Kamiak Battle Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central Valley | Semis | Gig Harbor CM | Sabin, Orlando, Hartman |
|
| ||
| Emory | 1 | Hawken HG | James Brock |
|
|
| |
| UPS | 3 | Interlake Richie Ma | Erik Legried Brentwood |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Emory | 1 | Opponent: Hawken HG | Judge: James Brock 1AC Read Aff 1N 2 off then caseT (Interp is "the off must be topical)Hate Speech CP 1A We meet and new links into the K then random stuff on substance 2N No collapse goes for both offa few new args 2A I don't remember and I can't find my flows |
| UPS | 3 | Opponent: Interlake Richie Ma | Judge: Erik Legried Brentwood 1AC was non-T performance K In CX both debaters and the judge agreed to have the round outside as a way to solve part of the pre-fiat harms the k k'd (lol) 1NC was 3off (I think) 2N collapsed to Cap K |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
1- ND PLAN TEXTTournament: Central Valley | Round: Semis | Opponent: Gig Harbor CM | Judge: Sabin, Orlando, Hartman Message me on FB if there are any theory/T interps that you want me to conform to. If you don't and you read theory/T, not only will I be really sad, but I will also show the judge this wiki and read meta theory on you...the latter two I'm guessing you probably don't want. | 1/24/17 |
2 - JF Ableism KTournament: Emory | Round: 1 | Opponent: Hawken HG | Judge: James Brock Part One is the Framing:First, speech restrictions, not as speech codes but as the denial of certain bodies access to political spaces, dooms us to reinforce oppression to disabled bodies. Normative evaluation of the resolution must follow a change in epistemology, Hedva Johanna Hedva, xx-xx-xxxx, "Sick Woman Theory," Mask Magazine, http://www.maskmagazine.com/not-again/struggle/sick-woman-theory Second, put away your T arguments, the political subject can never be a disabled body meaning the k controls the internal link it’s the only way to avoid analyzing the right to speech before bodies have equal access. Liberal theory naturalizes ability as an inherent feature of speech, Appudarai and Volger Appadurai and Volger 11 (Carol Appadurai is an Associate Professor of History, The New School Candace Vogler is an associate professor in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Chicago, where she teaches ethics, social and political philosophy, and gender and sexuality studies., "The Critical Limits of Embodiment: Disability's Criticism", Public Culture, Volume 13, Number 3, Fall 2011) DR 15 Third, an interruption of the norms in the political, including debate, is needed. Normalized reactions to disability are exclusive; utopian thinking helps solve. Campbell Fourth, the role of the ballot is to endorse the debater who has the best methodology to exposing, understanding, and disrupting oppressive ableist mindsets through micro-political action. The classroom should be a space of liberatory discourse. Dreaming with disability studies produces an active engagement in the classroom. Exploring utopian alternatives to disability opens up the revolutionary pedagogical potential this space has, and allows us to explore alternatives that have real impacts all of us. Erevelles 14, Part Two is the Substance:Our advocacy is that we as debaters takes an imaginative act and not restrict the free speech of disabled bodies. The law and speech codes reinforce an ontological dichotomy between abled and disabled bodies. We have an obligation to question ableist notions of power which form the root cause of oppression. Campbell 8 Fiona Kumari Campbell is a leading disability studies theorist (2008) by Fiona Kumari Campbell http://www.stopableism.org/view_2.asp And, utopian theorization of imaginative acts is key; only imagining utopian worlds free of ableism can upheave the very roots of the political’s exclusion of disabled bodies, Campbell 2 Next, the performative act of the 1AC provides liberatory potential for the debate space endorsing our methodology causes a spillover into our everyday lives. We need challenge hegemonic conceptions of normality which exclude disabled bodies from engagement through micro-p action. Beckett 13 Serious and systemic Part Three is the UnderviewFirst, this space is key- an analysis of disabled bodies is a prior question to any other form of discourse, understanding why bodies are excluded from discursive spaces is necessary to have meaningful dialogue to begin with. This means the aff is a pre-requisite to fair or educational debate because accessibility controls the internal link to all your theory impacts. Put away your T and theory right now. analytic theory spike analytic weighing Comparative Worlds Approach Maintains Flexibility For Both Debaters, Nelson. Adam F. JD, Director of Lincoln-Douglas Debate and Mock Trial at The Harker School, San Jose, CA. Fourth, Debate is Excluding certain bodies and fairness is part of that problem; embrace k debate to move beyond and liberate oppressed bodies, Brown. (Adam Brown, 2016, NSD Update www.nsdupdate.com) Analytic theory spike Analytic Theory Spike | 1/29/17 |
2 - JF UPS 1ACTournament: UPS | Round: 3 | Opponent: Interlake Richie Ma | Judge: Erik Legried Brentwood Ms. Fox’s clear disregard for her students belies a racist logic that dehumanizes Blackness AND even teachers with the best of intentions have to realize that their role is vital to the maintenance of state domination of Black subjects. The Ballot is a performative act – the ballot is exercising binding power. Every ballot matters – repetition is what confers power on the performative act. What we as debaters, spectator, and judges do today matters. 5Butler 93 Butler, noted for her studies on gender and teaches composition and rhetoric at Berkeley, 93 (Dr. Judith, ‘Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex’) pp. 225 LRP Performative acts are forms of authoritative speech: most performatives, for instance, are AND this citation that gives the performative its binding or conferring power. Thus the role of the ballot is to endorse the debater who best disassembles anti-blackness through micro-political action. Currently, the debate space is ignoring the oppression of black debaters and holding us back from addressing anti-blackness as a community, and the community systemically excludes black debaters from “speech” vis-à-vis competition. Smith 13 Elijah Smith, A Conversation in Ruins: Race and Black Participation in Lincoln Douglas Debate, Vbriefly, 9/4/13 http://vbriefly.com/2013/09/06/20139a-conversation-in-ruins-race-and-black-participation-in-lincoln-douglas-debate/ At every tournament you attend this year look around the cafeteria AND shut down competitors who engage in alternative styles and discourses, and refuse to engage in those discussions even outside of a tournament setting. And, the methodology and utilization of the 1AC is key to challenge hegemonic knowledge production – marginalized voices are excluded in the academia in the status quo. Stanley 7 Dr. Christine A. Stanley '90 is the Vice President and Associate Provost for Diversity and Professor of Higher Education Administration in the College of Education and Human Development at Texas AandM University, 2007, “When Counter Narratives Meet Master Narratives in the Journal Editorial-Review Process”, http://edr.sagepub.com/content/36/1/14.full.pdf+html//dickies I am a Black woman professor and have served in a variety AND These alternative lenses of analyses and interpretations of experiences frequently question and criticize master narratives. I advocate that public colleges and universities ought not restrict the right to free speech of Black individuals Challenging hegemonic narratives within existing institutions key – giving up on academia only re-entrenches authority Giroux 13 Henry Giroux, a former professor at Penn State and currently the Global Television Network Chair of English and Cultural Studies at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, SEPTEMBER 27, 2013, “Henry Giroux on the Militarization of Public Pedagogy”, http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/09/27/teaching-and-learning-with-henry-giroux///dickies SK: Here’s a paradox for you: How do you teach social change or resistance to authority within public schools AND so critique is not enough; we need a language of critique and we need a language of possibility to be able to go forward with this. In this connection, I should like to say something that I have found in many other Writers AND death is in a sense a revolutionary. AND against the interests and objectives of others. | 1/24/17 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|