seeking- we need to understand what is actually so of the world if we are to seek for the truth C) A prerequisite to an anti-oppression pedagogy would be the inclusion of all viewpoints- only when we know the how the world is oriented, can we work to better it
Contention 1: Liberal bubble First, censorship kills discussion and political engagement, turning universities into left-wing bubbles. This keeps people from thinking critically about what they believe Lukianoff: Greg Lukianoff (attorney and president of Foundation for Individual Rights in Education). Unlearning Liberty: Campus Censorship and the End of American Debate (p. 28). Encounter Books. Kindle Edition. Without free speech ... the problem worse. Lack of critical discussion causes echo chambers, leading to epistemic closure and Kristof: Nicholas Kristof (NYT columnist). "The Dangers of Echo Chambers." New York Times. 12/11/16. JY. Some of you ... to any campus.
Contention 1: Colleges hurt minorities
Speech codes regulations punish us even they claim to protect marginalised groups- Michigan and Great Britain proves Strossen 1 {Nadine, June 1990, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008, John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law at New York Law School., “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990, No. 3, Frontiers of Legal Thought II. The New First Amendment (Jun., 1990), pp. 484-573, Duke University School of Law, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1372555~-~-ghs//sk),} First, there is ... {race} ethnic background.38 3
Turn- Attempts to suppress hate speech only entices the public to spew out more Mattimore 15 {Patrick Mattimore is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists and has written commentaries for a variety of publications, daily newspapers, professional magazines, and weeklies., http://careersinpsychology.org/psychology-media-censorship/, THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MEDIA CENSORSHIP } Writing in China,... a plentiful one
Contention 2: Alt right valorization
Speech codes glorifies the alt right; it gives them a cross to hang on and draws additional attention to them in turn enabling them to reach out and radicalize others Strossen 3 {Nadine, June 1990, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008, John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law at New York Law School., “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990, No. 3, Frontiers of Legal Thought II. The New First Amendment (Jun., 1990), pp. 484-573, Duke University School of Law, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1372555~-~-ghs//sk)} A second reason ...or even heroes.
Alt righter, Milo proves- he was banned from a social platform, in response he acted as a free speech martyr. Coupled with the media attention, his extremist views were able to be spread. The same applies to college campuses Ingram 16 {Mathew, Here’s Why Twitter Banning ‘Alt-Right’ Accounts Is a Risky Strategy , http://fortune.com/2016/11/16/twitter-ban-alt-right/} Twitter appears to ... and homophobic remarks.
Contention 3: Agency
The doctrine of free speech has historically been used to defend activist of color, such as the civil rights movement and black militants- we must protect it Strossen ’90 (Nadine, June 1990, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008, John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law at New York Law School., “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990, No. 3, Frontiers of Legal Thought II. The New First Amendment (Jun., 1990), pp. 484-573, Duke University School of Law, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1372555~-~-ghs//sk) The civil libertarian ... the women's movement.435
2/12/17
02- TH v3
Tournament: Fremont | Round: 1 | Opponent: MillardWest NT | Judge: Genrich I affirm the resolution The standard is creating space to grasp voices that were always silenced, allowing haunting to finally be perceived. Auchter 1 {Jessica, teaches UHON 3550/3590—Topics in Behavioral and Social Science and Topics in Non-Western Cultures: Global Humanitarianism, “Ghostly Politics: Statecraft, Monumentalization, and a Logic of Haunting”, pg 64-65 } Studying ghosts necessitates ...impetus of statecraft.
Historically universities have erased trans voices, masking our oppression and relegating trans individuals to a ghostly status Nicolazzo 1 {Z, "JUST GO IN LOOKING GOOD": THE RESILIENCE, RESISTANCE, AND KINSHIP- BUILDING OF TRANS* COLLEGE STUDENTS , 27-29} Situating Trans* Students ... aspiring toward success.
The law is an objective morality enfoced by a beaucractic system, which would emcompass speech codes. Speech codes privatize and shroud the enormity of trans oppression; turning the oppression into spectres Stanley 11. {Eric, fellow in departments of Communication and Critical Gender Studies, “Near Life, Queer Death: Overkill and Ontological Capture,” 2011, pg. 7-8} Where statistics fail,...technology, of safety. 23
Look through any queer studies textbook, You won’t find anything about the Pink Panthers, Monica Jones, and not even the Compton Kitchen riots In this debate round, the ghost comes back to haunt us. This apparition now manifests and threatens to erase the visibility of trans oppression from the academic spaces, once again.
