| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any | 1 | any | any |
|
| ||
| Grapevine | 2 | Harvard-Westlake MG | Kris Wright |
|
| ||
| Grapevine | 3 | Hockaday ES | Abbey Chapman |
|
| ||
| Grapevine | 3 | Hockaday ES | Abbey Chapman |
|
| ||
| StMarks | 1 | Strake Jesuit CP | Sujay Singh |
|
| ||
| University of Houston | 1 | Klein VB | Hollis Gay |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
Jan-Feb Oppression ACTournament: University of Houston | Round: 1 | Opponent: Klein VB | Judge: Hollis Gay FWI affirm, I value morality because ought denotes a moral obligation.In order for morality to be act functional, it must be able to recognize subjective differences between individuals. Absent an examination of individual differences, ethics becomes a tool to dominate and is useless as an impartial guide to action.Young:Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1990. Print. CM This requires a reconciliation between different group's values. Embracing pluralism is key to acknowledging the social oppression of heterogeneous groups.Young 2:Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1990. Print. CM Multiple impacts:Controls the internal link to any ethical system- ethics cannot operate if they exclude voices because they would be incomplete and arbitrary. Arbitrariness is a side constraint on ethical theories, because if they could exclude voices they would never be able to be a guide to action because they wouldn't be able to prescribe consistent rules.Excluding voices reinforces hierarchies which inherently privileges the have's in society over the have not'sANDvoices in the political system is the only way to create ethical rules.In round activism against oppressive and dominating structures allows the debate space to function as training ground for the real world. This allows debaters to go into the world and make productive change.Polson:Dana Roe Polson, PhD in Language Literacy and Culture, UMBC, Baltimore city public and public charter schools high school teacher, "'Longing for Theory:' Performance Debate in Action" Dissertain directed by Dr. Christine Mallinson, Assistant Professor, Language, Literacy, and Culture pp. 16-18 Ideal theory can't guide action since its starting point has diverged from the descriptive model of the real world. Non-ideal theory is key for ethical motivation.MILLS:Charles W. Mills, "Ideal Theory" as Ideology, 2005 Thus the standard is resisting structural violence.Observation: Universities are the most important site of first amendment activity.Goodman 5:( S. Mark Goodman, Michael C. Hiestand, Student Press Law Center 2005 WL 2736314 (U.S.) (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) Supreme Court of the United States. Margaret L. HOSTY, Jeni S. Porche, and Steven P. Barba, Petitioners, v. Patricia CARTER, Respondent. No. 05-377. October 20, 2005. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Brief of Amici Curiae Student Press Law Center, Associated Collegiate Press, College Media Advisers, Community College Journalism Association, Society for Collegiate Journalists, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, American Society of Newspaper Editors, National Newspaper Association, Newspaper Association of America, Society of Professional Journalists, Associated Press Managing Editors, College Newspaper Business and Advertising Managers, National Federation of Press Women, National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association and the Independent Press Association/Campus Journalism Project in Support of Petition of Margaret L. Hosty, Jeni S. Porche, and Steven P. Barba for Writ of Certiorari Of Counsel: S. Mark Goodman, Michael C. Hiestand, Student Press Law Center, 1101 Wilson Blvd., Ste 1100, Arlington, VA 22209-2211, (703) 807-1904. Richard M. Goehler, (Counsel of Record), Frost Brown Todd LLC, 2200 PNC Center, 201 East Fifth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, (513) 651-6800, Counsel for Amici Curiae.) Contention one – co-optionCensorship allows our own logic to get co-opted crushing social movements.Adler '96:(Adler, Amy. "Whats Left?: Hate Speech, Pornography, And The Problem For Artistic Expression." California Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 6. December 1996. Web. December 07, 2016. