Tournament: Harvard Westlake | Round: 3 | Opponent: Harker AnMa | Judge: Akhil Gandra

Social Contract NC

I negate the resolution "Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech."

Definitions

I offer the following definitions:

Public colleges and universities – funded primarily by the government than by tuition

Ought – "moral obligation" by MW

Restrict – "to reduce in quantity or extent of the amount" by MW

Any – "one or more" by MW

Constitutionally protected speech – "Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech" -1st Amendment

Framework

My value is utilitarianism.  To achieve this, my value criterion is preserving the social contract.

The social contract was created between the government and the people.  The people have renounced certain rights to accept the protection the government provides, which is dealt in a utilitarian manner.  Celeste Friend on Rousseau's Social Contract

Friend, Celeste. "Social Contract Theory." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, n.d. Web. 06 Jan. 2017. http://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/~~#SH2c
The Social Contract begins with the most oft-quoted line from Rousseau: "
AND
democratic principles, which is good for us, both individually and collectively.

There is a burden on the affirmative to show that all constitututionally protected speech is good.  The negative has the burden to prove at least one part is bad.  As long as the negative does this, it would prove that it should be restricted.

Contention 1

Hate speech imposes major long term psychological impacts on its victims. Delgado 82

Delgado, Richard (University of Alabama School of Law), "Words that Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and Name-Calling". Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, Vol. 17, p. 133, 1982; Seattle University School of Law Research Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2000918
In addition to the harms of immediate emotional distress and infringement of dignity, racial
AND
," the child will find it difficult not to accept those judgments.76

Studies show hate speech imposes wide-ranging psychological harms on its victim. Jay 9

Timothy Jay (Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts). "Do Offensive Words Harm People?" Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2009, Vol. 15, No. 2, 81–101.https://www.mcla.edu/Assets/uploads/MCLA/import/www.mcla.edu/Undergraduate/uploads/textWidget/1457.00018/documents/DoWordsHarm.pdf
Harms experienced by victims of hateful speech, outlined by Matsuda et al. (
AND
negativity of hate speech directed toward them (Mullen and Smyth, 2004).

Hate speech inflicts pain on the entire targeted community. Kaplin 92

William A Kaplin, ~Professor of Law, Catholic University of America~, "Hate Speech on the College Campus: Freedom of Speech and Equality at the Crossroads," Winston Howard Lecture, Land and Water Law Review, 1992.
On another level, hate speech inflicts pain on the broader class of persons who
AND
hair …" In the margins of their notebooks, I am obliterated.'

The Affirmative trivializes the harms certain speech cause. Fish 94

Fish, Stanley. "There's No Such Thing As Free Speech And Its A Good Thing Too." Oxford University Press. 1994. Web. December 07, 2016. https://www.english.upenn.edu/~~cavitch/pdf-library/Fish_FreeSpeech.pdf.
~These~ Arguments like Schmidt's only get their purchase by first imaging speech as
AND
be maintained, at least within the confines of Schmidt's carefully denatured discourse. 

Hate speech negatively effects the victims and the people around them.  The government controls public colleges and universities.  By utilitarian calculus, free speech must be balanced with the harms certain speech cause because certain rights must be restrained for the good of the people.

Contention 2

Hate speech obstructs ability of group members to benefit from equal educational opportunities. Kaplin 92

William A Kaplin, ~Professor of Law, Catholic University of America~, "Hate Speech on the College Campus: Freedom of Speech and Equality at the Crossroads," Winston Howard Lecture, Land and Water Law Review, 1992.
Sixth, a university might be able to regulate certain types of hate speech that
AND
provide sanctions against student organiza-tions as well as against individual students.

Racist speech harms the educational environment. Post 91

Robert C. Post, ~Professor of Law, School of Law, University of California at Berkeley~, "Racist Speech, Democracy, and the First Amendment," William and Mary Law Review, 1990-1991
Each of the four categories of harm so far discussed can be caused by racist
AND
the particular educational values that specific colleges or universities seek to instill.5

As the government's job is to protect the community, the purpose of universities is to learn.  Because public colleges and universities are government-funded, as the government must balance individual rights to fulfill their purpose, the universities must also balance individual rights for their purpose.

