Brentwood Richman Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley | 2 | Harvard-Westlake JI | Rory Jacobson |
|
| ||
| Damus | 2 | Harker AV | Adam Bistagne |
|
| ||
| Damus | 2 | Harker AV | Adam Bistagne |
|
| ||
| Damus | 2 | Harker AV | Adam Bistagne |
|
| ||
| Damus | 3 | Harvard-Westlake JN | Panny Shan |
|
| ||
| Damus | 3 | Harvard-Westlake JN | Panny Shan |
|
| ||
| Golden Desert | 2 | Palo Alto CF | Ashan Peiris |
|
| ||
| Golden Desert | 2 | Palo Alto CF | Ashan Peiris |
|
| ||
| Golden Desert | 3 | BASIS Silicon Valley EK | Travis Fife |
|
| ||
| Golden Desert | 3 | BASIS Silicon Valley EK | Travis Fife |
|
| ||
| Loyola | 2 | Harvard-Westlake JN | Joseph Barquin |
|
| ||
| Loyola | 1 | x | x |
|
| ||
| Loyola | 6 | San Marino KWu | Kris Kaya |
|
| ||
| Meadows | 5 | Marlborough GK | John Scoggin |
|
| ||
| UPS | 3 | Raisbeck Aviation ER | Eliza Haas |
|
| ||
| UPS | 3 | Raisbeck Aviation ER | Eliza Haas |
|
| ||
| UPS | 1 | Interlake HS - Bellevue MW | Jeffrey Richards |
|
| ||
| UPS | 1 | Interlake HS - Bellevue MW | Jeffrey Richards |
|
| ||
| UPS | 1 | Interlake HS - Bellevue MW | Jeffrey Richards |
|
| ||
| VBT | 1 | Harker SPy | Michael OKrent |
|
| ||
| VBT | 1 | Harker SPy | Michael OKrent |
|
| ||
| Voices | 1 | Lynbrook CW | John Overing |
|
| ||
| x | 1 | x | x |
|
| ||
| x | 1 | x | x |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0 - Contact InfoTournament: x | Round: 1 | Opponent: x | Judge: x | 11/6/16 |
1 - Interp Cannot disclose only open sourceTournament: x | Round: 1 | Opponent: x | Judge: x | 11/6/16 |
1 - Interp Competing ROBTournament: VBT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harker SPy | Judge: Michael OKrent | 1/14/17 |
1 - Interp Must ask about c-r-i-pTournament: Golden Desert | Round: 2 | Opponent: Palo Alto CF | Judge: Ashan Peiris | 2/4/17 |
1 - Interp Must defend implementationTournament: UPS | Round: 3 | Opponent: Raisbeck Aviation ER | Judge: Eliza Haas | 1/7/17 |
2 - Framework TTournament: Golden Desert | Round: 3 | Opponent: BASIS Silicon Valley EK | Judge: Travis Fife Interpretation - the aff must defend and can only garner offense from the desirability of the hypothetical enactment of a topical policy enacted by the resolution’s actors. ‘Resolved’ denotes a proposal to be enacted by law. Violation – confirmed in cx – you don’t defend the resolution Net Benefits: Limits Empiricism is on our side Critical thinking Anderson 6: Amanda Anderson 6, prof of English at Johns Hopkins The Way We Argue Now, 25-8 Topical fairness requirements are key to effective dialogue—monopolizing strategy and prep makes the discussion one-sided and subverts any meaningful neg role – that link turns the aff | 2/5/17 |
JANFEB - Communist Hypothesis KTournament: Golden Desert | Round: 3 | Opponent: BASIS Silicon Valley EK | Judge: Travis Fife Late modern society is self-reflexive – our identities are determined by the capitalism – what to buy, who to vote for, what brands are most socially responsible, what energy companies are least polluting – the modern ideal of the autonomous subject is no longer possible vis a vis the market system. Confronted with this crisis, the modern subject seeks to reconfirm and reconstitute an oppositional identity through the simulation of alternatives to the system – these performances of radical change pacify true dissent and enable the continued management of unsustainability – the impact is environmental destruction, extreme inequality and violent conflict. The 1ac’s use of hybridity and marginality as subversive cultural praxis fails – enables complicity with capitalism and dehistoricizes material, economic determinants of oppression. The alternative is to stop and think communism -- reject capitalistic identity separations and replace them with Communism– breaking free from the political closure of the status quo requires refusing the call to radical action in favor of developing a new, comprehensive understanding of the institutional constraints of the status quo. | 2/5/17 |
JANFEB - Hate Speech DATournament: UPS | Round: 1 | Opponent: Interlake HS - Bellevue MW | Judge: Jeffrey Richards Removing restrictions on free speech allows hate speech – hate speech IS free speech Hate speech leads to a genocidal increase in crimes against marginalized groups. Racial insults entrench white domination through degrading subjects and positioning the state as a protector of racism. The aff’s trivialization of hate speech undermines our project against systemic racism and oppression as a whole. EVEN if you grant them their silencing impacts – that silencing is KEY to create a cultural shift. Hates speech causes physical harm to its recipients. o/w any of aff’s “marketplace” impacts It’s try or die for speech restrictions – leaving racism unaddressed will only make things worse, a proactive approach is key to solve. Hate speech chills campus behavior – this turns AC impacts. | 2/5/17 |
