Tournament: Berk Invitational | Round: 4 | Opponent: west ranch | Judge: john overing
1AC
Contention 1
Status-quo restrictions on free speech trace a definitive path to the left redefining words and controlling speech to covertly further its agenda under an illusion of social justice.
Jacobson 16
Daniel, prof of philosophy @ Michigan, Freedom of Speech under Assault on Campus, CATO POLICY ANALYSIS NO. 796, 8-30-16, Premier

Speech restrictions face a line-drawing problem – first it’s hate speech then it’s climate denialism then anything goes… This is a key deficit towards exposing ideological agendas.
Dalmia 16
Shikha Dalmia, Reason magazine, “Debating NYU's Jeremy Waldron on Free Speech vs. Hate Speech on College Campuses” http://reason.com/blog/2016/09/22/debating-nyus-jeremy-waldron-on-free-spe Premier

Free speech restrictions are tantamount to the securitization of thought; this reinforces ideological doctrines deep within academia. The scheme of what educators frame as ‘progressive thought’ errs the student into a stigma against transparency- cultivating insecurities and a sick façade of “education.”
Burleigh 16
Nina Burleigh, Newsweek, “The Battle Against 'Hate Speech' on College Campuses Gives Rise to a Generation That Hates Speech” 6-3-16, Proquest. Premier

Restrictions on speech feature a cultivation of systemic governmental oppression, stifling progression and dehumanizing those that it deems unworthy of participation- a crackdown and manipulation of kritikal consciousness.
Freire ’70 Paulo Friere, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Chapter 1, educator and director of the Department of Cultural  Extension of Recife University,1970

Contention 2- Advocacy
Text: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought to not restrict free speech for engagement in the Freirean model of a kritikal pedagogy.
Explanation: A kritikal pedagogy is a blueprint for teaching that emphasizes modes of expression that lets academics circulate out of potential ideologies that the public college or university may be complicit with- it varies in implementation and is phrased by Paulo Freire to solve oppressive mindsets especially. 

Contention 3- Solvency
A Neolib:
Solvency for ideological agendas are a key function of pedagogy in the public college and university to combat neoliberalism
Polychroniuo interviewing Giroux ’13 C.J. and Henry A. (C.J. Polychroniou is a political economist/political scientist who has taught and worked in universities and research centers in Europe and the United States. Henry A. Giroux currently holds the Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department.) Neoliberalism and the Politics of Higher Education: An Interview With Henry A. Giroux, Truthout, March 26,2013, Date Accessed 12/20/16, http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/15237-predatory-capitalism-and-the-attack-on-higher-education-an-interview-with-henry-a-giroux Premier

B Oppression
Absolute free speech lets opinions clash, fostering a kritikal environment, prying the barriers off of students that want to change the world around them.
Wolf ’14 Gertrud Wolf Dr Gertrud Wolf is head of the department Online and Distance Learning at the Protestant Centre for Distance Learning (Comenius-Insititut, Germany) and InfoNet correspondent for Science., 7-3-2014, "Paulo Freire: Pedagogy between oppression and liberation," ELU: European Lifelong Learning, http://www.infonet-ae.eu/articles-science-55/2142-paulo-freire-pedagogy-between-oppression-and-liberation

Dialogue is key to this movement so that the grasps the status quo promotes can be loosened to the point of liberation.
Freire ‘68 (Paulo Freire. Educational Revolutionary. “Pedagogy of the Oppressed”.)

Having communication is a kritikal environment is key to its success.
Freire ‘68 (Paulo Freire. Educational Revolutionary. “Pedagogy of the Oppressed”. Pg77)

4- Framing
It is TRY or DIE for the affirmative. The lack of free speech causes echo-chambers that negatively impact student’s education and hardwire the student to the antagonistic norms of the ideology a university may be complicit with.
Kelly-Woessner 16
KELLY-WOESSNER, APRIL. (Woessner is a professor and chairwoman of the political science department at Elizabethtown College) "The Fierce Debate over Free Speech on American College Campuses." LancasterOnline. N.p., 18 Sept. 2016. Web. 10 Jan. 2017. http://lancasteronline.com/opinion/columnists/the-fierce-debate-over-free-speech-on-american-college-campuses/article_8c208d66-7b65-11e6-88de-d78bce73d4c3.html. Premier

Neolib
Neoliberal globalization is a protection racket—it’s the root cause of every major impact
Naidu 98(MV, PhD Poli Sci, Peace Research 30.2 (May 1998): 1. proquest)

Oppression
Dialogical recognition for the oppressed is key to solvency
Freire ‘68 (Paulo Freire. Educational Revolutionary. “Pedagogy of the Oppressed”. Pg 46- 47)

Must reject every instance of racism --- impact’s violence and dehumanization
Memmi ‘97(Albert Professor Emeritus of Sociology, University of Paris RACISM, 1997, p. 163. (DRGCL/B1048))

Tournament: Berkeley Invitational | Round: 1 | Opponent: cherry creek | Judge:
The value is justice and the value criterion is deconstructing militarism. Justice is giving each their due, which cannot occur in a state of oppression.
The underlying reason you would want vote for this value calculus is because through war, militarism structures all inequalities—not the other way around
John Horgan, Director of the Center for Science Writings at the Stevens Institute of Technology, 2012, The End of War, Chapter 5, Kindle p. 1600-1659

My thesis and sole contention is that campus activism is necessary to resist the push towards warfare. We need to allow students to express themselves freely, or else we risk justifying costly and unnecessary wars.

First- Uniqueness: In the status quo, the student anti-militarism movement is back and growing – but colleges are cracking down. Ending the crackdown is key to the survival of the movement.
SW ‘05 (Socialist Workers) Cracking down on student protests, International Socialist Review10-7-2005 AT

Specifically, free speech zones stifle free speech. Rather than creating a space for speech, they confine dissent to overlooked corners of university campuses, where it is no longer effective. This regime of restrictions on free speech uses military tactics to suppress open debate and political dissent.
Elmer ‘08 (Greg Elmer, associate professor of communication and culture at Ryerson University, PhD in communication from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, director of the Infoscape Research Lab at Ryerson University, Andy Opel, associate professor of communication at Florida State University, PhD in mass communication from the University of North Carolina, member of the International Communication Association, November 2008, “Preempting Dissent: The Politics of an Inevitable Future,” pages 29-41) 

Second- Solvency: Political protest against war shifts national ideologies and can bring costly wars to an end
Lieberfield 08 Daniel Lieberfeld “WHAT MAKES AN EFFECTIVE ANTIWAR MOVEMENT? THEME-ISSUE INTRODUCTION” International Journal of Peace Studies, Volume 13, Number 1, Spring/Summer 2008 AT

AND Student Protest in Campuses specifically allows for the instigation of dissent and questioning of the militarism in the departments in the University that fuel the war—Vietnam War proves
Tilly et. Al. ‘99 Marco Giugni, Doug McAdam, Charles Tilly. (1999). How Social Movements Matter. University of Minnesota Press. AS 

Even if you don’t buy our internal links- the aff creates a snowball effect:  Colleges are the missing link in the expanding counter-movement to militarism – campus anti-war activism has failed to materialize, but is necessary to support broader global movements and turn the tide against the culture of US militarism
Harding and Kershner 11 (Scott Harding School of Social Work, University of Connecticut; and Seth Kershner, Simmons College) “Just say No”: Organizing Against Militarism in Public Schools” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare Vol. 38  Iss. 2 (2011) AT