Law Magnet Gao Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any | Finals | Anyone | Anyone |
|
| ||
| Colleyville | 1 | Dulles JG | Megan Boyd |
|
|
| |
| Colleyville | 1 | Dulles JG | Megan Boyd |
|
|
| |
| Emory | 3 | Pittsburgh Central Catholic WS | Aaron Timmons |
|
| ||
| Grapevine Classic | 1 | Woodlands College Park JZ | Pierce Teeuwen |
|
| ||
| Grapevine Classic | 3 | Anderson BD | Nikhil Nair |
|
| ||
| Greenhill | 1 | College Prep DB | John Sims |
|
|
| |
| Greenhill | 3 | New Trier CM | John Scoggin |
|
|
| |
| Harvard | 6 | Strake Jesuit RC | Martin Sigalow |
|
| ||
| Heart of Texas Invitational | 3 | Immaculate Heart DD | John Sims |
|
|
| |
| Isidore Newman | 1 | Northland Christian JW | Chuck Walts |
|
|
| |
| Isidore Newman | 3 | St Andrews Episcopal BM | Chris Vincent |
|
|
| |
| Isidore Newman | 6 | Bellaire JK | Mesha Knatt |
|
| ||
| NDCA | 4 | Marlborough MC | Shania Hunt |
|
| ||
| NDCA | 4 | Marlborough MC | Shania Hunt |
|
| ||
| NDCA | 1 | Harvard-Westlake JD | Aaron Timmons |
|
| ||
| NDCA | 1 | Harvard-Westlake JD | Aaron Timmons |
|
| ||
| NDCA | 1 | Harvard-Westlake JD | Aaron Timmons |
|
| ||
| NDCA | 4 | Marlborough MC | Shania Hunt |
|
| ||
| Newman Smith | Quarters | Marcus NS | Aaron Timmons, Breann Smith, and Sarah Moosa |
|
|
| |
| Strake Jesuit | 1 | Becca Traber | Texas Academy MX |
|
|
| |
| TFA State | 2 | George Range AS | Chris Mifflin |
|
| ||
| TFA State | 3 | Flower Mound KW | Jerry Crist |
|
| ||
| TFA State | 5 | Westwood JA | Arun Sharma |
|
| ||
| TOC | 1 | Harvard-Westlake AM | Lauren Burdt |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Colleyville | 1 | Opponent: Dulles JG | Judge: Megan Boyd Stock AFF Stock NEG Stock Debate |
| Colleyville | 1 | Opponent: Dulles JG | Judge: Megan Boyd Stock AFF Stock NEG Stock Debate |
| Greenhill | 1 | Opponent: College Prep DB | Judge: John Sims 1AC was natives AFF |
| Greenhill | 3 | Opponent: New Trier CM | Judge: John Scoggin AC was consumerism |
| Heart of Texas Invitational | 3 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart DD | Judge: John Sims 1AC was India AC |
| Isidore Newman | 1 | Opponent: Northland Christian JW | Judge: Chuck Walts 1AC - ADA |
| Isidore Newman | 3 | Opponent: St Andrews Episcopal BM | Judge: Chris Vincent 1AC - Accountability |
| Newman Smith | Quarters | Opponent: Marcus NS | Judge: Aaron Timmons, Breann Smith, and Sarah Moosa 1AC was natives |
| Strake Jesuit | 1 | Opponent: Becca Traber | Judge: Texas Academy MX 1AC - Rule Util |
| TOC | 1 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake AM | Judge: Lauren Burdt 1AC - Chronicle |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - ContactTournament: Any | Round: Finals | Opponent: Anyone | Judge: Anyone | 2/19/17 |
1 - DisclosureTournament: Any | Round: Finals | Opponent: Anyone | Judge: Anyone Violation- Net Benefits-
2. Educational benefits D. Education is a voter and o/w fairness- | 2/19/17 |
1 - Ought BurdenTournament: Isidore Newman | Round: 3 | Opponent: St Andrews Episcopal BM | Judge: Chris Vincent Analytic implication | 12/10/16 |
1 - Solvency AdvocateTournament: Isidore Newman | Round: 3 | Opponent: St Andrews Episcopal BM | Judge: Chris Vincent
| 12/10/16 |
1 - Util NCTournament: TFA State | Round: 2 | Opponent: George Range AS | Judge: Chris Mifflin Policies inevitably entail tradeoffs, which necessitates util because any other theory would condemn one specific group. Their duty is to maximize benefits for all. Woller 97Gary Woller, June 1997 (BYU Prof.), "An Overview by Gary Woller", A Forum on the Role of Environmental Ethics, pg. 10/ Equality among individuals proves util. CummiskeyKantian Consequentialism. David Cummiskey. ~Associate Philosophy Professor at Bates College~. Ethics, Vol. 100, No. 3. 1990. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381810** Morality must justify all necessary steps to take a moral action otherwise it's meaningless. Util solves because it views every action as necessary to reach an end. Snyder 96 summarizes Sinnot-Armstrong"A new argument for consequentialism? A reply to Sinnott-Armstrong" FRANCES HOWARD-SNYDER Analytic | 3/9/17 |
JANFEB - Any TTournament: TOC | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake AM | Judge: Lauren Burdt A. Interpretation: the aff must defend that all constitutionally protected speech ought not be restricted.Your Dictionary NO DATE (Your Dictionary, online reference, "any," http://www.yourdictionary.com/any)** Any is an indefinite pronoun that refers to things generallyLanguage NO DATE (Online English grammar textbook, Unit 42: - Indefinite Pronouns," http://www.1-language.com/englishcoursenew/unit42_grammar.htm///LADI) It's the most contextual to the resolution:Lallas (Jackson Lallas, "A DEFENSE OF T-ANY", LADI, 2/9/2017, Online: http://www.theladi.org/blog/2017/2/9/a-defense-of-t-any - MG) Predictable limits –Contextual education - multiple court rulings agree "any" means "all" – legal education outweighs because it trains us to be effective advocates for speech and other issues in the futureElder 91, David S. Elder, October 1991, "Any and All": To Use Or Not To Use?" "Plain Language' is a regular feature of the Michigan Bar Journal, edited by Joseph Kimble for the State Bar Plain English Committee. Assistant editor is George H. Hathaway. Through this column the Committee hopes to promote the use of plain English in the law. Want to contribute a plain English article? Contact Prof. Kimble at Thomas Cooley Law School, P.O. Box 13038, Lansing, MI 48901, http://www.michbar.org/file/generalinfo/plainenglish/pdfs/91_oct.pdf | 4/29/17 |
