Chaminade Jain Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard Westlake | 2 | dasd | asdas |
|
| ||
| Harvard Westlake | 4 | egljNN | NJKNJONVOinvjdnc |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
Sam Jain New NegTournament: Harvard Westlake | Round: 4 | Opponent: egljNN | Judge: NJKNJONVOinvjdnc NC-read yellow (unless there is only blue)Hate Crimes DARacist hate speech destroys the marketplace of ideas.Weberman, 2010 (Melissa ~Law Clerk in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. J.D. from Emory Law~ "University Hate Speech Policies and the Captive Audience Doctrine." Ohio Northern University Law Review 36 Ohio N.U.L. Rev. 553. 2010. Online. LexisNexis.) Hate speech connects with structures of oppression, harming the groups that it is directed towards.Weberman, 2010 (Melissa ~Law Clerk in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. J.D. from Emory Law~ "University Hate Speech Policies and the Captive Audience Doctrine." Ohio Northern University Law Review 36 Ohio N.U.L. Rev. 553. 2010. Online. LexisNexis.) Hate speech harms the individual, denying their right to education.Weberman, 2010 (Melissa ~Law Clerk in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. J.D. from Emory Law~ "University Hate Speech Policies and the Captive Audience Doctrine." Ohio Northern University Law Review 36 Ohio N.U.L. Rev. 553. 2010. Online. LexisNexis.) Hate speech denies targeted groups of the basic rights.Lee, 2001 (Orville ~Asst. Prof. of Sociology at the new School~. "Weapons for the Weak? Democratizing the Force of Words in an Uncivil Society." Law and Social Inquiry 26.4 (Autumn, 2001): 847-890. JSTOR.) cyberbullyingThe Constitution permits hate speechVolokh 15 ~Eugene; 5-7-2015; "No, there's no "hate speech" exception to the First Amendment"; https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/07/no-theres-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/~~ JC No anti-cyberbullying laws in the 1AC b/c they are restrictions on free speech – increases cyberbullyingHayward 13. John O. Hayward, ~Senior Lecturer in Law at Bentley Universityds~, "Anti-Cyberbullying Laws Are a Threat to Free Speech," Netiquette and Online Ethics, Gale: Opposing Viewpoints in Context, 2013, http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/DocumentToolsPortletWindow?displayGroupName=Viewpointsandjsid=86b8d9990680ac70437ab043a7b61192andaction=2andcatId=anddocumentId=GALE7CEJ3010868216andu=nysl_we_bcsdandzid=e5792b8229fbb3d88a51bec521a1e8cf//AD Anti-cyberbullying laws key to prevent cyberbullying – squo solves and checks off campus behaviorPatchin 10. Justin W. Patchin, ~Professor of Criminal Justice in the Department of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire~, 09/28/10, "Cyberbullying Laws and School Policy: A Blessing or Curse?," Cyberbullying Research Center, http://cyberbullying.org/cyberbullying-laws-and-school-policy-a-blessing-or-curse//AD Cyberbullying is conducive to abuse and kills self worth – impedes the ability to get education, turns caseETCB 16, End To Cyber Bullying, ~The End to Cyber Bullying (ETCB) Organization was founded in 2011 to raise global awareness on cyberbullying, and to mobilize youth, educators, parents, and others in taking efforts to end cyberbullying~, "A Surprising Long-Term Effect of Cyberbullying, ETCB Organization, 2016, http://www.endcyberbullying.org/a-surprising-long-term-effect-of-cyberbullying///AD CASEThe censorship applies ONLY to public colleges and Universities, not the USFG. The speech codes will vary from campus to campusSpeech restrictions are more effective than counterspeech at addressing bad speechVolokh 96 (Eugene, Acting Professor, UCLA Law School, 144 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2417, "FREEDOM OF SPEECH, PERMISSIBLE TAILORING AND TRANSCENDING STRICT SCRUTINY", lexis) Turn Chilling effect – informal policies lack the clarity of definitive speech codes.Juhan 12 S. Cagle Juhan (Judicial Law Clerk, Western District of Virginia; JD University of Virginia School of Law). "Free Speech, Hate Speech, and the Hostile Speech Environment." Virginia Law Review. November 2012 | 1/15/17 |
