Klein Oak George Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any | 1 | Any | Any |
|
| ||
| Grapevine | 2 | Strake Jesuit AS | Lawrence Zhou |
|
| ||
| Greenhill | 2 | Cedar Park MT | Dino DeLao |
|
| ||
| Greenhill | 3 | Katy Taylor RC | Jared Woods |
|
| ||
| Harvard | 1 | North Allegheny JF | Jeremy Dang |
|
| ||
| Harvard | 3 | Stuyvesant PY | Jen Melin |
|
| ||
| Strake Jesuit | 1 | Lake Highland MK |
|
| |||
| UH | 4 | SFA SM | Delil Agho-Otoghile |
|
| ||
| UH | Doubles | Katy Taylor CR | Panel |
|
| ||
| UT | 1 | Woodlands College Park JZ | Jin Lee |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Contact InfoTournament: Any | Round: 1 | Opponent: Any | Judge: Any | 12/1/16 |
JANFEB - Agonism 1ACTournament: UH | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Katy Taylor CR | Judge: Panel
| 1/7/17 |
JANFEB - Agonism 1AC v2Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: North Allegheny JF | Judge: Jeremy Dang FrameworkExclusion is inevitable in any moral theory because it requires one to distinguish between good and bad. When we define justice, that definition always excludes that which it doesn’t account for.Hagglund The belief in peace is contradictory and justifies absolute violence—they foreclose the possibility of justice in the first place.Hagglund The only way to resolve inevitable conflict is to embrace that it is inevitable. This requires an agonistic commitment, which recognizes that conflict is inevitable, but frames the other as an opponent instead of an enemy.Mouffe ‘06
Thus, the standard is ensuring legitimate structures of pluralism. Impact calc:The standard is concerned with the availability to pursue discourse, not whether the discourse is "effective" or not, for that presupposes an already "correct" beliefButler ‘06 AdvocacyI advocate that public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. I defend normal means but reserve the right to clarify in CX in asked.Advantage 1: DiscourseCensorship cedes the political and makes bigots feel more solidified about their beliefs—Trump provesNichols ‘16 Censorship destroys the key ability of students to challenge disagreeable viewpoints AND paints certain viewpoints as illegitimate—that kills agonistic democracySnyder ‘15 Empirics flow aff—speech codes lead to more tangible violence—open dialogue is key to solveMalik ‘12 Free speech is key to real-world trainingVivanco ‘16 Lack of counter-narratives produce echo-chambers that sustains existing power structuresSunstein ‘12 Advantage 2: CounterspeechSpeech codes get used against black rights activists—empiricsStrossen ‘90 History proves—free speech is key to protect black rights movementsStrossen ‘90 The aff creates counterspeech movements that create real ideological change—the aff is a prereq to grassroots movementsCalleros ‘95 | 2/18/17 |
JANFEB - Protests 1ACTournament: Strake Jesuit | Round: 1 | Opponent: Lake Highland MK | Judge: But, western metaphysics continually reaffirms the question of “is”, creating distinct, static categories that are then branded upon the world. I am me, you are you, two distinct, separate entities, always. This mode of thought traps bodies within a singular subjectivity, preventing any becoming other. Specifically, the state apparatus holds these categories in place, harshly defining the limits of becoming through a security logic that seeks to reduce everything to its predictable origin. This management creates the conditions in which any infraction upon order warrants infinite violence. Status quo educational systems operate as extensions of the state apparatus zones of detainment par-excellence, harshly defining the conditions of education within rigid and predictable regulations. A recoding would require an upending of the current system. Thus, the Role of the Ballot is to vote for the debater who best embraces becoming. Nowhere has this been clearer than in student protests: I advocate that public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict protest. We affirm protest in the educational space. We take the bricks from the classroom of reason and smash the windows to look beyond. Specifically, this re-territorialization continually draws out trajectories against state domination. That’s key to a world beyond fascism. The unrestrained and explorative nature of rhizomatic protest opens up new epistemic possibilities – challenging the very nature of the frame of life introduces a pedagogy of radical critique, the only way to account for the ever-changing nature of the world. And, university movements have potential – that’s empirically proven by the Occupation at the New School in 09 Successful protest is always met with detainment by the state apparatus stemming from university policy; the same holds true here. | 12/16/16 |
