Tournament: Blake | Round: 1 | Opponent: Valley BG | Judge: Eric Weine
See open source.

Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Asheville CD | Judge: Boyang Zhou
See open source.

Tournament: Emory | Round: 4 | Opponent: Palo Alto CF | Judge: Luis Carrera
See open source.

Tournament: Tournament of Champions | Round: 1 | Opponent: Valley TG | Judge: Sheryl Kaczmarek
See open source.

Tournament: Disclosure | Round: Quads | Opponent: You | Judge: Any
A. Interpretation: All debaters who attended at least 2 bid tournaments last season or this season must disclose all previously read positions on the current topic on the NDCA 16-17 LD wiki within twenty four hours after reading the position. Disclosure means posting all tags, citations, and at least the first and last three words of each card under your own name, and a position is an affirmative case, DA, K or NC.

Tournament: Emory | Round: 2 | Opponent: Cypress Bay SD | Judge: Aurelia Williams
See open source.

Tournament: Longhorn Classic | Round: 1 | Opponent: Strake Jesuit JM | Judge: Kendra Blaney
See Open Source.

Tournament: Bid Round | Round: Quads | Opponent: You | Judge: Any
A. Interp: Debaters may read topicality as a reason to drop an affirmative argument or to vote down the affirmative debater only if they have disclosed the full text of the topicality interpretation at least fifteen minutes before the round on the 2016-2017 NDCA LD wiki.

Tournament: Any | Round: Quads | Opponent: You | Judge: Any
A. Interpretation: the affirmative may not defend a prohibition on uranium mining.

A. Interpretation: the affirmative should defend the desirability of topical action. To clarify, the aff must defend that countries prohibit the production of nuclear power via a postfiat policy.

A. Interpretation: the affirmative may not defend nuclear phase-out.

A. Interpretation: In order to be topical on the 2016 September-October NDCA Lincoln-Douglas topic, affirmative debaters may not specify a single country or group of countries that ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power; rather, they must defend the resolution as a general principle.

A. Interpretation: On the September-October 2016 LD resolution, affirmative debaters must only defend a prohibition on the production of energy produced by an atomic reaction capable of producing an alternative source of electrical power.

A. Interpretation: During the November-December 2016 LD topic, affirmative debaters may only defend that the United States Federal Government eliminate qualified immunity.
San Fellipo, 1992
131. The author understands "limit" as used in OR. ADMIN. R. 860-21-505(8) (1991) to mean cancel, as opposed to the word "curtail" used in section (7), meaning only a partial restriction.

A. Interpretation: In order to be topical on the 2016 September-October NDCA Lincoln-Douglas topic, affirmative debaters may not specify a subset of police officers that ought to limit qualified immunity.

Tournament: Emory | Round: 6 | Opponent: Stuyvesant PY | Judge: Rebecca Kuang
See open source.

Tournament: Tournament of Champions | Round: 3 | Opponent: Harvard Westlake EE | Judge: Sunhee Simon
See Open Source

Tournament: Apple Valley | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harrison MZ | Judge: Sheryl Kaczmarek
See Open Source.

Tournament: Blake | Round: Doubles | Opponent: WDM Valley EM | Judge: Jim Broomfield, Sam Anderson, Neha Pai
See Open Source.