JANFEB - Counterfactual KTournament: Harvard | Round: 6 | Opponent: Strake Jesuit RC | Judge: Martin Sigalow 1NC – KPart 1: AlternativeThe alt is a counter-factually framed resolution: In 1954, following the Supreme Court decision in Brown v Board of Education, public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected free speech.The alternative is competitive on several levels:B. Functional Competition.C. It competes through net benefit.Hindsight bias ignores contingencies and alternate histories.Lebow 1 (Richard Lebow. "What's so Different about a Counterfactual?" World Politics. Vol. 52. No. 4. July 2000 http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054129 — KW) 2. Counterfactual engagement improves contingent judgement and decision making.Lebow 2 (Richard Lebow. "What's so Different about a Counterfactual?" World Politics. Vol. 52. No. 4. July 2000 http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054129 — KW) Part 2: Non-Ideal Framework
| 4/9/17 |
JANFEB - Counterfactual K V2Tournament: NDCA | Round: 4 | Opponent: Marlborough MC | Judge: Shania Hunt 1NC – KPart 1: Non-Ideal FrameworkThe very use of ideal theory prevents achieving the ideal societies it tries to dictate.Mills 2 (Charles Mills. "'Ideal Theory' as Ideology" Hypatia. Vol. 20. No. 3. Summer 2005. — KW)
| 4/12/17 |
JANFEB - Defend the Topic TTournament: NDCA | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake JD | Judge: Aaron Timmons 1 – TInterpretation – the affirmative must defend that public colleges and universities ought not restrict constitutionally protected speech.Violation: conceded in cross-ex. "Resolved" means enactment of a law.Words and Phrases 64 Words and Phrases Permanent Edition (Multi-volume set of judicial definitions). "Resolved". 1964. Law Dictionary defines protected speechWest's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. “Freedom of Speech”. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. MX. Law Dictionary defines public colleges and universitiesWest's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. “Colleges and Universities”. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. Negate:1:2:3:4:5:6. Institutional engagement: the state is inevitable—learning to speak the language of power creates the only possibility of social change debate can offer. This is best served by imagining the consequences of policy.Coverstone 05 Alan Coverstone (masters in communication from Wake Forest, longtime debate coach) "Acting on Activism: Realizing the Vision of Debate with Pro-social Impact" Paper presented at the National Communication Association Annual Conference November 17th 2005 JW 11/18/15 | 8/15/17 |
JANFEB - Defend the Topic TTournament: NDCA | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake JD | Judge: Aaron Timmons 1 – TInterpretation – the affirmative must defend that public colleges and universities ought not restrict constitutionally protected speech.Violation: conceded in cross-ex. "Resolved" means enactment of a law.Words and Phrases 64 Words and Phrases Permanent Edition (Multi-volume set of judicial definitions). "Resolved". 1964. Law Dictionary defines protected speechWest's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. “Freedom of Speech”. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. MX. Law Dictionary defines public colleges and universitiesWest's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. “Colleges and Universities”. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. Negate:1:2:3:4:5:6. Institutional engagement: the state is inevitable—learning to speak the language of power creates the only possibility of social change debate can offer. This is best served by imagining the consequences of policy.Coverstone 05 Alan Coverstone (masters in communication from Wake Forest, longtime debate coach) "Acting on Activism: Realizing the Vision of Debate with Pro-social Impact" Paper presented at the National Communication Association Annual Conference November 17th 2005 JW 11/18/15 | 8/15/17 |
