Tournament: Woodward | Round: 2 | Opponent: Lake Highland Prep SS | Judge: Nadia Hussein

Text: ~Public colleges and universities in the United States~ should establish restrictions on speech consistent with Peter Byrne's proposal and remove all other restrictions on constitutionally protected speech.

The CP PICs out of hate speech – here's the solvency advocate

J. Peter Byrne 91 ~Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center.~, "Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University," 79 Geo. L.J. 399 (1991), http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1577, ghsBZ
This article examines the constitutionality of university prohibitions of public expression that insults members of
AND
fears and prejudices rather than to respect for others and informed judgment.3

Solves the aff – the counterplan establishes comprehensive definitions, acquittal procedures, and student-faculty panels – key to reversing hateful ideology and empowering excluded groups

J. Peter Byrne 91 ~Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center.~, "Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University," 79 Geo. L.J. 399 (1991), http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1577, ghsBZ
Disciplinary rules are the least effective way that a university can enhance the quality
AND
the educational environment for blameless students against wanton and hurtful ranting.

Solves censorship – hate speech has no truth value but to derogate victims and undercut academic accessibility

J. Peter Byrne 91 ~Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center.~, Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University, 79 Geo. L.J. 399 (1991), http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1577, ghsBZ
The university's first commitment is to truth. As argued above, the uni-
AND
means, for rational argument always has a privileged place in the university.

Laws prohibiting hate speech establish public norms and check prejudice – the aff allows rampant stereotyping and reinforces racist mindsets

Richard Delgado 82 ~J.D. University of California, Berkeley, 1974. Professor of Law, UCLA Law School.~, "WORDS THAT WOUND: A TORT ACTION FOR RACIAL INSULTS, EPITHETS, AND NAME-CALLING," Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, Vol. 17 (1982), http://ssrn.com/abstract=2000918, ghsBZ
Unlike most of the actions for which tort law provides redress to the victim,
AND
racial slurs is a promis- ing vehicle for the eradication of racism.

Tournament: Woodward | Round: 2 | Opponent: Lake Highland Prep SS | Judge: Nadia Hussein

Current protections against hate speech are working – on campus harrassment is decreasing nationally now.

Sutton 16 Halley Sutton, Report shows crime on campus down across the country, Campus Security Report 13.4 (2016), 9/9/16,http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casr.30185/full LADI
A recent report released by the National Center for Education Statistics found an overall decrease
AND
lower than in 2001 for every category except forcible sex offenses and murder.

Expanding constitutionally protected speech sanctions hate speech – the First amendment legitimizes hatred and justifies the right to oppressive speech

Boler 04, Boler, Megan ~Megan Boler is a Full Professor in the Department of Social Justice Education, at the Ontario Institute of Studies in Education (OISE) at the University of Toronto.~. "All Speech Is Not Free: The Ethics of Affirmative Action Pedagogy." Counterpoints 240 (2004): 3-13, ghsBZ
On what basis might one justify an affirmative action pedagogy? The first justifica-
AND
worldviews to be shattered, in itself a pro- foundly emotionally charged experience 

Hate speech inflicts psychological violence across multiple generations and millennia – also justifies mass oppression and primes society for genocide

Delgado and Stefacic '09, Richard Delgado - University Professor, Seattle University School of Law; J.D., 1974, University of California, Berkeley. Jean Stefancic – Research Professor, Seattle University School of Law; M.A., 1989, University of San Francisco. "FOUR OBSERVATIONS ABOUT HATE SPEECH." WAKE FOREST LAW REVIEW. 2009. http://wakeforestlawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Delgado_LawReview_01.09.pdf, ghsBZ
II. OBSERVATION NUMBER TWO: THE EVALUATION OF HARMS HAS BEEN INCOMPLETE One way
AND
at odds with the underlying rationales of a system of free expression.111