Tournament: Harvard | Round: 2 | Opponent: Isha Buddharaju | Judge: Stephanie Ciocca

Sexism is a major problem on Public college and university campuses. Verbal sexual harassment reaffirms society's segregation of the female body and perpetuates the patriarchy. As debaters, it is our duty to combat this societal ideal.

KATHARINE T. BARTLETT* AND JEAN O'BARR Scholarship.law.duke.edu. N. p., 1990. Web. 4 Jan. 2017.
Bartlett 90
Reports of the kind of outrageous, blatantly racist, sexist, or heterosexist events
AND
public telephone, or posters go up celebrating the massacre of Montreal feminists?

Thus, the Role of the Ballot is to vote for the debater who provides the best liberation method for the oppressed.

And the Role of the Judge is to become the liberator that enacts the method.

We have an ethical responsibility to reject patriarchy—it leads to unjust domination.

Nhanenge 07
Jhyette Nhanenge, 2007  (developmental Africa worker), 2007, Retrieved May 30, 2015 from http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/570/dissertation.pdf?sequence=1/ ns
The two characteristic, that benefits in a racist and/or patriarchal society are
AND
even though, paradoxically, the system can only survive on irrational ideologies. 

Links

The aff allows all protected speech - includes sexist speech

CHEMERINSKY 15, ERWIN. "First Amendment's Role Is To Protect Unpopular Speech". The Orange County Register. N. p., 2015. Web. 4 Jan. 2017.
Also, there is no right to engage in speech that causes others to reasonably
AND
2003, the court declared unconstitutional a Virginia law that prohibited cross burning.

The open and PROTECTED sexist speech allows the continued sexism to occur on public college and university campuses and go unchecked. Hearing the sexist speech allows for men to persist in their self-affirmation that sexist behavior is ok

Julie Zeilinger 17 "College Women Sound Off On The Disturbing Sexism They Face Every Day". Mic. N. p., 2015. Web. 4 Jan. 2017.
But while many across the country have acted in ways that have understandably established grounds
AND
, and foster it to occur even more by allowing the sexist speech. 

Impacts

Sexist hate speech has devastating consequences

Snežana Samardžić-Marković1 February 2016 " Assessing The Impact Of Sexist Hate Speech – And What To Do About It". Blog.nohatespeechmovement.org. N. p., 2016. Web. 6 Jan. 2017.
Markovic 16
Sexist hate speech is closely linked to violence against women. Women
AND
drastic action, changing jobs, moving home or even changing their name. 

Outside of those impacts, the sexist hate speech will always foster the continuation and growth of the patriarchy outside of the college campus

Ebert 93 (Teresa, Professor of Humanities at the College of Arts and Sciences at the University at Albany who specializes in Critical and Cultural Theory, Feminist Critique, Marxist Theory and Globalization Theory, "Ludic Feminism, the Body, Performance, and Labor: Bringing 'Materialism' Back into Feminist Cultural Studies" https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1354189.pdf)//meb**
I would like to elaborate, the concept of patriarchy is vital to the struggle
AND
the political economy of differences in postmodern or late capitalist patriarchy in the United 

The Counterplan

Text: Public Colleges and Universities ought to impose a ban on sexist speech as the first step to remove the patriarchy within their campuses and administering equality

The ban on sexist speech will prevent future sexism and start to dismantle the patriarchy

Margarita Salas 10 June 2013 "The False Paradox: Freedom Of Expression And Sexist Hate Speech | Genderit.Org". Genderit.org. N. p., 2017. Web. 6 Jan. 2017.
Salas 13
In contrast, feminist Dona Lilian argues that: "sexist speech
AND
, we each must play our part in putting a stop to this.

It is our duty to eradicate the perpetuating prejudices by banning sexist speech

Snežana Samardžić-Marković2 February 2016 " Assessing The Impact Of Sexist Hate Speech – And What To Do About It". Blog.nohatespeechmovement.org. N. p., 2016. Web. 6 Jan. 2017.
Markovic 16
I can also tell you that Article 12 of our 2011 '
AND
steps to stop the impacts from worsening while the Aff just ignores it.