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3481093.) Contention two – educationProhibitions creates conformist ideology that spills over into creating the mindless student.Uelmen '90:A pro-con discussion of speech codes and free speech Campus Hate Speech Codes Gerald Uelmen https://www.scu.edu/character/resources/campus-hate-speech-codes/ Markkula Center for Applied Ethics A~ Limiting opinions precludes our ability to think critically which is key to challenging hegemonic ideals. Professors are in a unique position to influence thought towards stopping echo chambers that contribute to widening gaps in political opinion, which polarize politics to the point of deadlock and an inability to face the facts.B~ The chilling effect on free speech dismantles the free marketplace of ideas, which reduces innovation and intellectual discovery, controlling the internal link to stopping hate speech: the only way that activists have galvanized support for anti-oppressive agendas is through free speech; that's how we've been able to determine what's offensive and what's not. Negating stops activism in its tracks.Contention three – exitable speechArbitrary determinations of what speech is good versus whats bad locks trauma of the oppression in the words themselves not to the bad people.Butler:Butler, Judith (Professor of Rhetoric and Comparative Literature, University of California-Berkeley), Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative, Routledge, 1997. Censorship is guaranteed to fail – injurious speech just becomes recirculated.Butler ~2~:"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD A. Censorship destroys resistance and survival methods by closing off the ability to appropriate, making censorship's benefit is non-unique.B. Censorship can't solve for its own impacts. Using the rhetoric becomes necessary in criticism against the speech. This is particularly true in a legal context that proliferates the utterance in policy.C. This outweighs- directly kills any solvency censorship could have and it turns the link on a long-term basis. The recirculation of speech ensures its survival in language. This is specifically true in the context of censorship critique since it requires deploying the speech in its context. Instead we should appropriate.Contention four – journalismCensorship of student journalism happening now which discourages government critique.Schuman '16:(Rebecca, http://www.slate.com/articles/life/education/2016/12/student_journalists_are_under_threat.html) | 1/7/17 |
Sept- Oct Pacific Islanders ACTournament: StMarks | Round: 1 | Opponent: Strake Jesuit CP | Judge: Sujay Singh In order for morality to be act functional, it must be able to recognize subjective differences between individuals. Absent an examination of individual differences, ethics becomes a tool to dominate and is useless as an impartial guide to action.Young: This requires reconciliation between different groups values. Embracing pluralism is key to acknowledging the social oppression of heterogeneous groups.Young 2: Material solutions outweigh abstract solutions because ideal theories fail to account for personal identity and marginalized groups.Curry '14: People need to be able to critically deconstruct representations of themselves and their identity to understand cultural politics and power. Giroux: Contention 1) Nuclear power is being tested on Pacific Islanders.Istar '05 Contention 2) This testing causes grotesque effects on the civiliansNuclear testing has turned children into jellyfishBeacham '92 Nuclear radiation is resulting in genocide of Marshall IslandersBlair '10 This problem is still persisting – it's try or die.Koehler '12 Contention 3) The only solvency is to get rid of all things nuclearIstar '05 The US has a legal obligation to protect the people of MicronesiaBeacham '92 | 10/15/16 |
Sept-Oct Natives ACTournament: Grapevine | Round: 3 | Opponent: Hockaday ES | Judge: Abbey Chapman In order for morality to be act functional, it must be able to recognize subjective differences between individuals. Absent an examination of individual differences, ethics becomes a tool to dominate and is useless as an impartial guide to action.Young:Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ Ts.Young 2:Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1990. Print. CM Multiple impacts:analytic Excluding voices reinforces hierarchies which inherently privileges the have's in society over the have not'sANDContention– HazzardSubpoint A) Mill taling poses the greatest threat to reservationsNelkin 1 Subpoint B) Tailing is hazardous to the water supply to the Navajo reservationNelkin 2 Subpoint c) Many tribes fear the aftermath of nuclear waste sitesLewis 1 Contention – culture integritySubpoint A) The Environment is a huge part of Native cultureLewis 2 Subpoint B polices harms the indigenous cultureNelkin Subpoint C) Drilling effects sacred native lands and causes social and distributional problemsNelkin SolvencyNative American tribes ought to prohibit from producing nuclear power on their reservations.Native tribes already have sovereignty And Native Tribes want to remove nuclear power from their landsKamps | 10/19/16 |
Sept-Oct Radiation ACTournament: Grapevine | Round: 2 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake MG | Judge: Kris Wright Frame workWhen obligation is contextualized in terms of government actors, the only system of ethics that is democratically justifiable is utilitarianism.====Woller:==== Thus, the standard is maximizing expected well being. | 10/15/16 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|