Harker Jain Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damus | 2 | Rowland Hall-St Marks KO | Dan Miyamoto |
|
| ||
| Harvard Westlake | 1 | x | x |
|
| ||
| NSDA MS nats | 4 | Ron Clark LV | Jane Yuan |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
1 ACTournament: Harvard Westlake | Round: 1 | Opponent: x | Judge: x Framework Contention 1: Innovation Contention 3: Racism Discrimination against African Americans exists in all forms of society Bouie 13 Restriction harms progressive movements against racism and hampers groups like BLM. McAuliffe 16 But is censorship …the next generation. | 1/14/17 |
Rnd 4 aff citesTournament: NSDA MS nats | Round: 4 | Opponent: Ron Clark LV | Judge: Jane Yuan I affirm:Resolved: A just government ought to prioritize civil liberties over national security.To clarify, 1) civil liberties only includes rights delineated in the first, fourth, fifth, and sixth amendment, which protect against government intrusion.Randazzo 10 (Kirk A. Randazzo – PhD from USC; Associate Professor of Political Science at USC, "Defenders of Liberty or Champions of Security?: Federal Courts, the Hierarchy of Justice and U.S. Foreign Policy"", Pgs. 28 – 29, https://books.google.com/books?id=G_Kzs-03rgMCandpg=PA29andlpg=PA29anddq=22define+civil+liberties22+amendment+first+fourthandsource=blandots=DgRGE7QC8fandsig=gCY0wB4Hho8WCQituXsEGxukEGwandhl=enandsa=Xandved=0ahUKEwieg5X53r3UAhUMzWMKHab4BuQQ6AEIPTAG~~#v=onepageandq=22define20civil20liberties2220amendment20first20fourthandf=false , EmmieeM) 2) The neg must defend that a just government ought to prioritize national security over civil liberties. Giving them other ground, such as a just government "ought not" do X, or "just governments don't exist," gives them an infinite to one advantage, such I am tied to defending the resolution, which compares two things.3) I defend the resolution on balance. Because the res uses the word "prioritize," I agree that national security is important, but, in general, it should not come before civil liberties.FrameworkSince just governments are the enactor of the resolution and just governments look to util, that links my criterion back to the resolution. Kennan '00– Kennan, George (Professor Emeritus at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton). "Morality and Foreign Policy". Foreign Affairs, Vol. 64, No. 2. 1985. P. 205-218 . NN. Since "ought" implies a moral obligation my value is morality. My value criterion is utilitarianism defined by Merriam Webster as a theory that the aim of action should be the largest possible of balance of pleasure over painContention 1: NSA Mass SurveillanceNational security is the justification that underlies NSA mass surveillance, which undercuts civil libertiesKELLY 14 (Jonathan J Kelly 2014 M.A. in Government, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC; 2009 B.A. in Political Science, The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, Galloway, NJ BALANCING NATIONAL SECURITY AND FREEDOM: REACTIONS TO TERRORISM AND ITS EFFECT ON CITIZENS' CIVIL LIBERTIES, CIVIL RIGHTS, AND PRIVACY A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree December 2014~ ~thiele~ ~https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/bitstream/handle/1774.2/37298/KELLY-THESIS-2014.pdf~~ Metadata decimates effective counter-terror – causes information overloadSchneier 15 — Bruce Schneier, Chief Technology Officer for Counterpane Internet Security, Fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School, Program Fellow at the New America Foundation's Open Technology Institute, Board Member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Advisory Board Member of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, 2015 ("Why Mass Surveillance Can't, Won't, And Never Has Stopped A Terrorist," Digg — excerpt from Data and Goliath, March 24th, Available Online at https://digg.com/2015/why-mass-surveillance-cant-wont-and-never-has-stopped-a-terrorist, Accessed 07-12-2015) SummaryIf we prioritize national security, the NSA will get so much data that they will be overloaded, so they cannot solve terrorism. For example, the NSA passes thousands of tips per month, and all of them turned out to be false alarms. Contention 2: DronesDrone used for the purpose of national security come with a trade-off of civil libertiesWhitfield 