JANFEB - Kant NCTournament: Strake Jesuit | Round: 1 | Opponent: Becca Traber | Judge: Texas Academy MX The source of normativity is reason. To be moral is to be in line with reason. To be immoral is to be in violation of reason.Velleman, Professor of Philosophy, Bioethics; Director of Undergraduate Studies, Ph.D., Princeton, 1983, 2006 Reason is universal; a reason for you must be a reason for me.Velleman, Professor of Philosophy, Bioethics; Director of Undergraduate Studies, Ph.D., Princeton, 1983, 2006 You cannot universally will a violation of freedom because doing so presupposes the freedom to bring about that action in the first place. This entails an omnilateral will or a higher authority to deal with rights conflicts.Ripstein, Arthur. "Kant on Law and Politics." University of Toronto Law School. http://www.law.utoronto.ca/documents/Ripstein/Kant_on_law.pdf. Thus the standard is consistency with the omnilateral will.First, the AFF allows for hate speech- that doesn't respect the agency of individuals.McGough, Los Angeles Times' senior editorial writer, based in Washington, D.C. He has been writing editorials for The Times since 2006. Before that, McGough worked for 30 years for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette as a reporter, editorial writer, editorial page editor and Washington correspondent, 2015 This reifies the historical failures of the state to recognize certain marginalized groups as equal in moral standing, which is the duty of the omnilateral will.Varden, Associate Professor of Philosophy and Associate Professor of Gender and Women's Studies at University of Illinois, 2010 AND Rectification of justice is key to the framework.Arthur Ripstein (Professor of Law and Philosophy, University of Toronto) "Force and Freedom" Second, the AFF allows for seditious speech, which delegitimizes the omnilateral will.Varden, Associate Professor of Philosophy and Associate Professor of Gender and Women's Studies at University of Illinois, 2010 | 12/17/16 |
JANFEB - LayTournament: Colleyville | Round: 1 | Opponent: Dulles JG | Judge: Megan Boyd Contention 1 is FundingThe aff takes federal funding away from universities taken away.Perrino, Nico graduated from Indiana University-Bloomington (IU) in 2012 with a B.A. in journalism and history, 4-25 State funding is down. Federal government is key.Mitchell et al, Senior Policy Analyst with the Center's State Fiscal Policy division, a State Policy Fellow for the Washington State Budget and Policy Center, Mitchell holds a B.A. in Economics and Political Science from the University of Connecticut and an MPA from the Maxwell School at Syracuse University, 2016 Funding is key to the success of universities and for future initiatives.Yudof (Mark Yudof, Former pres of UC, "Exploring a new role for federal government in higher education", University of California, 2010 – MG) Outweighs.These impacts turn the AC:Contention 2 – International LawThe AFF allows for hate speech, which is inconsistent with international human rights law.Cohen, human rights activist, 2015 Perceived moral legitimacy is key to international influence in promoting human rights.Mehta and Winship 10 (Jal Mehta, Associate Professor in Education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and Christopher Winship, the Diker-Tishman Professor of Sociology in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences in the Harvard Kennedy School, "Moral Power," Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, 2010, http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/cwinship/files/moral_power—final_1.pdf)AG Turns case and outweighs - The U.S. is a key player in human rights issues. Vote NEG to ensure that the United States can fight structural violence and maximize net benefits everywhere.Freedom House '12 (Freedom House, a U.S.-based non-governmental organization that conducts research and advocacy on democracy, political freedom, and human rights, "Ten Critical Human Rights Challenges for the Next American President", The Connect U.S. Fund, https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/Ten20Critical20Human20Rights20Challenges20For20The20Next20American20President.pdf, 8/13/2012)HW | 2/4/17 |
JANFEB - Title 9 PICTournament: Emory | Round: 3 | Opponent: Pittsburgh Central Catholic WS | Judge: Aaron Timmons Text: Public colleges and universities ought not to restrict constitutionally protected speech except for speech that would violate Title 9 of the Civil Rights Act. They ought to restrict speech that violate that title.Not restricting constitutionally protected free speech forces the government to take away funding from the schools – its Title 9 of the Civil Rights Act.Perrino, Nico graduated from Indiana University-Bloomington (IU) in 2012 with a B.A. in journalism and history, 4-25 Funds key to giving low-income students a chance at an education.AAU, nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization that comprises 62 leading public and private research universities in the United States and Canada. Founded in 1900 to advance the international standing of U.S. research universities, AAU today focuses on issues that are important to research-intensive universities, such as funding for research, research policy issues, and graduate and undergraduate education. AAU member universities are on the leading edge of