Tournament: Colleyville | Round: 9 | Opponent:  | Judge: 0
A) If the affirmative does not defend resolution as a general principle, they must read a piece of evidence endorsing and describing the implementation of their plan written by an author qualified in the relevant field.

A) The negative debater may not read a parametricized advocacy that excludes one part of the resolution and does another. To clarify, they may not read a plan inclusive counterplan.

Tournament: any | Round: 9 | Opponent: any | Judge: any
hit me up if you have any questions for me.
facebook-Dan Huynh
email-danchuynh22@gmail.com

Tournament: Colleyville | Round: 4 | Opponent: Prosper AA | Judge: Bekah Boyer
Counterplan Text: Aff actors ought to ban private ownership of firearms in college campuses. KGC:  About Us “Gun Lobby Threatens Safety of
America’s Colleges and Universities” by The Campaign to Keep Guns Off Campus http://keepgunsoffcampus.org/about/
“America’s colleges and...and the community"

Offence: First, the presence of handguns on colleges undermines agonistic discourse. They incite aggression and exclude students from engaging in dialogue out of fear. PHW:
public Health Watch Keeping an Eye on the Public Impact of Modern Politics “Point Blank: Guns Don’t Belong On College Campuses – Here’s Why” March 2014
“In order to...the college experience."

Second, the motive behind a handgun assumes a conception of the criminal, which excludes certain social identities from agonistic relationships. TRIVINGO:
Trivingo ‘13. Franco V. Trivingo Guns and Virtue: The Virtue Ethical Case Against Gun Carrying Public Affairs Quarterly Volume 27 Number 4 10/2013
 “For the virtue...or even killed."