Tournament: Stanford | Round: 1 | Opponent: Legacy AC | Judge: Steve Clemmons
Social Contract NC
I negate the resolution "Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech."
Definitions

I offer the following definitions:
Public colleges and universities – funded primarily by the government than by tuition
Ought – "moral obligation" by MW
Restrict – "to reduce in quantity or extent of the amount" by MW
Any – "one or more" by MW
Constitutionally protected speech – "Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech" -1st Amendment
Framework

My value is utilitarianism.  To achieve this, my value criterion is preserving the social contract.
The social contract was created between the government and the people.  The people have renounced certain rights to accept the protection the government provides, which is dealt in a utilitarian manner.  Celeste Friend on Rousseau's Social Contract
Friend, Celeste. "Social Contract Theory." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, n.d. Web. 06 Jan. 2017. http://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/~~#SH2c
The Social Contract begins with the most oft-quoted line from Rousseau: "
AND
democratic principles, which is good for us, both individually and collectively.

There is a burden on the affirmative to show that all constitututionally protected speech is good.  The negative has the burden to prove at least one part is bad.  As long as the negative does this, it would prove that it should be restricted.
Contention 1

Hate speech imposes major long term psychological impacts on its victims. Delgado 82
Delgado, Richard (University of Alabama School of Law), "Words that Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and Name-Calling". Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, Vol. 17, p. 133, 1982; Seattle University School of Law Research Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2000918
In addition to the harms of immediate emotional distress and infringement of dignity, racial
AND
," the child will find it difficult not to accept those judgments.76

Studies show hate speech imposes wide-ranging psychological harms on its victim. Jay 9
Timothy Jay (Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts). "Do Offensive Words Harm People?" Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2009, Vol. 15, No. 2, 81–101.https://www.mcla.edu/Assets/uploads/MCLA/import/www.mcla.edu/Undergraduate/uploads/textWidget/1457.00018/documents/DoWordsHarm.pdf
Harms experienced by victims of hateful speech, outlined by Matsuda et al. (
AND
negativity of hate speech directed toward them (Mullen and Smyth, 2004).

Hate speech inflicts pain on the entire targeted community. Kaplin 92
William A Kaplin, Professor of Law, Catholic University of America, "Hate Speech on the College Campus: Freedom of Speech and Equality at the Crossroads," Winston Howard Lecture, Land and Water Law Review, 1992.
On another level, hate speech inflicts pain on the broader class of persons who
AND
hair …" In the margins of their notebooks, I am obliterated.'

The Affirmative trivializes the harms certain speech cause. Fish 94
Fish, Stanley. "There's No Such Thing As Free Speech And Its A Good Thing Too." Oxford University Press. 1994. Web. December 07, 2016. https://www.english.upenn.edu/~~cavitch/pdf-library/Fish_FreeSpeech.pdf.
These Arguments like Schmidt's only get their purchase by first imaging speech as
AND
be maintained, at least within the confines of Schmidt's carefully denatured discourse. 

Hate speech negatively effects the victims and the people around them.  The government controls public colleges and universities.  By utilitarian calculus, free speech must be balanced with the harms certain speech cause because certain rights must be restrained for the good of the people.
Contention 2

Hate speech obstructs ability of group members to benefit from equal educational opportunities. Kaplin 92
William A Kaplin, Professor of Law, Catholic University of America, "Hate Speech on the College Campus: Freedom of Speech and Equality at the Crossroads," Winston Howard Lecture, Land and Water Law Review, 1992.
Sixth, a university might be able to regulate certain types of hate speech that
AND
provide sanctions against student organiza-tions as well as against individual students.

Racist speech harms the educational environment. Post 91
Robert C. Post, Professor of Law, School of Law, University of California at Berkeley, "Racist Speech, Democracy, and the First Amendment," William and Mary Law Review, 1990-1991
Each of the four categories of harm so far discussed can be caused by racist
AND
the particular educational values that specific colleges or universities seek to instill.5

As the government's job is to protect the community, the purpose of universities is to learn.  Because public colleges and universities are government-funded, as the government must balance individual rights to fulfill their purpose, the universities must also balance individual rights for their purpose.