14 (Teresa Whitfield – fellow of the New York Center of International Cooperation/senior advisor to the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue/ex-director of Conflict Prevention and Peace Forum at Social Science Research Council, "Endgame for the ETA: Elusive Peace in the Basque Country", pg. 13, Date Accessed: 6/15/17, https://books.google.com/books?id=C0BeBAAAQBAJandpg=PA13andlpg=PA13anddq=22drones22+trade+off+between+national+security+and+civil+libertyandsource=blandots=yra_u2rPDTandsig=0jjhDhkpF7E_jd7RVJ-QKZPITMUandhl=enandsa=Xandved=0ahUKEwjU5fXLlsDUAhUX22MKHSpmBpQQ6AEIQjAF~~#v=onepageandq=22drones2220trade20off20between20national20security20and20civil20libertyandf=false, EmmieeM) Drones kill primarily innocent civilians and very low-ranking terrorists, while incentivizing citizens to join terrorist organizations to seek revenge, creating massive socio-political unrest that further exacerbates the problemBoyle 13 (Michael J. Boyle – Associate Professor of Political Science at La Salle University and a Senior Fellow with the Foreign Policy Research Institute/ex-Lecturer in International Relations and Research Fellow at the Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence at the University St. Andrews/PhD in International Relations from Cambridge, "The Cost and Consequences of Drone Warfare", https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2862/385bcee7ce4419e8816160d6a1d07eed9ec7.pdf , "The Myth of Drone Effectiveness", pgs. 3 – 22, Date Accessed: 6/15/17, EmmieeM) SummaryDrones are used at the trade off between national security and civil liberties—-they are used when national security is prioritized. These drones are awful, they kill an immense amount of innocent civillians while providing minimal benefit. In addition, they make terrorism worse because people seeking revenge join terrorist groups. Contention 3: Surveillance of Muslim CommunitiesThe government is profiling and surveilling Muslim communities out of national security concerns, which violates their civil liberties and creates a culture of fear and distrust of law enforcementBartosiewicz 13 (Petra Bartosiewicz – Went to Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism/Writing for The Nation/Has written for New York Times, Harper's Bazaar, New Republic, Mother Jones, etc, "NYPD Surveillance of Muslims Has Created a Climate of Fear", https://www.thenation.com/article/nypd-surveillance-muslims-has-created-climate-fear/, Date Accessed: 6/15/17, EmmieeM) A strong, positive relationship between law enforcement and Muslim communities is key to challenging terrorism – Muslim communities serve as the best informantsHarris 10 Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law (David, New York University Review of Law and Social Change, "LAW ENFORCEMENT AND INTELLIGENCE GATHERING IN MUSLIM AND IMMIGRANT COMMUNITIES AFTER 9/11," 34 N.Y.U. Rev. L. and Soc. Change 123, Lexis)AN SummaryWhen we prioritize national security that leads to the government violating the civil liberties of Muslims, and without that trust, it is hard to solve terrorism. When we prioritize civil liberties, we are able to work with their community to help stop terrorism and it gives the empirical example of Lackawanna. Contention 4: Government LegitimacyCitizens do not feel like they need to give up civil liberties for national security. Survey showsGao 15(Education Vassar College Poughkeepsie, NY Majored in environmental studies, with a focus on international politics Minored in English School for International Training Arusha, Tanzania Political ecology program, junior year abroad Experience Pew Research Center Washington, D.C. October 2013 – Present Digital Producer Helped launch Fact Tank, a new data blog featuring the latest in social science research, demographics, economic trends and public attitudes. Fact Tank now receives more than 5 million unique visitors every month. Wrote more than 40 articles on political attitudes, demographics and global issues, including on Chinese public opinion of air and water pollution, demographic shifts in the U.S. toward a majority-minority society, and immigrants in the history of the U.S. Congress. Conducted original research and data analysis using on Pew Research Center's survey data, as well as Census Bureau microdata (IPUMS), United Nations population