negTournament: Harvard Westlake | Round: 2 | Opponent: dasd | Judge: asdas NC-read yellow (unless there is only blue)Hate Crimes DAFirst, Hate Speech policies have historically been rejected as unconstitutional impositions on the free speech of students.Weberman, 2010 (Melissa ~Law Clerk in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. J.D. from Emory Law~ "University Hate Speech Policies and the Captive Audience Doctrine." Ohio Northern University Law Review 36 Ohio N.U.L. Rev. 553. 2010. Online. LexisNexis.) READ YELLOW Second, "Free Speech" is not racially neutral, and is part of a broader historical tradition that allows racism to continue virtually unchecked.Gillborn, 2009 (David ~Professor of Education at the University of London~ "Risk-Free Racism: Whiteness and So-Called 'Free Speech.'" Wake Forest Law Review 44 Wake Forest L. Rev. 535. Summer, 2009. LexisNexis Academic) ====Further, Defenses of Free Speech that don't engage with the tangible effects of speech are both overly idealistic, and continue to reify patriarchy and racism.==== Finally, Student directed resistance to the "free speech" of bigots isn't about censorship, it's about fighting inequality.Lafargue, 2016 (Ferentz ~Director of the Davis Center at Williams College~. "'Coddled' students and their 'safe spaces' aren't the problem, college official says. Bigots are." The Washington Post. 28 March 2016. Online. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2016/03/28/coddled-students-and-their-safe-spaces-arent-the-problem-college-official-says-bigots-are/**)** Racist hate speech destroys the marketplace of ideas.Weberman, 2010 (Melissa ~Law Clerk in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. J.D. from Emory Law~ "University Hate Speech Policies and the Captive Audience Doctrine." Ohio Northern University Law Review 36 Ohio N.U.L. Rev. 553. 2010. Online. LexisNexis.) Hate speech connects with structures of oppression, harming the groups that it is directed towards.Weberman, 2010 (Melissa ~Law Clerk in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. J.D. from Emory Law~ "University Hate Speech Policies and the Captive Audience Doctrine." Ohio Northern University Law Review 36 Ohio N.U.L. Rev. 553. 2010. Online. LexisNexis.) Hate speech harms the individual, denying their right to education.Weberman, 2010 (Melissa ~Law Clerk in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. J.D. from Emory Law~ "University Hate Speech Policies and the Captive Audience Doctrine." Ohio Northern University Law Review 36 Ohio N.U.L. Rev. 553. 2010. Online. LexisNexis.) Hate speech denies targeted groups of the basic rights.Lee, 2001 (Orville ~Asst. Prof. of Sociology at the new School~. "Weapons for the Weak? Democratizing the Force of Words in an Uncivil Society." Law and Social Inquiry 26.4 (Autumn, 2001): 847-890. JSTOR.) KThe AFF's assumption of a property right to free speech assumes an overly idealistic notion of society that ignores economic barriers and is a product of the neoliberal myth that individuality should be protected at all costs.Tillett-Saks 13 Andrew Tillett-Saks (Labor organizer and critical activist author for Truth-Out and Counterpunch), Neoliberal Myths, Counterpunch, 11/7/13, http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/11/07/neoliberal-myths/ LADI We have reached a tipping point – neoliberalism is no longer able to control its spiral into disaster. Massive structural violence and extinction are inevitable without a fundamental rethinking of the current system.Farbod 15 ( Faramarz Farbod , PhD Candidate @ Rutgers, Prof @ Moravian College, Monthly Review, http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2015/farbod020615.html, 6-2) LADI The claim that free speech leads to democratic debate and social progress is a neoliberal myth – the AFF's faith in the free exchange of ideas displaces a focus on direct action and re-entrenches multiple forms of oppression. Instead, the alternative is to reject the AFF's neoliberal framing of speech and direct pedagogy to focus on direct action against oppression.Tillett-Saks 13 Andrew Tillett-Saks (Labor organizer and critical activist author for Truth-Out and Counterpunch), Neoliberal Myths, Counterpunch, 11/7/13, http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/11/07/neoliberal-myths/ LADI A radical pedagogical stance is key – anti-capitalist movements can be effective, but critical consciousness is a necessary prerequisite.Peter Mclaren 4, Education and Urban Schooling Division prof, UCLA—and Valerie Scatamburlo-D'Annibale; University of Windsor, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2004, www.freireproject.org/articles/node2065/RCGS/class_dismissed-val-peter.10.pdf. LADI | 1/15/17 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|