Dougherty Valley Dubey Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berk Invitational | 4 | west ranch | john overing |
|
| ||
| Berk Invitational | 5 | loyola | james braden |
|
|
| |
| Berkeley Invitational | 1 | cherry creek |
|
|
| ||
| Novice Nats | 2 | Los Altos | Nick Steele |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Berk Invitational | 5 | Opponent: loyola | Judge: james braden NC was 2 off cap and disclosure |
| Berkeley Invitational | 1 | Opponent: cherry creek | Judge: 1ac Militarism KD mod |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
1ac Freire v2Tournament: Berk Invitational | Round: 4 | Opponent: west ranch | Judge: john overing Speech restrictions face a line-drawing problem – first it’s hate speech then it’s climate denialism then anything goes… This is a key deficit towards exposing ideological agendas. Free speech restrictions are tantamount to the securitization of thought; this reinforces ideological doctrines deep within academia. The scheme of what educators frame as ‘progressive thought’ errs the student into a stigma against transparency- cultivating insecurities and a sick façade of “education.” Restrictions on speech feature a cultivation of systemic governmental oppression, stifling progression and dehumanizing those that it deems unworthy of participation- a crackdown and manipulation of kritikal consciousness. Contention 2- Advocacy Contention 3- Solvency B Oppression Dialogue is key to this movement so that the grasps the status quo promotes can be loosened to the point of liberation. Having communication is a kritikal environment is key to its success. 4- Framing Neolib Oppression Must reject every instance of racism --- impact’s violence and dehumanization | 2/19/17 |
1ac Freire v3Tournament: Berk Invitational | Round: 5 | Opponent: loyola | Judge: james braden Speech restrictions face a line-drawing problem – first it’s hate speech then it’s climate denialism then anything goes… This is a key deficit towards exposing ideological agendas. Free speech restrictions are tantamount to the securitization of thought; this reinforces ideological doctrines deep within academia. The scheme of what educators frame as ‘progressive thought’ errs the student into a stigma against transparency- cultivating insecurities and a sick façade of “education.” Restrictions on speech feature a cultivation of systemic governmental oppression, stifling progression and dehumanizing those that it deems unworthy of participation- a crackdown and manipulation of kritikal consciousness. Contention 2- Advocacy Contention 3- Solvency Solvency for ideological agendas are a key function of pedagogy in the public college and university to combat neoliberalism Dialogue is key to this movement so that the grasps the status quo promotes can be loosened to the point of liberation. Having communication is a kritikal environment is key to its success. 4- Framing Neolib | 2/19/17 |
1ac Militarism tradTournament: Berkeley Invitational | Round: 1 | Opponent: cherry creek | Judge: My thesis and sole contention is that campus activism is necessary to resist the push towards warfare. We need to allow students to express themselves freely, or else we risk justifying costly and unnecessary wars. First- Uniqueness: In the status quo, the student anti-militarism movement is back and growing – but colleges are cracking down. Ending the crackdown is key to the survival of the movement. Specifically, free speech zones stifle free speech. Rather than creating a space for speech, they confine dissent to overlooked corners of university campuses, where it is no longer effective. This regime of restrictions on free speech uses military tactics to suppress open debate and political dissent. Second- Solvency: Political protest against war shifts national ideologies and can bring costly wars to an end AND Student Protest in Campuses specifically allows for the instigation of dissent and questioning of the militarism in the departments in the University that fuel the war—Vietnam War proves Even if you don’t buy our internal links- the aff creates a snowball effect: Colleges are the missing link in the expanding counter-movement to militarism – campus anti-war activism has failed to materialize, but is necessary to support broader global movements and turn the tide against the culture of US militarism | 2/19/17 |
1ac Militarism v2Tournament: Novice Nats | Round: 2 | Opponent: Los Altos | Judge: Nick Steele The underlying reason you would want vote for this value calculus is because through war, militarism structures all inequalities—not the other way around Also, solvency is TRY OR DIE for global resistance to militarism- a brutal eruption of warfare and fascistic violence will soon engulf the globe – but the conditions are ripe for an equally powerful opposition movement to prevent global catastrophe My thesis and sole contention is that campus activism is necessary to resist the push towards warfare. We need to allow students to express themselves freely, or else we risk justifying costly and unnecessary wars. First- Uniqueness: In the status quo, the student anti-militarism movement is back and growing – but colleges are cracking down. Ending the crackdown is key to the survival of the movement. Next, Public colleges are complicit with militarism, they criminalize protesting against wars in order to construct support for unpopular wars. Specifically, free speech zones stifle free speech. Rather than creating a space for speech, they confine dissent to overlooked corners of university campuses, where it is no longer effective. This regime of restrictions on free speech uses military tactics to suppress open debate and political dissent. Second- Solvency: Political protest against war shifts national ideologies and can bring costly wars to an end AND Student Protest in Campuses specifically allows for the instigation of dissent and questioning of the militarism in the departments in the University that fuel the war—Vietnam War proves Even if you don’t buy our internal links- the aff creates a snowball effect: Colleges are the missing link in the expanding counter-movement to militarism – campus anti-war activism has failed to materialize, but is necessary to support broader global movements and turn the tide against the culture of US militarism Underview
| 3/12/17 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|