Harvard Westlake Meron Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cal Invitational UC Berkeley | 1 | Neha Tallapragada | Rodrigo Paramo |
|
|
| |
| Golden Desert | 1 | Brentwood HG | Ghada Shehab |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Cal Invitational UC Berkeley | 1 | Opponent: Neha Tallapragada | Judge: Rodrigo Paramo 1AC - Security state institutional critique Hate speech preempt NC - Hate speech PIC Harassment DA 1AR - Deliberation is necessary for change NR - Deliberation impossible with hate speech |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
JANFEB - Dorms PICTournament: Golden Desert | Round: 1 | Opponent: Brentwood HG | Judge: Ghada Shehab Therefore, on the negative we advocate that speech normally protected by the constitution should be restricted in university and college dormitories, residence halls or any other location where students formally live. In particular they should reserve the right to regulate aggressive speech directed at students in a discriminatory manner. Press 08 Jd candidate at Northwestern Press, Joshua J.D. Candidate, Northwestern University School of Law, 2008; B.A., Emory University, 2004., "Teachers, Leave Those Kids Alone – On Free Speech and Shouting Fiery Epithets in a Crowded Dormitory" (2008). Northwestern University Law Review 102. But despite these… the First¶ Amendment This advocacy is mutually exclusive with the affirmative’s refusal of all restrictions because it creates a space for the university to limit what students would normally have free range to say. Even if it wasn’t, there are several disadvantages to doing the affirmative that make our advocacy preferable by itself. Dorms and residence halls are hot spots for harassment that students can’t escape. Press 08 When considering the… court in U WM.” Students should certainly be exposed to new ideas and ways of seeing the world. But, they also need somewhere safe to retreat. This approach also … their student bodies. And, the our advocacy is will not get overturned and can withstand scrutiny. We tie anti-discrimination laws to speech codes in dorms. Press 08 Yet the arguments… be unconstitutionally chilled."' Hate speech has to be limited in the dorms. This type of speech does real violence that makes college unbearable. Delgado and Stefacic ‘09 II. OBSERVATION NUMBER TWO:… of free expression.111 This destroys the effectiveness of the marketplace of ideas and makes deliberation and conversation impossible. Post ‘91 D. Harm to the… stigmatizing victim groups. My opponent case relies on promoting speech for everyone. But, that is an ineffective starting point to promote quality of life and rights of people on campus. Instead, we need some regulation on the marketplace of ideas. Before addressing the specifics of their case we will isolate a few problems with their thesis. First, unrestricted speech creates a chilling effect where people are terrified to speak out. This has the effect of creating less dialogue. Inbger 84 The clear and… to established norms Second, don’t listen to their arguments about a ban getting misapplied. Tons of European countries already ban hate speech. There’s no spillover effect. Muravchik 10 Moreover, a wealth… very little thinking. | 2/18/17 |
JANFEB - Hate Speech PIC Harassment DATournament: Cal Invitational UC Berkeley | Round: 1 | Opponent: Neha Tallapragada | Judge: Rodrigo Paramo Byrne, J. Peter. Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center. "Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University." Geo. LJ 79 (1990): 399. This article examines… and informed judgment. 3 The counterplan establishes checks on reverse enforcement, chilling effect, and slippery slope. Byrne, J. Peter. Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center. "Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University." Geo. LJ 79 (1990): 399. Disciplinary rules are… and hurtful¶ ranting. Hate speech degrades minorities, locking in the squo and ensuring their failure. Delgado 2k And hate speech primes society for genocide – multiple empirical examples prove. Tsesis 09 Title IX investigations are increasing. Kingiade 16. AFF guts effectiveness of Title IX – it causes first amendment opportunism. Schauer 04 Title IX is currently effective against harassment – this dramatically increases access to higher education. Musil 07 Caryn Musil, Scaling the Ivory Towers, MS Magazine Fall 2007: The Triumphs of Title IX, http://www.feminist.org/education/TriumphsOfTitleIX.pdf. NS The contrast between… dominated by men. Gender equality in higher education and the workforce is key to climate science and innovation. Gender Summit 13 Gender Summit 3 — North America, Diversity Fueling Excellence in Research and Innovation: Ms. Jarrett noted… equality, he stated. | 2/18/17 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
2/18/17 | ameron1@hwemailcom |
|