Hunter College Frankel Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beltway | Semis | Success Academy SC | Ana Calizo, Raul Larsen, Allan Xu |
|
| ||
| Beltway | 6 | Randolph AP | Tiffany Dacheux |
|
| ||
| Penn | 1 | Stuyvesant KL | Ben Koh |
|
| ||
| Penn | 3 | Harrison LC | Heaven Montague |
|
| ||
| Yale | 2 | Montville RU | Wesley Hu |
|
| ||
| Yale | 4 | Syosset AM | Becca Traber |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
jf -- 1ac -- oppressionTournament: Penn | Round: 1 | Opponent: Stuyvesant KL | Judge: Ben Koh FrameworkThe role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best methodologically resists oppression. Debates should be over what to do about oppression, not what constitutes oppression. And, the material conditions of violence should come first. HarmsSpeech codes operate from a flawed starting point by putting faith in school administrations to determine what speech is good. Because of this, speech codes end up targeting the individuals they’re supposed to help. And, even if restrictions on hateful speech seem good now, they spill over and block more productive forms of dialogue in the future. Meanwhile, present restrictions on speech do nothing to stop bigotry on campus, and only radicalize racists disguised as the “alt-right.” Worse, censorship makes hypervisible and glorifies the very same oppressors it tries to prevent. Thus, the advocacy: Public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. SolvencyDeregulating speech establishes the necessary precedent for social movements and change. And, counterspeech is a better method than speech codes— UnderviewThe aff’s political method is good— Any alternative inverts the error. Government-as-heuristic is not an abstraction, but rather provides a means of understanding the state and breaking it down. | 2/18/17 |
jf -- 1ac -- oppression v2Tournament: Penn | Round: 3 | Opponent: Harrison LC | Judge: Heaven Montague Part 1 is FrameworkThe role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best methodologically resists oppression. Debates should be over what to do about oppression, not what constitutes oppression. And, the assumption that historically oppressive institutions will alter how they act is an unrealistic ideal that hinders concrete solutions to structural violence. Part 2 is HarmsSpeech codes operate from a flawed starting point by putting faith in school administrations to determine what speech is good. Because of this, speech codes end up targeting the individuals they’re supposed to help. And, even if restrictions on hateful speech seem good now, they spill over and block more productive forms of dialogue in the future. Meanwhile, present restrictions on speech do nothing to stop bigotry on campus, and only radicalize racists disguised as the “alt-right.” Worse, censorship makes hypervisible and glorifies the very same oppressors it tries to prevent. Thus, the advocacy: Public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. Part 3 is SolvencyDeregulating speech establishes the necessary precedent for social movements and change. And, counterspeech is a better method than speech codes— Part 4 is FramingThe aff’s political method is good— Any alternative inverts the error. Government-as-heuristic is not an abstraction, but rather provides a means of understanding the state and breaking it down. Simulated legal debates are good. | 2/18/17 |
so -- 1ac -- nuclear anxietyTournament: Beltway | Round: Semis | Opponent: Success Academy SC | Judge: Ana Calizo, Raul Larsen, Allan Xu The impact is disposability—nuclear power destroys our value to life by rendering the universe a standing reserve that culminates in the wholesale destruction of the environment and other humans. Thus, I affirm Resolved: Countries ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power. I reserve the right to clarify. “Resolved” means to become aware of our own being. The 1AC’s reading of the resolution opens up feelings of anxiety towards enframing. Radical questioning and rejecting technological enframing opens new possibilities. Anxiety is crucial to actualize being in the world. The illusion of choosing how we engage with knowledge is a myth of humanism that keeps us entrenched in technological modes of thinking. We have no choice in how the world is revealed, only in how we are. The aff is critical to break through the deadlock of western metaphysics. Thus, the role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who provides the best methodology for preserving being-in-the-world. That means that you should evaluate ontological questions prior to any other concerns. The role of the ballot ruptures traditional modes of education that stress the optimization of efficiency. Attempting to externalize ourselves from our beliefs and outsourcing responsibility creates passivism and self-hatred. Every question is always already ontological—inquiry that doesn’t begin with the question of being-in-the-world is violently appropriated. | 10/24/16 |
so -- 1ac -- ripsteinTournament: Beltway | Round: 6 | Opponent: Randolph AP | Judge: Tiffany Dacheux Questioning a constitutive obligation can be no more than questioning whether or not you belong to that category. Thus, the standard is maintaining a system of equal freedom. Contention One is Structural Violence The nuclear industry intentionally covers up these incidents in order to continue to curb worker’s abilities to set their own ends. Subpoint B: Indigenous Communities But, regulations fail—a ban is the only way to mitigate the harms. Contention Two is Future Generations The negative impacts of nuclear power outweigh negative impacts of any other form of power production—there is NO WAY to effectively store waste. Nuclear phase out fosters investment in renewables—compensates for the costs of foregoing nuclear power. | 10/25/16 |
so -- 1ac -- testimonyTournament: Yale | Round: 2 | Opponent: Montville RU | Judge: Wesley Hu | 9/17/16 |
so -- 1ac -- testimony v2Tournament: Yale | Round: 4 | Opponent: Syosset AM | Judge: Becca Traber | 9/17/16 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|