JANFEB - Hate Speech PICTournament: UPS | Round: 1 | Opponent: Interlake HS - Bellevue MW | Judge: Jeffrey Richards Charles R. Lawrence III, “Crossburning and the Sound of Silence: Antisubordination Theory and the First Amendment,” 1992 Hate speech poses a direct threat to the oppressed. Banning it is necessary to promote inclusiveness. Courts check—things like context solves for crowding out speech that’s productive to solve structural violence. | 2/5/17 |
JANFEB - Hate Speech PICTournament: UPS | Round: 1 | Opponent: Interlake HS - Bellevue MW | Judge: Jeffrey Richards Charles R. Lawrence III, “Crossburning and the Sound of Silence: Antisubordination Theory and the First Amendment,” 1992 Hate speech poses a direct threat to the oppressed. Banning it is necessary to promote inclusiveness. Courts check—things like context solves for crowding out speech that’s productive to solve structural violence. | 2/5/17 |
JANFEB - Ideal Theory KTournament: VBT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harker SPy | Judge: Michael OKrent There is no outside of identity; the idea of a universal and transcendental psyche/reason is illusory. Their paradigms seek to exclude Black experience and erase the reality of Black sub-personhood. The notion of equality is a fantasy that seduces Black and Brown bodies to reject their reality, destroying their own existence—this notion of equality is a form assimilation by whites, which obscures anti-Black violence and racism. The alternative is an anti-ethical paradigm - this situates normativity on a focus towards material lived experiences - vote neg to reject the colorblind mindset of the 1AC that only re-entrenches domination. DO NOT SEPARATE THEIR ETHIC FROM ITS HITSORY—ETHICS SHOULD BE BASED IN EMPIRICAL REALITY AS OPPOSED TO ABSTRACT IDEALS. The affs approach to answering the question of “ought” presumes access that the black thinker does not have – The world is framed by white supremacy, and black ethical deliberation is censored in favor of abstract white philosophy. The perm is a form of footnoting that ignores the consequences against communities of color – when we strive for equality, it’s never been inclusive of black folk ROB: Critically analyze the 1AC’s framing prior to the consequences of the plan They result in misinterpretation of the world and distort communication—the 1AC is rooted in an epistemology of ignorance—critique is a prior question. | 1/14/17 |
JANFEB - Methods KTournament: Golden Desert | Round: 2 | Opponent: Palo Alto CF | Judge: Ashan Peiris B. Dictionary.com defines free speech as Part 2: Impact b) Research Burdens Two implications c)Critical thinking d) Defending the topic is hard because it requires you to admit you could be wrong—that generates competitive respect and dialogue. Voting aff reinforces group polarization and choir preaching. Part 3: Alt – Reject the affirmative advocacy for being non-topical. | 2/4/17 |
JANFEB - Revenge Porn PICTournament: Berkeley | Round: 2 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake JI | Judge: Rory Jacobson “Public colleges and universities in the United States ought to expand the view of sexual violence violations to include revenge pornography as harassment and restrict it accordingly.” Rennison and Addington 14 is the solvency advocate: The counterplan competes through mutual exclusivity; the aff defends all constitutionally protected speech and revenge pornography is federally protected under the first amendment. Because the anti-revenge-porn … and historical images.” Revenge Pornography is inherently sexist – there is no debate. Filipovic 13: Don’t let them say free speech good; discursive objectification of women on college campuses takes away their speech. Turns case. Pinar 12: Women speech on sexual violence is silenced through a false dualism of private and public spheres. A safe internet is a radical counter public where the violence faced by women can be heard and responded to – leads to larger societal spillover. Salter 13: | 2/18/17 |
JANFEB - Victim Blaming KTournament: UPS | Round: 3 | Opponent: Raisbeck Aviation ER | Judge: Eliza Haas The 1ACs intellectualization of free speech to problematize the activism of students ignores the real struggles people of color and other minorities face every day. By immediately criticizing marginalized people for their tactics, you give an easy out to discard discussion of the issues they face. Their complaints of a “liberal bubble” show the real hypocrisy of “progressive writers”, the only time you care about suppression of speech and ignorance of viewpoints is when minorities are protecting themselves from hateful speech, but ignore ongoing suppression of minority speech by the dominant class. Don’t let them go for solvency when the only people they protect are the powerful. Welcome to Victim Blaming 2.0TM, with included self righteousness and claims of moral superiority! The aff’s invocation of free speech is the new trick to avoid ever discussing concrete material claims of racism. The alternative is to end the diversion embodied by the 1AC and confront issues of racism and oppression head on instead of abstracting to higher principles like free speech. Free speech good is non-responsive and just links harder into the K, even if free speech is good, your tactics of using it to deflect real world harms is bad. Claims of “free speech” are just a right wing power grab – speech has never been free but that doesn’t stop dominant power structures from using it to protect repugnant viewpoints while censoring others at the same time | 1/7/17 |