innovation, scholarship, and solutions that contribute to the nation's economy, security, and well-being. The 60 AAU universities in the United States award nearly one-half of all U.S. doctoral degrees and 55 percent of those in the sciences and engineering, no date Funds are key to college qualityACE, major coordinating body for the nation's colleges and universities. We represent nearly 1,800 college and university presidents and the executives at related associations, and are the only major higher education association to represent all types of U.S. accredited, degree-granting institutions: two-year and four-year, public and private. Our strength lies in our loyal and diverse base of member institutions, 75 percent of which have been with ACE for over 10 years, 2014 Turns case:
| 1/28/17 |
MARAPR - BIGly CPTournament: TFA State | Round: 3 | Opponent: Flower Mound KW | Judge: Jerry Crist Part 1: AdvocacyCounter-Plan TEXT: The United States ought to guarantee a Basic Income, Van Der Veen:Veen, Robert J. Van Der. "Real Freedom versus Reciprocity: Competing Views on the Justice of Unconditional Basic Income." Political Studies 46.1 (1998): 140-63. Web. The counter-plan solves the harms in the AFF.Basic income breaks the cycle of poverty, Vinik 13:Vinik, Danny. "Everyone's Talking About This Simple Solution To Ending Poverty By Just Giving People Free Money." Business Insider. Business Insider, 12 Nov. 2013. Web. 05 Mar. 2017. Basic income solves the root causes of homelessness, Santens 14:Santens, Scott. "Wouldn't Unconditional Basic Income Just Cause Massive Inflation? – Basic Income." Medium. Basic Income, 22 Nov. 2014. Web. 05 Mar. 2017. Part 2: CompetitionThe counter-plan is competitive with the AFF for 2 reasons:
| 3/10/17 |
MARAPR - Counterfactual KTournament: TFA State | Round: 5 | Opponent: Westwood JA | Judge: Arun Sharma 2 – KPart 1: AlternativeThe alt is a counter-factually framed resolution: In 2006, following HUD's decision to remove residents from public housing, the United States ought to guarantee the right to housing.To clarify, this means the aff defends the res in 2006 and the neg denies it, this counter-factual resolution requires our roleplaying from the time period of Katrina.This historical moment is key to understanding our contemporary debates over the right to housing because it was a monumental uncovering of how HUD has failed to protect certain marginalized bodies.McClain (Dani McClain, contributing writer for The Nation. She is a fellow at The Nation Institute and has written for Talking Points Memo, Al Jazeera America, Colorlines, EBONY.com and Guernica, among other media outlets, "Former Residents of New Orleans's Demolished Housing Projects Tell Their Stories", AUGUST 28, 2015, Online: https://www.thenation.com/article/former-residents-of-new-orleans-demolished-housing-projects-tell-their-stories/ - MG) The alternative is competitive on several levels:Functional Competition.Analytic.Analytic.Analytic.Analytic.1. Hindsight bias ignores contingencies and alternate histories. Controls the internal link to the policy making ROB.Lebow 1 (Richard Lebow. "What's so Different about a Counterfactual?" World Politics. Vol. 52. No. 4. July 2000 http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054129 — KW) Part 2: HistoryPerception is intrinsically tied to cognition which makes it crucial to interrogate our epistemology through non-ideal theory.Mills 2 ("White Ignorance" Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. Published by the State University of New York Press. 2007 — KW) Whiteness proliferates itself in epistemologies through the racialization of time.Mills 4 (Charles Mills "White Time, The Chronic Injustice of Ideal Theory," Department of Philosophy Northwestern University, Hutchins Center for African American Research. 2014 — IS Thus, the standard for the round is to engage in historical analysis to unravel white supremacy's colonization of knowledge and value systems.Linking offense into this standard requires disrupting white time through the articulation of alternative histories that expose the contingencies of whiteness. Part 3: Links to the AFFFirst, disguising white contingency. Whiteness is not ahistoric, but instead has emerged through historical contingencies.Yancy '04 (George Yancy. What White Looks Like: African-American Philosophers on the Whiteness Question. Published by Routledge 2004— KW) | 3/10/17 |
MARAPR - Homeless TTournament: TFA State | Round: 5 | Opponent: Westwood JA | Judge: Arun Sharma 1 – TInterpretation: The affirmative may only defend the that the United States extends housing assistance for homeless people A right to housing refers to a policy targeted exclusively towards the homeless, not everybody. The affirmative may only defend house creation/affordability for the homeless. Morris 10Morris, 2010 ACADEMIC JOURNAL ARTICLE - Journal of Australian Political Economy, The Lack of a Right to Housing and Its Implications in Australia, By Morris, Alan, VOLUME/ISSUE: No. 65, PUBLICATION DATE: Winter 2010, Extra – T spikes out of NEG links Legal precisions outweighs limits and ground —- it's a prerequisite to effective policy education. Shannon.Shannon 2 – Bradley Shannon, law at University of Idaho, January 2002 (Washington Law Review, 77 Wash. L. Rev. 65, Lexis