Part 2: The Haunting
I contend that limiting free speech, aims to erase the history of trans-oppression. Either it directly censors the voice of trans individuals or enacts minimal surface level reforms that hides transphobia- this takes away effective methods of trans liberation and feeds into the hauntological suffering that we face.
The university regulates how trans people navigate academic spaces- possessing us and our narratives Nicolazzo 2 {Z,et al assistant professor in the Department of Counseling, Adult, and Higher Education at Northern Illinois University, Introduction, TSQ, pg 366-369} In an attempt .. navigate such spaces
Allowing the University to ignore these haunts allows necropolitical control over which voices gets heard and which stay silenced. Auchter 2 {Jessica, teaches UHON 3550/3590—Topics in Behavioral and Social Science and Topics in Non-Western Cultures: Global Humanitarianism, “Ghostly Politics: Statecraft, Monumentalization, and a Logic of Haunting”, pg 39-45 } Some may argue ...bodies as ungrievable.
Part 3: Exorcism Rather than continually suppress these ghosts of trans oppression- we perform an exorcism to let them in, to respond to their haunts Freccero 07 {Carla, Professor, of Feminist Studies Queer Spectrality: Haunting the Past, pg 207} If this spectral ... of and to respond.
Affirming the resolution means that you affirm protests- This is how we react to these ghosts - with radical activism- Standing with one another and fighting together regardless if you're trans or cis- and rather than let some bureaucratic system choose what’s heard and what isn’t we take action into our own hands. WALIA 12 {HARSHA , South Asian activist, writer, and popular educator trained in the law, Young,Brown and Proud ,39-40}
Third, and the ... a new society.”
Therefore I end this exorcism, urging a vote towards hearing voices that were always silenced.
1/22/17
02- Trans Hauntology
Tournament: Westside | Round: 2 | Opponent: Southwest- Aaron | Judge: Samuelson I affirm the resolution
The standard is creating space to grasp voices that were always silenced, allowing haunting to finally be perceived. Auchter 1 {Jessica, teaches UHON 3550/3590—Topics in Behavioral and Social Science and Topics in Non-Western Cultures: Global Humanitarianism, “Ghostly Politics: Statecraft, Monumentalization, and a Logic of Haunting”, pg 64-65 } Studying ghosts necessitates ... impetus of statecraft.
Part 1: The Ghosts Trans erasure is the ghost that continually haunts us. Our struggles for rights have been erased- look through any textbook and you won’t find anything about the Compton Kitchen Riots, what about the Pink Panthers, not even the STAR Organization.
AND Even our own queer community has historically silenced our voices, our struggle. In other words it’s the LGB community and the “T is silent”. Ginelle 14 {Leela , THE HISTORICAL OPPRESSION OF TRANSGENDER PEOPLE WITHIN THE LGBTQ MOVEMENT,http://www.pqmonthly.com/historical-oppression-transgender-people-within-lgbtq-movement/20426} It’s commonly known ...“The GGGG community.”
The hauntings hollow to this day- trans harassment, bullying, murder is veiled and hidden from society. Bilbrey 15 {Melanie L., Student at Southern Illinois University Carbondale,Transgender Identity and Media in Historical Perspective, pg 26, binary lang} These are issues ... the United States.
In this debate round, the ghost comes back to haunt us. This apparition now manifests once again and threatens to erase the visibility trans oppression from the academic spaces, themselves.
Part 2: The Haunting
I contend that limiting free speech, aims to erase the history of trans-oppression. Either it directly censors the voice of trans individuals or enacts surface level reforms that “protect” trans people- Although a seemingly harmless idea- it results in erasing the remnants of visible trans oppression, or in other words not facing the ghosts of trans oppression as they are- this takes away effective methods of trans liberation and feeds into the hauntological suffering that we face.