Tournament: Stanford | Round: 3 | Opponent: San Marino AL | Judge: Rugved Karhade
Social Contract NC
I negate the resolution "Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech."
Definitions

I offer the following definitions:
Public colleges and universities – funded primarily by the government than by tuition
Ought – "moral obligation" by MW
Restrict – "to reduce in quantity or extent of the amount" by MW
Any – "one or more" by MW
Constitutionally protected speech – "Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech" -1st Amendment
Framework

My value is utilitarianism.  To achieve this, my value criterion is preserving the social contract.
The social contract was created between the government and the people.  The people have renounced certain rights to accept the protection the government provides, which is dealt in a utilitarian manner.  Celeste Friend on Rousseau's Social Contract
Friend, Celeste. "Social Contract Theory." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, n.d. Web. 06 Jan. 2017. http://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/~~#SH2c
The Social Contract begins with the most oft-quoted line from Rousseau: "
AND
democratic principles, which is good for us, both individually and collectively.

There is a burden on the affirmative to show that all constitututionally protected speech is good.  The negative has the burden to prove at least one part is bad.  As long as the negative does this, it would prove that it should be restricted.
Contention 1

Hate speech imposes major long term psychological impacts on its victims. Delgado 82
Delgado, Richard (University of Alabama School of Law), "Words that Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and Name-Calling". Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, Vol. 17, p. 133, 1982; Seattle University School of Law Research Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2000918
In addition to the harms of immediate emotional distress and infringement of dignity, racial
AND
," the child will find it difficult not to accept those judgments.76

Studies show hate speech imposes wide-ranging psychological harms on its victim. Jay 9
Timothy Jay (Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts). "Do Offensive Words Harm People?" Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2009, Vol. 15, No. 2, 81–101.https://www.mcla.edu/Assets/uploads/MCLA/import/www.mcla.edu/Undergraduate/uploads/textWidget/1457.00018/documents/DoWordsHarm.pdf
Harms experienced by victims of hateful speech, outlined by Matsuda et al. (
AND
negativity of hate speech directed toward them (Mullen and Smyth, 2004).

Hate speech inflicts pain on the entire targeted community. Kaplin 92
William A Kaplin, Professor of Law, Catholic University of America, "Hate Speech on the College Campus: Freedom of Speech and Equality at the Crossroads," Winston Howard Lecture, Land and Water Law Review, 1992.
On another level, hate speech inflicts pain on the broader class of persons who
AND
hair …" In the margins of their notebooks, I am obliterated.'

The Affirmative trivializes the harms certain speech cause. Fish 94
Fish, Stanley. "There's No Such Thing As Free Speech And Its A Good Thing Too." Oxford University Press. 1994. Web. December 07, 2016. https://www.english.upenn.edu/~~cavitch/pdf-library/Fish_FreeSpeech.pdf.
These Arguments like Schmidt's only get their purchase by first imaging speech as
AND
be maintained, at least within the confines of Schmidt's carefully denatured discourse. 

Hate speech negatively effects the victims and the people around them.  The government controls public colleges and universities.  By utilitarian calculus, free speech must be balanced with the harms certain speech cause because certain rights must be restrained for the good of the people.
Contention 2

Hate speech obstructs ability of group members to benefit from equal educational opportunities. Kaplin 92
William A Kaplin, Professor of Law, Catholic University of America, "Hate Speech on the College Campus: Freedom of Speech and Equality at the Crossroads," Winston Howard Lecture, Land and Water Law Review, 1992.
Sixth, a university might be able to regulate certain types of hate speech that
AND
provide sanctions against student organiza-tions as well as against individual students.

Racist speech harms the educational environment. Post 91
Robert C. Post, Professor of Law, School of Law, University of California at Berkeley, "Racist Speech, Democracy, and the First Amendment," William and Mary Law Review, 1990-1991
Each of the four categories of harm so far discussed can be caused by racist
AND
the particular educational values that specific colleges or universities seek to instill.5

As the government's job is to protect the community, the purpose of universities is to learn.  Because public colleges and universities are government-funded, as the government must balance individual rights to fulfill their purpose, the universities must also balance individual rights for their purpose.