The speech ban on college campuses will maximize educational equality. Free speech denies equality of education for minority students.

Jill Gordon ~Professor of Philosophy, Colby College~, and Markus Johnson ~Colby College~, "Race, Speech, and a Hostile Education Environment: What Color is Free Speech?" Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 34, No. 3, Fall 2003.

Gordon 03
The grievousness of being denied equality of education is magnified against victims of oppression by
AND
, namely, the proscription of such harassment, not the toleration thereof.

Tournament: Harvard | Round: 2 | Opponent: Isha Buddharaju | Judge: Stephanie Ciocca

We begin with the claim that free speech leads to democratic debate and social progress which is a myth – the Affirmative's faith in the free exchange of ideas displaces a focus on direct action and re-entrenches multiple forms of oppression.  Instead, we must reject the Affirmative's framing of speech and direct pedagogy to focus on direct action against oppression.

Andrew Tillett-Saks (Labor organizer and critical activist author for Truth-Out and Counterpunch), Neoliberal Myths, Counterpunch, 11/7/13,  http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/11/07/neoliberal-myths/
Tillett-Saks 1
In the wake of the Brown University shout-down
AND
To the contrary, ~D~irect action has always proved necessary.

The Affirmative's "Free" speech is not truly free—it is governed by power relations that exclude the experience of minorities

Boler 2000
Boler, Megan (Professor in the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto and editor of Digital Media and Democracy), "All Speech is Not Free: The Ethics of 'Affirmative Action Pedagogy.'" Philosophy of Education. 2000KOHS-AG
All inequities institutionalized through economies, gender roles, social class, and corporate-
AND
in our classrooms, even at the minor cost of limiting dominant voices.

The Affirmative's trivialization of racist speech undermines our project against systemic racism and oppression as a whole.

Racist speech leads to a genocidal increase in crimes against marginalized groups.

Jonathan Greenblatt, When Hateful Speech Leads to Hate Crimes: Taking Bigotry Out of the Immigration Debate, Huffington Post, 8/21/15, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-greenblatt/when-hateful-speech-leads_b_8022966.html
Greenblatt 15
When police arrived at the scene in Boston, they found a
AND
are working with a broad coalition of partners to get the ball rolling.

Our understanding of racism speech and its impacts are defined by dominant cultural discourses. By minimizing the impacts of racism, the Affirmative perpetuates a culture that excludes the experience of minority groups.

(Kim M. Watterson, 'THE POWER OF WORDS: THE POWER OF ADVOCACY CHALLENGING THE POWER OF HATE SPEECH', 1991 by the University of Pittsburgh Law Review; Kim M. Watterson, 52 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 955 University of Pittsburgh Law Review Summer, 1991, JL)

Watterson 1
The right to speak freely and the minimization of the harm of hate speech combine
AND
reckon with difference and the way in which we tend to assume sameness.

The Affirmative's representation of hate speech creates a sense of powerlessness for the victims. By refusing to acknowledge suffering, the Affirmative adds to the injury experienced by all forms of oppression.

We must prioritize the experience of the victim when analyzing instances of oppression. Challenging the dominant discourse is key

(Kim M. Watterson, 'THE POWER OF WORDS: THE POWER OF ADVOCACY CHALLENGING THE POWER OF HATE SPEECH', 1991 by the University of Pittsburgh Law Review; Kim M. Watterson, 52 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 955 University of Pittsburgh Law Review Summer, 1991, JL)

Watterson 2
Minow discusses the "unstated assumptions" that underlie perceptions of, and adjudication about
AND
, involves judging), the lawyer must listen to the voices of others.

Counterplan

Text: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought to restrict the racist element of hate speech on their campuses. This includes blatantly racist dialogue and language that does contribute to education and detracts from the learning atmosphere.

Byrne 1: Byrne, J. Peter. Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center "Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University." Georgetown University Law School, Vol. 79, 1991. RP 

Byrne 1

This article examines
AND
and informed judgment. 