NOVDEC - Court Clog DATournament: Damus | Round: 2 | Opponent: Harker AV | Judge: Adam Bistagne Immunity for government officials is necessary to screen out frivolous litigations Court clog from new litigation independently destroys the economy. An economic collapse causes a global nuclear war. | 11/6/16 |
NOVDEC - Crime DATournament: Damus | Round: 2 | Opponent: Harker AV | Judge: Adam Bistagne Crime is at an all time law, and has been steadily falling. Threat of litigation causes paralyzed police action. Threat of litigation is high and harms police morale. Litigation prevents police from upholding the law. Studies show police perceive litigation as hindering job performance Wills and Quail ’06 John Wills,Jeff Quail; “The Emerging Trend of Criminal Complacency;” Officer.com; November 6, 2006 Crime inherently causes poverty- multiple levels to solve for. Poverty is the deadliest form of structural violence – it is equivalent to an ongoing nuclear war. | 11/6/16 |
NOVDEC - Disarm the Police CPTournament: Damus | Round: 3 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake JN | Judge: Panny Shan Counterplan text: The United States ought to disarm the police. Solves the aff Berlatsky 16: Noah Berlatsky “The case for disarming America’s police force” January 27, 2016. Spills over to all other aspects of police force – guns enable a policing philosophy built on violence. | 11/6/16 |
NOVDEC - Laundry List CPTournament: Damus | Round: 2 | Opponent: Harker AV | Judge: Adam Bistagne Lawson and Henderson 07 Karen McGill Lawson, President and CEO, LCCREF and Wade Henderson, Counselor, LCCREF; A report from the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights Education Fund, September 2007. “Prosecute Police Misconduct and Hate Crimes” | 11/6/16 |
NOVDEC - Legal Realism KTournament: Damus | Round: 3 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake JN | Judge: Panny Shan The rule of law is a myth. The law is not neutral but inherently political; the AC’s acceptance of the rule of law makes them complicit in the state’s oppression. Objectivity within the law is impossible; the idea that we can ever reach a sound conclusion based on the law alone is wishful thinking Consensus of legal opinion doesn’t prove objectivity but instead shows how conservative and ideologically narrow the typical judge is; accepting the “stability” of the rule of law makes radical change impossible The state wants you to believe in the so-called “rule of law” so that it can ensure its authority is unquestioned—this props up an oppressive power structure where state violence is conducted in the name of “impartial application of the law” Even if we could have some definitive, consistent body of rules that are impartially applied, why should we? The alt is to embracing law’s indeterminacy—it’s the only way to ensure justice and fairness. Ignoring the rule of law’s violent underside fuels Western imperialism and the violence that comes with it Underview | 11/6/16 |
SEPOCT - Coal DATournament: Loyola | Round: 2 | Opponent: Harvard-Westlake JN | Judge: Joseph Barquin | 10/9/16 |
SEPOCT - Must defend all usesTournament: Meadows | Round: 5 | Opponent: Marlborough GK | Judge: John Scoggin
| 10/30/16 |
SEPOCT - Price Shocks DATournament: Voices | Round: 1 | Opponent: Lynbrook CW | Judge: John Overing The plan causes oil prices to spike Increased electricity prices collapses the steel industry Buyer 7 (Steve, Before the International Trade Commission, Member of the House of Representatives, Regarding the five-year sunset review on Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Argentina, China, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Netherlands, Romania, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and Ukraine, 7-31-7, (Inv. Nos. 701-TA-404-408 and 731-TA-898-908) | 10/9/16 |
SEPOCT - Space DATournament: Loyola | Round: 1 | Opponent: x | Judge: x B. Link - Nuclear propulsion technology is key to space exploration. Bromley ("Nuclear Propulsion: Getting More Miles Per Gallon" Blair Bromley, 2000 Canadian Nuclear Laboratories, Deep River Engineering Physics, Mechanical Engineering, Nuclear Engineering Doctor of Philosophy, Nuclear Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 9.55) C. Impact - One hundred trillion humans are lost every second of delayed colonization Bostrom (Bostrom, Professor of Philosophy at Yale and Oxford, 2K4 (Nick, “Astronomical Waste: The Opportunity Cost of Delayed Technological Development,”) | 10/9/16 |
SEPTOCT - Pre-FiatTournament: Loyola | Round: 6 | Opponent: San Marino KWu | Judge: Kris Kaya | 10/9/16 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|---|---|---|
10/9/16 | lrichman2019@bwscampuscom |
|