| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blake | 1 | any | any |
|
| ||
| Columbia | 2 | any | any |
|
| ||
| Newark | 1 | any | any |
|
| ||
| Newark | 1 | any | any |
|
| ||
| any | 1 | any | any |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
JANFEB - AC - Free SpeechTournament: Blake | Round: 1 | Opponent: any | Judge: any Even narrowly-tailored censorship creates a broad chilling effect on open discussion. Rosenberg 91 Content-based restrictions on public discourse open the doors to cultural authoritarianism. Massey 93 Part two is the Marketplace of Ideas Free speech uniquely valuable and deserving of even more protection in an academic environment. Black 12 Marketplace of ideas protects rights over the long-term and it is on-balance beneficial to rights protection. Bernstein 03 Free speech is key to truth seeking, without it society devolves into stagnation and warfare. Lukianoff 14 Free speech values on campus are key to free speech values in society. Lukianoff 14 Progress depends on free and open dialogue in a marketplace of ideas. Bloomberg 16 Part three is Framing Thus, the standard is maximizing free speech. Theories that can’t create material change in the real world are counter-productive and threaten actual solutions to oppression. Presume aff - There is a presumption against content restrictions. Chemerinsky 09 | 1/5/17 |
JANFEB - AC - Free Speech v2Tournament: Newark | Round: 1 | Opponent: any | Judge: any Our institutions must escape the oppression of consensus. Mouffe 1 An agonistic democracy where difference is respected and all viewpoints are given a chance to engage in the political discourse is key to this end. Mouffe 2 “Envisaged from the ... an ongoing confrontation.” (102) (analytic) Thus, the standard is cultivating agonistic democratic subjects. Theories that can’t create material change in the real world are counter-productive and threaten actual solutions to oppression. There is a presumption against content restrictions – means that the neg needs to actively justify why a restriction on speech is net better. Chemerinsky 09 Part two is the Threat to Thought Even narrowly-tailored censorship creates a broad chilling effect on open discussion. Rosenberg 91 Content-based restrictions on public discourse open the doors to cultural authoritarianism. Massey 93 Universities are not neutral arbiters for social justice – power is used to target marginalized populations. Part three is the Marketplace of Ideas Absent a governmental authority dictating censorship, individual and communal censorship can and will occur. Free speech values on campus are key to free speech values in society. Lukianoff 14 Progress depends on free and open dialogue in a marketplace of ideas. Bloomberg 16 Free speech uniquely valuable and deserving of even more protection in an academic environment. Black 12 Free Speech is necessary to protect marginalized bodies and grant them equality. O’Neill 16 | 1/24/17 |
JANFEB - AC - Free Speech v3Tournament: Columbia | Round: 2 | Opponent: any | Judge: any Thus, the standard is mitigating structural violence. Theories that can’t create material change in the real world are counter-productive and threaten actual solutions to oppression. Part two is the Threat to Thought Even narrowly-tailored censorship creates a broad chilling effect on open discussion. Rosenberg 91 Chilling is happening now – UCLA proves. Lukianoff and Haidt 15 Rights Precedent: restrictions on free speech creates a dangerous slippery slope. Universities should not be the arbiters of communication. Universities are not neutral arbiters for social justice – power is used to target marginalized populations. Arizona university proves – the political is being ceded, means try or die for the aff. King 17 Part three is the Marketplace of Ideas Restrictions on speech hinder minority participation in dialogue first – empirics prove. Friedersdorf 15 Free speech is key to liberatory practices for marginalized bodies – multiple warrants. Friedersdorf 2 The 1AC is key to challenge the broader culture of bigotry – restrictions on hate speech fail – multiple warrants. To clarify, the First Amendment doesn’t permit meaningless obscenity, child pornography, expressions that in and of itself causes injury, and remarks intended to cause violence | 1/24/17 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|