Tournament: Harvard | Round: 5 | Opponent: Sarah Grant | Judge: Clint Jones
I affirm the resolution and value morality because ought implies a moral obligation.
Notions of normativity and laws constantly shift through time. All decisions are made with the knowledge that time will inevitably change them.
Hagglund 1
Martin Hagglund. The Necessity of Discrimination Disjoining Derrida and Levinas. Project Muse. Diacritics 34.1:40-71.
Once again, it is
AND
what has been prescribed
Every decision in the Negative world inevitably excludes the perspectives of others and is haunted by those specters of exclusion. We must look toward the Affirmative to reshape this faulty discourse.
Hagglund 2
In effect, every attempt
AND
will call lesser violence
Laws must continually undergo changes to take into account the specters that they have excluded
AND
precisely because ethical norms can be challenged that the Affirmative will solve.
The Affirmative's concept of ethics is the only way to recognize these excluded beings and create meaningful political change. It is precisely because justice and ethics can open to interpretation that it can be changed to always be better. This means that any structural violence frameworks collapse to mine because only re-orienting ethics can have hope for new inclusion.
Hagglund 3
Hence, Derrida argues that
AND
attacks or conflicting demands
Michel ~French post-structuralist~. "Polemics, Politics, and Problematizations." In Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Ed. Paul Rabinow. 1 Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. The New Press. 1998
Foucault 1
The polemicist, on the other
AND
and either surrenders or disappears.
Empirically true- College trends against opposing viewpoints deter meaningful engagement and make a polarized society inevitable.
(Greg Lukainoff is president and CEO of Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, Jonathan Haidt is the Thomas Cooley professor of ethical leadership at NYU Stern. "The Coddling of the American Mind" The Atlantic. 9/15.
Lukianoff and Haidt 1
Burns defines magnification as
AND
the benefit of the doubt
Foucault, Michel ~French post-structuralist~. "Polemics, Politics, and Problematizations." In Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Ed. Paul Rabinow. 1 Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. The New Press. 1998
Foucault 2
It is a question, then
AND
form a community of action.
Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt (Greg Lukainoff is president and CEO of Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, Jonathan Haidt is the Thomas Cooley professor of ethical leadership at NYU Stern. "The Coddling of the American Mind" The Atlantic. 9/15.
Lukianoff and Haidt 2
Attempts to shield students
AND
further serve that goal.
Empirically true- and controls the internal link to any oppression arguments-only discourse allows individuals to challenge norms.
2k1 (Nicholas, Ph.D. from the University of California, lecturer in Political Science @ University of California, “(Re)Turning Derrida to Heidegger: Being-with-Others as Primordial Politics”, Polity, Vol. 33, No. 3 (Spring, 2001), pp. 455-477, Palgrave Macmillan Journals Stable,
Dungey 1
The desire for
AND
designed to separate and isolate.
And we need to engage in institutions- withdrawal allows for oppression and causes no change- this means the Affirmative is key
Chantal, Professor of Political Theory at the Centre for the Study of Democracy, University of Westminster, "The Importance of Engaging the State," What is Radical Politics Today? October 2009, pgs. 233-237~
Mouffe 1
In both Hardt and Negri,
AND
the nature of radical politics.
Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt (Greg Lukianoff is the president and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education and Jonathan Haidt is the Thomas Cooley professor of ethical leadership at the NYU-Stern School of Business), "The Coddling of the American Mind", The Atlantic, 09/2015, www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/
Lukianoff and Haidt 3
As Burns defines it,
AND
only drives them to the polls