Predictability Limits | 3/10/17 |
NOVDEC - Ban All CPTournament: Isidore Newman | Round: 3 | Opponent: St Andrews Episcopal BM | Judge: Chris Vincent Part 1 — The advocacyPlan: The United States ought to eliminate qualified immunity for police officers and institute a mandatory indemnification scheme.Mandery '94 (Evan J. Mandery, JD Harvard Law School AB Harvard College chairperson of the department of criminal justice and an expert on the death penalty "Qualified Immunity or Absolute Impunity? The Moral Hazards of Extending Qualified Immunity to Lower-Level Public Officials" Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. 1994) The NC is competitive on two levels:First, the negative advocates the complete elimination of qualified immunity for police officers which is mutually exclusive with limiting qualified immunity because limiting requires still maintaining some qualified immunity protection.The term limit means to restrict, meaning some amount of the object being limited must still exist, meaning the affirmative may not defend a ban of qualified immunity for police officers. Oxford English Dictionaries.http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/limit Second, redundancy – a ban ould make the AFF redundant. Policy makers don't do redundant actions a – clogs the already clogged docket b – they want to get home for Christmas, extending the session with two bills won't do that. Functional competition outweighs – it's key to real world education which outweighs because it gives us portables skills.Third, the negative competes through net-benefits. All of the criticisms that I make of qualified immunity are criticisms of the AFF and any perm that attempts to preserve any level of qualified immunity protection for police.Part 2 - SolvencyThe NC solves for the harms in the AFF on two levels:First, the affirmative has identified harms caused by the current qualified immunity doctrine and the resulting obstacles for suing individual police officers for violating constitutional rights. The AFF claims to solve by making it easier for plaintiffs to sue individual police officers. Therefore, the negative achieves 100 solvency and has a risk of solving better than the AFF because eliminate qualified immunity protection as an obstacle to suing police officers.Civil suits in constitutional rights violations are distinctly important in recognizing the importance of individuals who have their rights violated by government officials, even when the financial liability may be addressed by the government. Armacost 89(Barbara E. Armacost 51 Vand. L. Rev. 583 (1998) "Qualified Immunity- Ignorance Excused" J.D. University of Virginia School of Law 1989 M.T.S. Regent College of the University of British Columbia 1984 B.S. University of Virginia 1976 ) Second, the Affirmative must win that there is a unique benefit to preserving any qualified immunity, like protecting police officers enough to make it feasible to do their jobs. Otherwise, we should completely eliminate qualified immunity, which justifies negating. By imposing a mandatory indemnification scheme, the negative solves for whatever problems qualified immunity is intended to fix with respect to protecting police officers acting in good faith.Part 3 - Reasons to prefer the NCEven in the reformed version offered by the Affirmative, the doctrine of qualified immunity is harmful for several reasons:First, Requiring police to come to court checks back rights abuses.Mathern '12 (Andrew Mathern. "Federal Civil Rights Lawsuits and Civil Gideon: A Solution to Disproportionate Police Force?" The Journal of Gender, Race and Justice. 2012 — KW, JT) Second, qualified immunity undermines critical reflection over and improved development of civil rights law.Hassle '99 (Diana Hassel "Living a Lie: The Cost of Qualified Immunity" Missouri Law Review. Vot. 64 Winter 1999. http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol64/iss1/9 — KW) | 12/10/16 |