JANFEB - Structural Violence 1ACTournament: UH | Round: 4 | Opponent: SFA SM | Judge: Delil Agho-Otoghile | 1/7/17 |
NOVDEC - Police State 1ACTournament: UT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Woodlands College Park JZ | Judge: Jin Lee Structural Violence The standard is minimizing structural barriers, defined as alleviating the material conditions that commit structural violence on marginalized groups. Prefer— 1) Debate should deal with material impacts—abstraction reflects privilege 2) Structural violence is based in moral exclusion—ethics do not apply if individuals are not included Part 2: Status Quo Qualified immunity creates a police state immune to criticism—it justifies police abuse Courts use the “clearly established” clause to avoid clarifying core constitutional rights—leads to circular rights violations that justify future police misconduct Qualified immunity serves to diffuse critique and stops expansion civil rights claims elsewhere—it makes police misconduct appear to be ISOLATED instead of SYSTEMIC Part 3: Advocacy Text Plan Text: The United States federal government ought to eliminate the “clearly established” clause of qualified immunity and replace it with a “clearly unconstitutional” clause for police officers. Solvency Restricting qualified immunity is key to unveil abuse within the police state—the aff calls out abusive police Limiting qualified immunity is a uniquely key starting point to create policy accountability—alternatives are inaccessible Civil suits rebuild relations between communities and police Civil lawsuits are uniquely key to hold police accountable—compensation for victims creates change The aff refocuses civil movements—instead of focusing on individual acts, we take the police state out head-on Underview Ideal theory can never guide action—you as a judge must reject abstractions Only material realities are epistemically accessible | 12/2/16 |
SEPTOCT - Israel 1ACTournament: Greenhill | Round: 3 | Opponent: Katy Taylor RC | Judge: Jared Woods AdvantagesInherencyIran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons has ceased in light of the nuclear dealSanger ‘16David E. Sanger, 7-13-2016, "Iran Sticks to Terms of Nuclear Deal, but Defies the U.S. in Other Ways," New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/14/world/middleeast/iran-nuclear-deal.html//KOHS-AG And, the root cause of Iran’s desire to proliferate is Israeli aggression and nuclear power—addressing these concerns is keyFisher ‘15Max Fisher, 2-25-2015, "The real reasons Iran is so committed to its nuclear program," Vox, http://www.vox.com/2015/2/25/8101383/iran-nuclear-reasons Advantage 1: MeltdownMeltdown of the Dimona reactor is inevitableLevinsonn ‘16Chaim Levinson Apr 26, 2016 9, 4-26-2016, "Israel's Dimona nuclear reactor plagued by 1,537 defects, scientists say," Haaretz, http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.716312 Meltdown causes extinctionLendman ‘11Stephen, Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization, Advantage 2: Stability (1:15)Arabian instability is building now—border escalation provesCrooke 7-6Alastair Crooke (Fmr. MI-6 agent; Author, ‘Resistance: The Essence of Islamic Revolution’), 7-6-2016, "Is Israel Preparing for War Against Hezbollah?," Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alastair-crooke/israel-war-hezbollah'b'10829902.html Israeli nuclear power escalates tensions—causes prolifAbuzayyad ‘10Ziad Abuzayyad. Volume 16. No 34. 2010. "Palestine-Israel Journal: The Nuclear Option and Peace in the Middle East," No Publication, http://www.pij.org/details.php?id=1264 Arabian prolif leads to nuclear warEdelman ‘11Edelman, 11 (Jan/Feb, Distinguished Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments and Former U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, Foreign Affairs, http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67162/eric-s-edelman-andrew-f-krepinevich-jr-and-evan-braden-montgomer/the-dangers-of-a-nuclear-iran) Advantage 3: HamasHamas striking now—conflict likely to escalate—Hamas is determinedAP 8-21Associated Press. 