data, and World Bank economic data. Fact checked and number checked more than 200 articles based on Pew Research Center's rigorus number-checking standards. Managed all homepage content on pewresearch.org Managed @FactTank Twitter account (65,000 followers) and Pew Research Center's weekly newsletter (125,000 subscribers). Inter Press Service (IPS) News Agency New York, NY January 2013 – October 2013 Nations Correspondent Designed data journalism pilot project – that partnered IPS's local journalists in the global south with social science researchers in the UK and data visualizers in the Netherlands, to tell dynamic, human stories about economic and public policy in impoverished areas Contributed to IPS' award-winning coverage on Arms Trade Treaty negotiations, and also on the environment. Covered the 57th annual Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) at U.N. headquarters. Covered U.S.-China Relations. International Peace Institute New York, NY July 2012 – December 2012 Web Editing/ Writing Intern Wrote in-depth policy analysis on the dispute between China and Japan over the Diaoyu/ Senkakuislands in the East China Sea Wrote story on the UN's use of Twitter Maintained Web content on the Global Observatory, a policy analysis website, through Joomla, HTML, and other web tools. I also copy edited, fact checked, and edited pieces by contributors. Global Policy Forum New York, NY January 2012 – July 2012 Research Intern Blogged about international law and tribunals, and about the UN Security Council. Maintained web content through Joomla, HTML, Tumblr, Twitter, Blogspot, and Facebook. Photographed public events and private, high level meetings between Security Council ambassadors and leading NGO representatives. Asian American Writers' Workshop New York, NY January 2011 – 2013) ArnavD Public trust in government is extremely lowPew Research Center 17(May 3) ====Distrust in government causes economic decline==== SummaryNational security comes at the cost of privacy and according to a survey, 74 percent of citizens do not feel like they need to give up civil liberties for national security. Also according to another survey, 80 percent of the people don't trust the government. When there is distrust in the government that leads to economic decline, which harms the economy and leads to more corruption. RecapMeta-dataDronesMuslim SurveillanceGovernment Legitimacy | 6/22/17 |
aff caseTournament: Damus | Round: 2 | Opponent: Rowland Hall-St Marks KO | Judge: Dan Miyamoto Thus, the standard is decreasing structural violence. Reinhardt 2015 in Michigan Law Review: Qualified Immunity amplifies racial discrimination in the criminal justice system—the law must be used to safeguard minority rights. Reinhardt ‘15 Qualified immunity reflects a culture of policing that justifies terrorizing minority neighborhoods and lets police know they can get away with anything. Carter ‘15 Public perception of the judicial system is at an all time low—its treatment of racial minorities is the cause. Reinhardt ‘15 Robinson 11, Public Law and Legal Theory, suggests that Legal legitimacy is key to compliance with the law and maintaining order—turns back ethics based NCs. Robinson 11, Secretary General of the UN, Legal legitimacy is key to promote peace and prevents future conflict. National Coalition against Domestic Violence American Civil Liberties Union, 2015, Police departments fail to investigate domestic violence – DOJ investigations prove. ACLU 12/15 Schtelmakher, civil litigation New York states Qualified immunity is a key obstacle in fighting domestic violence. Shtelmakher 10 Michael Dean, Oakland County attorney, The best way to solve domestic violence is to limit qualified immunity for police officers for domestic violence. TEXT: ACTOR UNKNOWN ought to change the doctrinal formula for qualified immunity replacing the ‘clearly established standard’ and the ‘reasonableness standard’ with a ‘clearly unconstitutional standard for police officers. Today, courts no longer even raise the question of if a constitutional violation occurred. That creates a system of continued rights violations. Aff can solve this by asking the test question on whether conduct was clearly unconstitutional. Reinhardt ‘15 | 11/11/16 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
6/22/17 | arnavdani@gmailcom |
|