NOVDEC - Cap KTournament: Isidore Newman | Round: 1 | Opponent: Northland Christian JW | Judge: Chuck Walts The AFF's reliance on tort law commodifies suffering and legitimizes capitalistic inequality.Abel, Michael J. Connell Distinguished Professor of Law Emeritus Distinguished Research Professor B.A. Harvard, 1962 LL.B. Columbia, 1965 Ph.D. School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 1974 LL.D. (honoris causa), University of Westminster UCLA Faculty Since 1974, 1981 The AFF makes it so only those with money can seek justice, retrenching capitalism.Higdon, Investigative Photo Journalist and Former Police Officer, 2010 The K outweighs – a. neoliberalism causes social inequalities and b. the AFF avoids discussion of neoliberalism, so the root cause to go unquestioned. The K is a necessary pre-requisite to solving for any oppression.Farbod, PhD Candidate at Rutgers, Professor at Moravian College, 2016 Turns case – police violence is a direct result of neoliberalism. A failure to recognize that makes violence inevitable. Your piecemeal reform is part of the problem without recognition of its place in a larger movement is the problem.Lane 7-21, former professor who taught African American literature and culture at UC Santa Barbara. She is author of Coming in from the Cold, a blog in which she analyzes political and social issues through the prism of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s philosophy of nonviolence, 2016 Turns case - Capitalism values people by the abilities of their bodies. Only in a classless society can the impaired have equal opportunities as the able-bodied.Slorach, Senior Disability Advisor at St George's and University of London, 2011 My alternative is to entirely withdraw the logic of capital. Multiple reasons why the alt soles:Individual criticism is key to solve.Johnston, interdisciplinary research fellow in psychoanalysis at Emory University, 2007 2. Comfort:3. Politics:4. Try or Die: | 12/10/16 |
NOVDEC - Kant NCTournament: Isidore Newman | Round: 6 | Opponent: Bellaire JK | Judge: Mesha Knatt The source of normativity is reason. To be moral is to be in line with reason. To be immoral is to be in violation of reason.Velleman, Professor of Philosophy, Bioethics; Director of Undergraduate Studies, Ph.D., Princeton, 1983, 2006 Reason is universal; a reason for you must be a reason for me.Velleman, Professor of Philosophy, Bioethics; Director of Undergraduate Studies, Ph.D., Princeton, 1983, 2006 2. Actions are expressions of an agent's reasoning from their end to the means, which unifies their action into a cohesive movement as opposed to fragmented steps. The end of reaching the bakery unifies the individual actions necessary for that end, like crossing the street; otherwise the individual steps would not have any meaning. Thus, contradictory ends would never yield an action because willing A and not A would not allow you to unify the necessary steps to achieve that end. And, this also proves an intent foresight distinction. If consequences were relevant, we would have to will the possibility of contradictory ends since an action can have different and conflicting results, which wouldn't allow you to unify your will.3. Non-contradictions are meta-constraints because a principle cannot be true and false at the same time otherwise it yields incompatible obligations, so the form of the will to abide any moral theory must first will it as universal.Thus, the standard is consistency with universal reason. You cannot universally will a violation of freedom because doing so presupposes the freedom to bring about that action in the first place. This entails an omnilateral will or a higher authority to deal with rights conflicts. The AFF allows people to sue police officers as private persons for grievances committed when acting as a public official. As a public official, the police officer is acting as an extension of the omnilateral will since the omnilateral will needs people to enforce its laws. Creating a distinction between people’s actions as expressive of the omnilateral will and their actions as expressive of their private will is key to the framework. | 12/10/16 |
SEPTOCT - Climate Change DATournament: Grapevine Classic | Round: 1 | Opponent: Woodlands College Park JZ | Judge: Pierce Teeuwen Nuclear empirically reduces emissions.IEA, policy adviser to its member states, 2015 The AFF causes a shift to fossil fuels and more emissions.Abrams, editorial fellow at The Atlantic and staff writer at Salon, 2013 Emissions cause long-term warming.UCS, nonprofit science advocacy organization based in the United States, no date Impoverished and developing countries are uniquely harmed.Vidal, The Guardian's Environment Editor, 2013, | 9/10/16 |
SEPTOCT - Coal DATournament: Newman Smith | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Marcus NS | Judge: Aaron Timmons, Breann Smith, and Sarah Moosa Removing nuclear power doesn't help the environment- it paves the way for coal and more damaging alternatives to become increasingly popular. Lynas 15.Lynas, Mark. "Why a Green Future Needs Nuclear Power." An Ecomodernist Manifesto. RSS, 18 June 2015. Web. 08 Aug. 2016. British author, journalist and environmental activist who focuses on climate change. He is a contributor to New Statesman, The Ecologist, Granta and Geographical magazines, and The Guardian and The Observer newspapers in the UK, holds a degree in history and politics from the University of Edinburgh http://www.ecomodernism.org/readings/2015/6/17/why-a-green-future-needs-nuclear-power JZ Australia empirically verifies coal tradeoff.Ben Heard 12 ~Masters of Corporate Environmental Sustainability Management, Monash University, 2007, environmental activist, Director of ThinkClimate Consulting~, "That day in December: the story of nuclear prohibition in Australia", Decarbonise SA, 12 Sep 2012 Switch to coal plants worsens environmental racism against indigenous populations. Fox 12.Fox News 12. (Fox News Channel (FNC), also known as Fox News, is an American basic cable and satellite news television channel that is owned by the Fox Entertainment Group subsidiary of 21st Century Fox. As of February 2015, approximately 94,700,000 American households (81.4 of cable, satellite and telco customers) receive the Fox News Channel.