The counterplan competes both textually and functionally—The Affirmative doesn't restrict any speech, we restrict hate speech.

Hate speech poses a direct threat to the oppressed. Banning it is necessary to promote inclusiveness.

Jared Taylor summarizes Waldron, 12, Why We Should Ban "Hate Speech", American Renaissance, summarizing Jeremy Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech, Harvard University Press, 2012, 292 pp., 26.95. 8/24/12, http://www.amren.com/features/2012/08/why-we-should-ban-hate-speech/ ((((Note – Taylor does not agree with but is summarizing Waldron's position))))
Waldron, 12
First-Amendment guarantees of free speech are a cherished part
AND
members of the society to play their part in maintaining this public good.

The counterplan solves – legal sanctions deter behavior

Delgado: Delgado, Richard. Professor of Law, UCLA Law School "Words That Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and Name-Calling." Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review, Volume 17, 1982. RP
Delgado 1
cause of action in tort would create. However, as Professor
AND
tort for racial slurs is a promising vehicle for the eradication of racism.

Tournament: Harvard | Round: 6 | Opponent: Arun Mehra | Judge: Colby Bostick

The Affirmative is a desperate prayer for progress through discourse and reformulation which portrays the future as something amazing and better that we can work toward through discussion and compromise- but it fails to realize that the myth of social progression is used by structures to rewrite history and over look past oppression- talking about issues always fails because oppression exists cyclically operates on a level beyond affective time.  
Dillon  1
Stephen Dillon. "It's here, it's that time:" Race, queer futurity, and the temporality of violence in Born in Flames. University of Minnesota. Women and Performance: A journal of feminist theory, 2013.

In one of the
AND
present become indistinguishable

The Role of the Ballot is to be the critical educator- you and an inqirant looking into the power relations that have formulated oppression over time and affirming a methodology that is capable of resisting them.
Rabinow explains Foucault Rabinow, Paul, "Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, 202”University of Chicago Press

Hence, we must return
AND
these mechanisms are hidden.

The promise of a future free of racism or the idea that talking to racists about out suffering can solve ideology prevents a full confrontation with temporality as accumulation. There is no relief to come in some mystical future where agonism allows freedom. Only understanding time and violence as accumulation and captivity allows us to understand the existing conditions of oppression and come up with solutions.
Dillon 2  Stephen Dillon. “It’s here, it’s that time:” Race, queer futurity, and the temporality of violence in Born in Flames. University of Minnesota. Women and Performance: A journal of feminist theory, 2013

According to Spillers, the
AND
going to happen again.

YOU MISSUNDERSTAND THAT VIOLENCE CANNOT BE SOLVED BY FREE SPEECH BECAUSE IT IS CYCLICAL

If the future is the accumulated past then the only way to destroy the future is the break the present as we know it.
Vote Negative to embrace the incoherence of multiplicity and difference in contrast to the 1ACs focus on coherence, progress and pluralism.

Dillon 3  Stephen Dillon. "It's here, it's that time:" Race, queer futurity, and the temporality of violence in Born in Flames. University of Minnesota. Women and Performance: A journal of feminist theory, 2013.==== 

The temporal break between
AND
as accumulation and capture

Only the alternative has the capacity to change the way violence operates- certain bodies are denied personhood by definition. Legal reformulations and the state's demarcations mean that we need a method to articulate subjectivity and personhood outside of the traditional western order.
Weheliye ~Bracketed for Grammar~ HABEAS VISCUS Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human ALEXANDER G. WEHELIYE Duke University Press Durham and London 2014.p. 48-49

We are in dire
AND
subjugation are administered

Tournament: Harambe Round Robin | Round: Finals | Opponent: God Emperor Favian | Judge: God-Jesus
Best way to reach me is via text. My number is: 713-382-4316
If you cannot reach my cell, send me an email at JoshGeorge7645@hotmail.com or add me on facebook at https://www.facebook.com/joshgeorge773981