8-21-2016, "Palestinian rocket strikes Israel, drawing Israeli reprisal," Stars and Stripes,http://www.stripes.com/news/middle-east/palestinian-rocket-strikes-israel-drawing-israeli-reprisal-1.424873//KOHS-AG Empirics prove—Hamas wants to strike the Dimona reactorPollak ‘14Joel B. Pollak,10 Jul 2014, "'Nuclear Terrorism': Hamas Targeting of Dimona Reactor Meets UN Definition," Breitbart, http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2014/07/10/nuclear-terrorism-hamas-targets-israel-s-dimona-reactor/ Attacks on nuclear reactors are devastating—they’re equivalent to dirty bombsPSR ‘16~"Dirty, Dangerous And Expensive: The Truth About Nuclear Power". 2016.Psr.Org. Accessed August 8 2016. http://www.psr.org/chapters/washington/resources/nuclear-power-factsheet.html?referrer=https://www.google.com/~~ Nuclear attack causes extinction—miscalculation likelyBarrett et al ‘13PhD in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University, Fellow in the RAND Stanton Nuclear Security Fellows Program, and Director of Research at Global Catastrophic Risk Institute—AND Seth Baum, PhD in Geography from Pennsylvania State University, Research Scientist at the Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, and Executive Director of Global Catastrophic Risk Institute—AND Kelly Hostetler, BS in Political Science from Columbia and Research Assistant at Global Catastrophic Risk Institute (Anthony, 24 June 2013, "Analyzing and Reducing the Risks of Inadvertent Nuclear War Between the United States and Russia," Science and Global Security: The Technical Basis for Arms Control, Disarmament, and Nonproliferation Initiatives, Volume 21, Issue 2, Taylor and Francis) PlanTextPlan Text: Israel ought to adopt Uzi Even’s proposal and prohibit nuclear power.Silverstein ‘12Richard Silverstein, 8-20-2012, "Leading Israeli Nuclear Scientist Proposing Closing Dimona in Return for Ending Iranian Nuke Program," Tikun Olam תיקון עולם, http://www.richardsilverstein.com/2012/08/20/leading-israeli-nuclear-scientist-proposing-closing-dimona-in-return-for-ending-iranian-nuke-program/ SolvencyPlan solves stability—Removal of the Iranian threat is a palliative for Israel, while removal of Israeli nuclear power prevents Iran from reproliferatingAbuzayyad 2Ziad Abuzayyad. Volume 16. No 34. 2010. "Palestine-Israel Journal: The Nuclear Option and Peace in the Middle East," No Publication, http://www.pij.org/details.php?id=1264 The nuclear deal will eventually expire—the aff is k2 long term peaceAbrams ‘15Elliot Abrams 7/15,senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, "Iran got a far better deal than it had any right to expect," National Review 2015. Plan spills over to Israel abolishing its entire nuclear arsenal while preventing terrorist attacks on facilitiesSleiman ‘10Mounzer Sleiman (2010) Shutting down Dimona: Israel’s nuclear programme, arsenal and environmental threat, Contemporary Arab Affairs, 3:4, 437-479, DOI: 10.1080/17550912.2010.528203 Existing nuclear weapons are outdated and futile—stopping escalation now is keySleiman ‘10Mounzer Sleiman (2010) Shutting down Dimona: Israel’s nuclear programme, arsenal and environmental threat, Contemporary Arab Affairs, 3:4, 437-479, DOI: 10.1080/17550912.2010.528203 We create movements for environmental changeSleiman ‘10Mounzer Sleiman (2010) Shutting down Dimona: Israel’s nuclear programme, arsenal and environmental threat, Contemporary Arab Affairs, 3:4, 437-479, DOI: 10.1080/17550912.2010.528203 FrameworkNon-naturalist theories are epistemically inaccessible—reject abstractions Papineau ‘07 Naturalism means util—phenomenal introspection means we can export our experience of pleasure to othersSinhababu ‘13 The standard is maximizing expected well-being. Prefer—Util is the only pragmatic option for policymakers—they can only look at macropolitical impactsGoodinRobert Goodin, Professor of Government, University of Essex, Australian National Defense University, "THE UTILITARIAN RESPONSE," p. 141-2, 1990. No act-omission distinction for states—they are responsible for their consequencesSunstein and VermeuleCass R. Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule, "Is Capital Punishment Morally Required? The Relevance of Life‐Life Tradeoffs." John M. Olin Law and Economics Working Paper No. 239 The Law School, The University of Chicago, March 2005KOHS-AG Util calc is k2 moral equalityCummiskeyCummiskey, David. "Kantian consequentialism." Ethics (1990): 586-615. Published by Oxford University Press.KOHS-AG Analytic | 9/17/16 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|