| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damus | 2 | Oakwood |
|
| |||
| Glenbrooks | 1 | Bailey Dettmer | Chetan Hertzig |
|
| ||
| Voices | 2 | Alycia Cary | Scott Phillips |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
NovDec QI AbleismTournament: Glenbrooks | Round: 1 | Opponent: Bailey Dettmer | Judge: Chetan Hertzig Hurley ‘15 Lawrence Hurley, “The Supreme Court Just Sided With 2 San Francisco Cops Who Shot A Mentally Ill Woman Wielding A Knife” Reuters. 5/18/15. http://www.businessinsider.com/r-us-top-court-backs-police-over-arrest-of-mentally-ill-woman-2015-5 The U.S. Supreme...go to trial. In discussions of police brutality, disabled folks are shoved into the corner and unmentioned. Excessive force, mistreatment and malice are everyday occurrences in the lives of those who are differently abled. These are not isolated incidents – empirically people with disabilities are much more likely to face arrest, discrimination, and police brutality. Qualified immunity makes disabled folks open to over policing and brutality – Officers get away without facing the disastrous consequences of their actions. Qualified immunity prevents victims from accessing compensation for discrimination cases. Plan Thus the plan text: The United States federal government ought to mandate that all circuit courts prohibit the use of the qualified immunity defense for damages brought under the Rehabilitation Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Individuals with Disabilities Act against police officers. Allowing plaintiffs to pursue legal remedy through disability legislation has empirically caused increased accommodations and facilities for disabled folks. Police departments can change and improve interaction with mentally ill – Memphis proves. ROB/Framing The role of the ballot is to promote strategies for the liberation of disabled people. Exclusion of disabled individuals is the root cause of violence. The relationship between the police and disabled folks has reached a breaking point – an intense examination of the structures that separate them is required for positive change Underview
Solutions to oppression need to be grounded in policy rather than abstraction. K’s must be tied to an implementable, political solution to be effective. Policymaking is key to political activism, which turns the k. 2. Theory
| 12/17/16 |
SepOct Nuclear energy DemocracyTournament: Voices | Round: 2 | Opponent: Alycia Cary | Judge: Scott Phillips Jean Jacques Rousseau “THE SOCIAL CONTRACT OR PRINCIPLES OF POLITICAL RIGHT” 1762. Translated by G. D. H. Cole The general will must be achieved through democratic deliberation under free and equal conditions. Seyla Benhabib 94 Eugene Mayer Professor of Political Science and Philosophy at Yale University, and director of the program in Ethics, Politics, and Economics, and a well-known contemporary philosopher, “Deliberative Rationality and Models of Democratic Legitimacy”, Constellations Volume I, No/, 1994, Published by Blackwell Publishers, BE . Deliberative democracy is epistemically more reliable since it accounts for a plurality of opinions. Christiano, Tom, "Democracy", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/democracy/. Oppression - Democracy is a key motivating factor and methodology for resisting oppression. Glasius, Marlies, and Geoffrey Pleyers. "The global moment of 2011: Democracy, social justice and dignity." Development and Change 44.3 (2013): 547-567. JL Democracy is key for social struggle – black lives matter proves Bradley, S. M. "The Rise of #blacklivesmatter." Amderican Book Review 37.3 (2016): 5-5. Project MUSE. Web. 9 Sep. 2016. https://muse.jhu.edu/. JL Moral progress - Democracy allows for self-correction and only alternative is totalitarianism. Amartya Sen, "WHY DEMOCRATIZATION IS NOT THE SAME AS WESTERNIZATION. Democracy and Its Global Roots", The New Republic Online Post date: 09.25.03 Issue date: 10.06.03 Contention 1 is deliberation Nuclear energy consistently fails to engage in effective public deliberation – India’s example provides three warrants. Bhadra, Monamie. "Fighting Nuclear Energy, Fighting for India's Democracy." Science as Culture 22.2 (2013): 238-246. Public trust in the nuclear industry is near rock bottom - any attempt to reconcile inevitably fails and leaves the population unequipped to evaluate nuclear programs. M.V. Ramana (2011) Nuclear power and the public, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 67:4, 43-51, DOI: 10.1177/0096340211413358, JL Nuclear power is subject to severe stigma and causes widespread exclusion that inhibits the ability of citizens to participate. M.V. Ramana (2011) Nuclear power and the public, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 67:4, 43-51, DOI: 10.1177/0096340211413358, JL The public is excluded and kept in the dark for decision-making processes regarding nuclear energy. Dean Kyne Department of Sociology and Anthropology, the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley and Bob Bolin School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University “Emerging Environmental Justice Issues in Nuclear Power and Radioactive Contamination” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 700; doi:10.3390/ijerph13070700 RY Secrecy kills deliberative democracy since it excludes constituents from knowing about or participating in the decision making process. Lee H. Hamilton former member of the United States House of Representatives and currently a member of the U.S. Homeland Security Advisory Council “COLUMN: Government secrecy is killing our democracy behind closed doors” Mar 30, 2016. RY Contention 3 is corruption and corporate power Richard Tanter, "After Fukushima: A Survey of Corruption in the Global Nuclear Power Industry", Asian Perspective 37 (2013), 475–500, JL Richard Tanter, "After Fukushima: A Survey of Corruption in the Global Nuclear Power Industry", Asian Perspective 37 (2013), 475–500, JL Big nuclear has caused regulatory capture and manipulates policy makers to serve their interests – we need to stand against the trend before its too late. | 12/17/16 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|