Tournament: Harvard Westlake | Round: 1 | Opponent: Immaculate Heart MC | Judge: Rebecca Kuang
Social Contract NC
I negate the resolution "Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech."
Definitions

I offer the following definitions:
Public colleges and universities – funded primarily by the government than by tuition
Ought – "moral obligation" by MW
Restrict – "to reduce in quantity or extent of the amount" by MW
Any – "one or more" by MW
Constitutionally protected speech – "Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech" -1st Amendment
Framework

My value is utilitarianism.  To achieve this, my value criterion is preserving the social contract.
The social contract was created between the government and the people.  The people have renounced certain rights to accept the protection the government provides, which is dealt in a utilitarian manner.  Celeste Friend on Rousseau's Social Contract
Friend, Celeste. "Social Contract Theory." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, n.d. Web. 06 Jan. 2017. http://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/~~#SH2c
The Social Contract begins with the most oft-quoted line from Rousseau: "
AND
democratic principles, which is good for us, both individually and collectively.

There is a burden on the affirmative to show that all constitututionally protected speech is good.  The negative has the burden to prove at least one part is bad.  As long as the negative does this, it would prove that it should be restricted.
Contention 1

Hate speech imposes major long term psychological impacts on its victims. Delgado 82
Delgado, Richard (University of Alabama School of Law), "Words that Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and Name-Calling". Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, Vol. 17, p. 133, 1982; Seattle University School of Law Research Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2000918
In addition to the harms of immediate emotional distress and infringement of dignity, racial
AND
," the child will find it difficult not to accept those judgments.76

Studies show hate speech imposes wide-ranging psychological harms on its victim. Jay 9
Timothy Jay (Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts). "Do Offensive Words Harm People?" Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2009, Vol. 15, No. 2, 81–101.https://www.mcla.edu/Assets/uploads/MCLA/import/www.mcla.edu/Undergraduate/uploads/textWidget/1457.00018/documents/DoWordsHarm.pdf
Harms experienced by victims of hateful speech, outlined by Matsuda et al. (
AND
negativity of hate speech directed toward them (Mullen and Smyth, 2004).

Hate speech inflicts pain on the entire targeted community. Kaplin 92
William A Kaplin, Professor of Law, Catholic University of America, "Hate Speech on the College Campus: Freedom of Speech and Equality at the Crossroads," Winston Howard Lecture, Land and Water Law Review, 1992.
On another level, hate speech inflicts pain on the broader class of persons who
AND
hair …" In the margins of their notebooks, I am obliterated.'

The Affirmative trivializes the harms certain speech cause. Fish 94
Fish, Stanley. "There's No Such Thing As Free Speech And Its A Good Thing Too." Oxford University Press. 1994. Web. December 07, 2016. https://www.english.upenn.edu/~~cavitch/pdf-library/Fish_FreeSpeech.pdf.
These Arguments like Schmidt's only get their purchase by first imaging speech as
AND
be maintained, at least within the confines of Schmidt's carefully denatured discourse. 

Hate speech negatively effects the victims and the people around them.  The government controls public colleges and universities.  By utilitarian calculus, free speech must be balanced with the harms certain speech cause because certain rights must be restrained for the good of the people.
Contention 2

Hate speech obstructs ability of group members to benefit from equal educational opportunities. Kaplin 92
William A Kaplin, Professor of Law, Catholic University of America, "Hate Speech on the College Campus: Freedom of Speech and Equality at the Crossroads," Winston Howard Lecture, Land and Water Law Review, 1992.
Sixth, a university might be able to regulate certain types of hate speech that
AND
provide sanctions against student organiza-tions as well as against individual students.

Racist speech harms the educational environment. Post 91
Robert C. Post, Professor of Law, School of Law, University of California at Berkeley, "Racist Speech, Democracy, and the First Amendment," William and Mary Law Review, 1990-1991
Each of the four categories of harm so far discussed can be caused by racist
AND
the particular educational values that specific colleges or universities seek to instill.5

As the government's job is to protect the community, the purpose of universities is to learn.  Because public colleges and universities are government-funded, as the government must balance individual rights to fulfill their purpose, the universities must also balance individual rights for their purpose.