There is a spectre haunting university - the spectre of free speech. All of the old powers of university have entered into an unholy alliance to exorcise this spectre: Dean and Professor, Student and Staff, Transphobe and Transwoman. The specter of the past haunts the present, refusing to listen to it causes gratuitous violence and continued suffering to the trans community. The state’s ability to ignore the haunt allows necropolitical control over the distinction between life and death. Auchter 2 {Jessica, teaches UHON 3550/3590—Topics in Behavioral and Social Science and Topics in Non-Western Cultures: Global Humanitarianism, “Ghostly Politics: Statecraft, Monumentalization, and a Logic of Haunting”, pg 39-45 } Some may argue ... bodies as ungrievable.
Part 3: Exorcism Thus the advocacy: I affirm the resolution as a method of monumentalization for trans entities who have been lost to the effects of western re-writing of history, the 1AC is a call to respect the haunt by affirming a world where we acknowledge and face the historical trans erasure- Only then can we effectively react to these ghosts instead of ignoring them and ignoring their haunts.
Rather than suppress the hauntings of trans oppression- we search for these ghosts. We let them in and treat them as “arrivants”, this is key to solvency because we no longer want to suppress these ghosts but rather “let them be demanded of” and then only can we respond to them effectively. Freccero 07 {Carla, Professor, of Feminist Studies Queer Spectrality: Haunting the Past, pg 207} If this spectral ...and to respond.
Therefore I end this exorcism and urge a vote towards hearing voices that were always silence.
1/8/17
02- Trans Hauntology v2
Tournament: Lincoln East | Round: 4 | Opponent: Lincoln Southwest Aaron | Judge: I forgot I affirm the resolution The standard is creating space to grasp voices that were always silenced, allowing haunting to finally be perceived. Auchter 1 {Jessica, teaches UHON 3550/3590—Topics in Behavioral and Social Science and Topics in Non-Western Cultures: Global Humanitarianism, “Ghostly Politics: Statecraft, Monumentalization, and a Logic of Haunting”, pg 64-65 } Studying ghosts necessitates ... impetus of statecraft.
Part 1: The Ghosts Trans erasure is the ghost that continually haunts us. Our struggles for rights have been erased- look through any textbook and you won’t find anything about the Compton Kitchen Riots, the Pink Panthers, not even the STAR Organization.
AND Even our own queer community has historically silenced our voices, our struggle. In other words it’s the LGB community and the “T is silent”. Ginelle 14 {Leela , THE HISTORICAL OPPRESSION OF TRANSGENDER PEOPLE WITHIN THE LGBTQ MOVEMENT,http://www.pqmonthly.com/historical-oppression-transgender-people-within-lgbtq-movement/20426} It’s commonly known ... “The GGGG community.”
The hauntings hollow to this day- trans harassment, bullying, murder is veiled and hidden from society. Bilbrey 15 {Melanie L., Student at Southern Illinois University Carbondale,Transgender Identity and Media in Historical Perspective, pg 26, binary lang} These are issues ... the United States.
In this debate round, the ghost comes back to haunt us. This apparition now manifests once again and threatens to erase the visibility trans oppression from the academic spaces, themselves.
Part 2: The Haunting
I contend that limiting free speech, aims to erase the history of trans-oppression. Either it directly censors the voice of trans individuals or enacts minimal surface level reforms that hides transphobia- this takes away effective methods of trans liberation and feeds into the hauntological suffering that we face.
The state’s ability to ignore the haunt allows necropolitical control over which voices gets heard and which stay silenced. Auchter 2 {Jessica, teaches UHON 3550/3590—Topics in Behavioral and Social Science and Topics in Non-Western Cultures: Global Humanitarianism, “Ghostly Politics: Statecraft, Monumentalization, and a Logic of Haunting”, pg 39-45 } Some may argue ...bodies as ungrievable.
Part 3: Exorcism Rather than continually suppress these ghosts of trans oppression- we perform an exorcism to let them in ;to respond to their haunts Freccero 07 {Carla, Professor, of Feminist Studies Queer Spectrality: Haunting the Past, pg 207} If this spectral approach ... and to respond.
We stand for one another as a community and effectively fight against the ghosts of transphobia- Radical activism and radical community is how we respond to these ghosts. WALIA 12 {HARSHA , South Asian activist, writer, and popular educator trained in the law, Young,Brown and Proud ,39-40}
Third, and the ... a new society.”
