Tournament: All | Round: 1 | Opponent: All | Judge: All
A: If the affirmative debater does not defend implementation, they may not read a spike saying indicting assumptions in the AC triggers presumption. 

A: The affirmative debater must directly defend the resolutional action of prohibiting production of nuclear power, i.e. they may not defend an action that could lead to that prohibition.

A: If the affirmative debater bans the production of nuclear power within the world of a science fiction story, then they must read the entirety of the story in the 1AC. 

A: The affirmative must defend the implementation of a policy by a government.

A: The affirmative debater may not defend condo logic, that the neg burden is to prove the falsity of the resolution, and trivialism, i.e. that proving the falsity of a statement only proves it is true. 

A: Theory violations must stem from in-round abuse, i.e. debaters may not read theory that indicts out of round practices.

Tournament: Newark | Round: 4 | Opponent: Ridge JY | Judge: Linnea Warburton
There’s a rise in racism on campuses that threatens the very existence of universities in the first place.
Rosenberg 91 David Rosenberg, Racist Speech the First Amendment and Public Universities: Taking a Stand on Neutrality , 76 Cornell L. Rev. 549 (1991). DL
The alarming rise ... Latinos as well.

Thus, CP Text: Public colleges and universities will not restrict constitutionally protected speech except in cases of hate speech.
Battaglia 91 advocates university punishment for student use of hate speech Jack M. Battaglia, “Regulation of Hate Speech by Educational Institutions: A Proposed Policy,” Santa Clara L. Rev. Vol 31 pg.345 (1991) MR 12/30/16
A student who ... on university property. 

And universities should not have the free speech rules of a public forum – key difference is that listeners cannot leave.
Lawrence 90 Lawrence, C. R. (1990). If He Hollers Let Him Go: Regulating Racist Speech on Campus. Duke Law Journal, 1990(3), 431. doi:10.2307/1372554 MR 12/30/16
The proposed Stanford ... walk across campus.

The CP definitely competes – hate speech is constitutionally protected and the aff cannot defend “any” restrictions on it – perming means you’re non-T
Volokh 15 Eugene Volokh, “No, There’s No “Hate Speech” Exception to the First Amendment,” The Washington Post, 5/7/15, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/07/no-theres-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/?utm_term=.05cfdd01dea4 MR 12/30/16
I keep hearing ... religiously offensive statements. 

Net Benefits:

1) Public Debate – hate speech causes some groups to withdraw from discussion, dooming it exclusive and thus unproductive – turns the aff.
Horne 16 Solveigh Horne (Minister of children and equality in Norway) “Hate speech—a threat to freedom of speech.” March 8, 2016. Huffington Post. MR 12/30/16
Hate speech in ... a fundamental right. 

2) Safety of Minority Students -- hate speech intentionally deprives minority students of self-worth and safety on campus; makes their academic experience unequal to those of their privileged classmates.  
Garrett 99 Deanna M. “Silenced Voices: Hate Speech Codes on Campus” University of Vermont MR 12/30/16
Restricting Hate Speech ... with such goals. 

3) Genocide – History proves hate speech acts as justification of genocide.
Delgado and Stefancic 14 Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic (University and Research Professors respectively, Seattle University School of Law). “Four Observations of Hate Speech”. Wake Forest Law Review. 2014. MR 12/30/16
Recent scholarship shows ... would join in.

And the aff doesn’t give speech to everyone – just the powerful, since minorities are silenced by hate speech. I just reverse the script.
Garrett 99 Deanna M. “Silenced Voices: Hate Speech Codes on Campus” University of Vermont MR 12/30/16
Although one would ... systematically preempts response.

Tournament: Newark | Round: 1 | Opponent: Scarsdale SB | Judge: Joe Sahlman
The Aff talks about the importance of free speech for student activism on campuses, but that reaffirms the notion that real protest can only happen through speech in the Public Sphere, which inherently renders the people who actually need the help voiceless and irrelevant.
Hedva 1 Johanna, “Sick Woman Theory,” Mask Magazine, The Not Again Issue, Jan 2016. MR
If we take ... as political activists.”

Not only are these bodies doomed apolitical, they are made completely invisible, leading to internalized oppression that says they can only be “worthy” if they are “fixed.”
Hedva 2 Johanna, “Sick Woman Theory,” Mask Magazine, The Not Again Issue MR
Sick Woman Theory ... needs the fixing.

The alternative is to shift from a Public Sphere notion of activism and recognize and empower invisible activism.
Hedva 3 Johanna, “Sick Woman Theory,” Mask Magazine, The Not Again Issue MR
Sick Woman Theory ... and politically invisible.

The role of the ballot is to endorse the debater who best performatively and methodologically addresses the needs of and incorporates the voices of invisible bodies. 

Ableist norms are embodied in our epistemic thought processes – the debate space is key to breaking through them. Beckett 13:
Serious and systemic ... of that difference.

And my narrative-based method is a prerequisite to theirs since the narratives allow the oppressed to tell their experiences, which is key to any discussion of power relations. Reinsborough and Canning:
In Sum All ... fairer, freer world.