~1~ The channel broadcasts primarily from studios at 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York City, New York, "Many Native Americans live next to power plants", 7-4-2012, http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/07/04/many-native-americans-live-next-to-power-plants.html) | 9/24/16 |
SEPTOCT - Kant NCTournament: Grapevine Classic | Round: 1 | Opponent: Woodlands College Park JZ | Judge: Pierce Teeuwen In order for an action to be moral, it must first be willed universally:Actions are expressions of an agent's reasoning from their end to the means, which unifies their action into a cohesive movement as opposed to fragmented steps.ROEDL: AnalyticAnalyticThus, the sufficient negative burden is to prove that the prohibition of the production of nuclear power cannot be willed as a universal principle.Contention:No empirical object is intrinsically valuable. Their value lies only in relationship to rational agency. KANT:Immanuel Kant ~founder of analytic philosophy~ "Critique of Pure Reason" 1781 Analytic | 9/10/16 |
SEPTOCT - Kant NC V2Tournament: Greenhill | Round: 3 | Opponent: New Trier CM | Judge: John Scoggin In order for an action to be moral, it must first be willed universally:1. An agent's will acts on a law that it gives to itself. If pleasure were a law to you, then you would straightaway do the pleasurable act, but since you're autonomous, you can reason about taking the action. Thus a condition of action is that the will is self-determined. KORSGAARD:"Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant" by Christine M. Korsgaard And, only universally willing can be self-determined. KORSGAARD 2:"Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant" by Christine M. Korsgaard 2. Actions are expressions of an agent's reasoning from their end to the means, which unifies their action into a cohesive movement as opposed to fragmented steps. ROEDL:Sebastian Roedl. Prof. Of Philosophy, University of Leipzig. "Two Forms of Practical Knowledge and Their Unity" in Ford and Hornsby, Eds. Essays on Anscombe's Intention (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011) 239.
3. Analytic.Thus, the sufficient negative burden is to prove that the prohibition of the production of nuclear power cannot be willed as a universal principle.Contention: No empirical object is intrinsically valuable. Their value lies only in relationship to rational agency. KANT:Immanuel Kant ~founder of analytic philosophy~ "Critique of Pure Reason" 1781 | 9/23/16 |
SEPTOCT - Natives Consult CPTournament: Greenhill | Round: 1 | Opponent: College Prep DB | Judge: John Sims Text: ~The actor of the AFF~ should prohibit the production of nuclear power on indigenous land if the Native Americans agree.Competition: Mutually exclusive AnalyticCompetes through net benefits.Methodologies to resist structural violence must come through dialogue with the oppressed. Any other method re-entrenches the problem since it is a method of manipulation that reduces the oppressed to mere objects. FRIERE:"Pedagogy of the oppressed" by Paulo Friere 1968 Some indigenous people see waste facilities as good. To clarify, my argument is not that all groups should do this, but they need the option- the aff denies that.Gover et al, Kevin, and Jana L. Walker (Native American Attorneys at Gover, Stetson and Williams). "Escaping Environmental Paternalism: One Tribe's Approach to Developing a Commercial Waste Disposal Project in Indian Country." University of Colorado Law Review 63 (1992): 933. The Counterplan solves better than the plan: consultation leads to the best policies for each clan. Thomas 95 EDWARD K. THOMAS, 1995 (PRESIDENTCENTRAL COUNCIL OF THE TLINGIT AND HAIDA INDIAN TRIBES OF ALASKA, May 18, 1995, http://www.archive.org/stream/biataskforcehear00unit/biataskforcehear00unit_djvu.txt) | 9/17/16 |
SEPTOCT - Nebel TTournament: Newman Smith | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Marcus NS | Judge: Aaron Timmons, Breann Smith, and Sarah Moosa Standards:
| 9/24/16 |
SEPTOCT - Nuclear Power TTournament: Newman Smith | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Marcus NS | Judge: Aaron Timmons, Breann Smith, and Sarah Moosa A is the interpretation: AFF debaters can only prohibit the production of power produced by an atomic reaction.West Law 08 defines nuclear power as A prohibition is only on power not mining. Australia proves.WNA 15 (World Nuclear Association, submission to the South Australian Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission); ISSUES PAPER THREE – ELECTRICITY GENERATED FROM NUCLEAR FUELS, http://world-nuclear.org/getmedia/ac94e701-1980-4af4-a5b1-c5215fc5f385/WNA-NuclearFuel-Cycle-Royal-Commission-issues-paper-3-submission-final.pdf.aspx Prefer field context:
Standards:
| 9/24/16 |
SEPTOCT - Regulations Burden OffTournament: Heart of Texas Invitational | Round: 3 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart DD | Judge: John Sims Part 1 – Resolutional BurdenTo prohibit is defined by Merriam Webster's as:to make (something) impossible to do On the other hand, regulations are defined by Collins Dictionary as:regulations or rules that are put in place to ensure a product, event, etc, is safe and not dangerous Two implications:A. Analytic.B. Analytic.To prove that a prohibition rather than a regulation is called for, the AFF must demonstrate the harms are necessarily inseparable from the production of nuclear power, not merely that they are in status quo technology.Analytic.Part 2 – OffenseSo, we advocate that countries ought to not prohibit but rather regulate the production of nuclear power so that the only nuclear power that can exist is those that1. Don't produce radioactive waste that requires long term storage2. Don't use fissile material that could be hijacked for weaponized purposes3. Don't harm biodiversity4. Don't have automated systems that immediately shut down the reactor when it malfunctions or overheats5. Don't have passive coolingThe first plank solves your terror link since there isn't waste for them to steal. AND a regulation solves best because a prohibition doesn't allow for the reusing of waste.John Upton, ~journalist~, "Our Nuclear Waste is a Goldmine," 21 November 2013, http://nautil.us/issue/7/waste/ournuclear-** The second plank solves your terror link because some reactors can't be used to make nuclear weapons.Warmflash 15, M.D. from Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, and has done post-doctoral work at Brandeis University, the University of Pennsylvania, and the Johnson Space Center The third plank solves your biodiversity impact. You have to prove that the production of nuclear power actively threatens biodiversity now. However, your internal link is about construction. So, you only criticize the new construction or reactors, not the production of nuclear power with current reactors.The fourth plank solves your meltdown impacts.Warmflash 15, M.D. from Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, and has done post-doctoral work at Brandeis University, the University of Pennsylvania, and the Johnson Space Center Fifth plank solves your natural disaster linksChandler, science writer about energy, engineering, and materials science for the MIT News Office, 2014 Sub-Point A) The AFF offense is about harms that are not intrinsic to the production of nuclear power.Analytic.Solves the AFF.Analytic.Analytic.Sub-point B) There is a disadvantage to the AFF solving the problem with the overkill approach of solving a harm by using a prohibition when it could be just as well solved by a regulation. Prohibition kills RandD of potentially versions of nuclear energy that are good under the aff standard:1. Analytic.2. Analytic.Analytic implication.AND, this operates under any paradigm.A. AnalyticB. Analytic | 10/15/16 |
SEPTOCT - Regulations NCTournament: Grapevine Classic | Round: 3 | Opponent: Anderson BD | Judge: Nikhil Nair Regulations NCA. Prohibition vs. Regulation: Future tech solves:Russia proves reactors don’t need waste.Templeton, writer living in Vancouver, BC. Graham has a BSc in Molecular Biology and writes for a number of local and online publications, 2014 | 9/10/16 |
testTournament: NDCA | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake JD | Judge: Aaron Timmons National ServiceMilitary=== National service only includes military service.Collins Dictionary (printed and online dictionary of English) "national service." HarperCollins n.d., Online: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/national-service, Accessed 8/14/2017 - MG | 8/15/17 |
testTournament: NDCA | Round: 4 | Opponent: Marlborough MC | Judge: Shania Hunt National Service MilitaryNational service only includes military service.Collins Dictionary (printed and online dictionary of English) "national service." HarperCollins n.d., Online: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/national-service, Accessed 8/14/2017 - MG | 8/15/17 |
testTournament: Heart of Texas Invitational | Round: 1 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart LM | Judge: Chris Castillo National Service MilitaryNational service only includes military service.Collins Dictionary (printed and online dictionary of English) "national service." HarperCollins n.d., Online: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/national-service, Accessed 8/14/2017 - MG | 8/15/17 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|