Therefore I end this exorcism and urge a vote towards hearing voices that were always silence.
1/15/17
02- Trans Hauntology v4
Tournament: Lincoln Southeast | Round: 4 | Opponent: Millard North Grant Brown, Mememaster | Judge: Ryan Jungers Dad I affirm the resolution The standard is creating space to grasp voices that were always silenced, allowing haunting to finally be perceived. Auchter 1 {Jessica, teaches UHON 3550/3590—Topics in Behavioral and Social Science and Topics in Non-Western Cultures: Global Humanitarianism, “Ghostly Politics: Statecraft, Monumentalization, and a Logic of Haunting”, pg 64-65 } Studying ghosts necessitates ... impetus of statecraft.
Prefer for 3 reasons: Inclusion of voices allow for heightened education- this crucial to fighting the rooted injustices of society Giroux 04 {Henry A. "Critical pedagogy and the postmodern/modern divide: Towards a pedagogy of democratization." Teacher Education Quarterly 31.1 (2004): 31-47.}
As an introduction ... and gendered inequalities.
B) Unfettered inclusion of all voices is necessary for truth seeking- we need to understand what is actually so of the world if we are to seek for the truth C) A prerequisite to an anti-oppression pedagogy would be the inclusion of all viewpoints- only when we know the how the world is oriented, can we work to better it Part 1: The Ghosts We began with the ghost of India Clarke Walker 15{amy, july 22 http://planettransgender.com/transgender-woman-india-clarke-found-murdered-in-tampa-florida/ } The body of ... in power India.
Historically universities have erased trans voices, masking our oppression and relegating trans individuals to a ghostly status Nicolazzo 1 {Z, "JUST GO IN LOOKING GOOD": THE RESILIENCE, RESISTANCE, AND KINSHIP- BUILDING OF TRANS* COLLEGE STUDENTS, 27-29} Situating Trans* Students ... aspiring toward success.
Speech codes regulations punish us even they claim to protect trans people and other marginalised groups- Michigan and Great Britain proves Strossen 1 {Nadine, June 1990, president of the American Civil Liberties Union from February 1991 to October 2008, John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law at New York Law School., “Regulating Racist Speech on Campus: A Modest Proposal?”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990, No. 3, Frontiers of Legal Thought II. The New First Amendment (Jun., 1990), pp. 484-573, Duke University School of Law, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1372555~-~-ghs//sk),} First, there is ... spaces, once again.
Part 2: The Haunting
I contend that limiting free speech, aims to erase the history of trans-oppression. Either it directly censors the voice of trans individuals or enacts minimal surface level reforms that hides transphobia- this takes away effective methods of trans liberation and feeds into the hauntological suffering that we face. The university regulates how trans people navigate academic spaces- possessing us and our narratives Nicolazzo 2 {Z, assistant professor in the Department of Counseling, Adult, and Higher Education at Northern Illinois University, Introduction, TSQ, pg 366-369} We contend that ...communities of color.
Allowing the University to ignore these haunts allows necropolitical control over which voices gets heard and which stay silenced. Auchter 2 {Jessica, teaches UHON 3550/3590—Topics in Behavioral and Social Science and Topics in Non-Western Cultures: Global Humanitarianism, “Ghostly Politics: Statecraft, Monumentalization, and a Logic of Haunting”, pg 39-45 } Some may argue ... bodies as ungrievable.
Part 3: Exorcism Rather than continually suppress these ghosts of trans oppression- we perform an exorcism to let them in, to respond to their haunts Freccero 07 {Carla, Professor, of Feminist Studies Queer Spectrality: Haunting the Past, pg 207} If this spectral ... and to respond.
Affirming the resolution means that you affirm protests- This is how we react to these ghosts - with radical activism- Standing with one another and fighting together regardless if you're trans or cis- and rather than let some bureaucratic system choose what’s heard and what isn’t we take action into our own hands. WALIA 12 {HARSHA , South Asian activist, writer, and popular educator trained in the law, Young,Brown and Proud ,39-40}
Third, and the ... a new society.”
It doesn’t matter if we ever get any legal success. When we stand up and fight with one another there are affective bonds connecting each individual. In this act, there appears a radical community where trans voices are finally heard
Therefore I end this exorcism, urging a vote towards liberation for all