Apple Valley Boals Neg
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Finals | Anyone | Judy |
|
| ||
| All | Finals | Anyone | Judy |
|
| ||
| Blake | 2 | Valley CR | Trevor Martinez |
|
| ||
| Emory | 1 | Vestavia | Alston |
|
| ||
| Emory | 4 | Harvard Westlake CE | Nails |
|
|
| |
| Greenhill | 1 | St Thomas Academy NW | OKrent |
|
| ||
| Greenhill | 3 | Newark Science BA | Chris Vincent |
|
| ||
| Greenhill | 6 | Interlake RM | Megan Nubel |
|
| ||
| Marx | 4 | Winston Churchill | Idk |
|
| ||
| Marx | Doubles | idk | panel |
|
| ||
| Minneapple RR | 1 | Cambridge Rindge and Latin OS | Panel |
|
| ||
| Valley | 4 | LHP SG | DC Cunningham |
|
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Emory | 4 | Opponent: Harvard Westlake CE | Judge: Nails Read queer pess and T collapsed to T in the 2N |
| Valley | 4 | Opponent: LHP SG | Judge: DC Cunningham 1AC-Frames of war |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
0-Blindness KTournament: Greenhill | Round: 6 | Opponent: Interlake RM | Judge: Megan Nubel The term "blindness" used synonomously with ignorance ingrains the oppression of the blind, implying those with no sight are less than.James 2k ~Rachel, 8-19-09 Deeply Problematic, "'Blinded by privileged': ableist language in critical discourse"~ The alternative is a loss for the aff-hold them accountable for their discourse. That's key to inclusivity which comes first because a) it's a framing issue for who gets the benefits of debate and b) it's key to make sure we can walk the talk of standing up to oppression.Vote on the speech act before the flow-you are an adult and an educator far before you are a Judge.Vincent 13 ~Chris. "Re-Conceptualizing Our Performances: Accountability in Lincoln Douglas Debate." Victory Briefs. N.p., 23 Oct. 2013. Web.~ The role of the ballot is to vote for the best liberation method for the oppressed. The role of the judge is to perform the role of a critical educator focused on making debate as inclusive as possible. | 9/18/16 |
0-Critical Pedagogy KTournament: Greenhill | Round: 3 | Opponent: Newark Science BA | Judge: Chris Vincent Critical pedagogy overlooks the ways in which disability locks the classroom door. Their assumptions about who can be taught in what way reflect a social conception of who should be taught echoed within the field of critical pedagogy.Gabel 02 ~Susan (US Rehabilitation Services Administration Institute on Rehabilitation Issues Scholar) "Some conceptual problems with critical pedagogy." Curriculum Inquiry 32.2 (2002): 177-201.~ And the liberational pedagogy you advocate is based in the creation of a normative "voice" which is assumed to be normatively expressed. This erases differently abled student's abilities to engage within your pedagogy.Gabel 02 ~Susan (US Rehabilitation Services Administration Institute on Rehabilitation Issues Scholar) "Some conceptual problems with critical pedagogy." Curriculum Inquiry 32.2 (2002): 177-201.~ The impact is the demonization of the differently abled-this locks these students into their current position and undermines your goal of a cohesive movement for the liberation of all groups.Gabel 02 ~Susan (US Rehabilitation Services Administration Institute on Rehabilitation Issues Scholar) "Some conceptual problems with critical pedagogy." Curriculum Inquiry 32.2 (2002): 177-201.~ The alternative is to embrace sick woman theory- We must redraw the classroom lines insofar as we erase them completely. Our alternative is an embrace of the student who is not allowed into the classroom-the protestor left unable to join the march.Hedva 16 ~Johanna. "Sick Woman Theory." Mask Magazine. N.p., Jan. 2016. Web. 27 Jan. 2016.~ Our criticism is key-only by exposing the flaws within their pedagogy can change occur.Gabel 02 ~Susan (US Rehabilitation Services Administration Institute on Rehabilitation Issues Scholar) "Some conceptual problems with critical pedagogy." Curriculum Inquiry 32.2 (2002): 177-201.~ | 9/17/16 |
0-Disclose or LoseTournament: All | Round: Finals | Opponent: Anyone | Judge: Judy | 9/8/16 |
0-Plan FlawTournament: Greenhill | Round: 6 | Opponent: Interlake RM | Judge: Megan Nubel There isn't a period at the end of the plan text which means that it's not a sentence, just a phrase which would imply that the plan is a suggestion rather than a legal mandate. | 9/18/16 |
GENERAL INFO AND CONTACTTournament: All | Round: Finals | Opponent: Anyone | Judge: Judy If you're frantically trying to contact me at a tournament about something on my wiki please shoot me a text otherwise, email or facebook is probably the best way to contact me. I firmly believe in making debate as accessible as possible and as such I will try to give a trigger warning before each round but if there is anything on my wiki that you don't feel safe debating please let me know. If you are trying to re-cut something from my wiki but don't have access to a source let me know and ill send you the pdf. | 9/8/16 |
JanFeb-Straight People Aint Never Listen EitherTournament: Emory | Round: 1 | Opponent: Vestavia | Judge: Alston The flesh speaks in queer tongues regardless of our social location. The structure of neoliberal exclusion is based around what voices are listened to and the violence done through the demarcation of bodies itself can only be represented through sounds like screams. Ours is a method of inhabiting the absence of sound in an attempt to tune into the unheard. They don't get to weigh case-it doesn't matter what we say if nobody ever listens.James 14 ~~~Robin James. November 26, 2014. NOTES ON WEHELIYE'S HABEAS VISCUS: OR WHY SOME POSTHUMANISMS ARE BETTER THAN OTHERS. It's Her Factory. http://www.its-her-factory.com/2014/11/notes-on-weheliyes-habeas-viscus-or-why-some-posthumanisms-are-better-than-others/~~~~~~ | 1/27/17 |
JanFeb-Straight People Always be Running Their MouthsTournament: Blake | Round: 2 | Opponent: Valley CR | Judge: Trevor Martinez FROM THIS POINT ON:Schamel 15 ~Craig. "The Liberal As An Enemy Of Queer Justice." Catalyst: A Social Justice Forum. Vol. 6. No. 1. 2015.~ First, Violence against the queer is an ontological condition of possibility for American liberal democracy: straight society grounds itself through the bashing of the queer, driven by a heterosexual economy of desire that extracts pleasure from the suffering of the queer body.Stanley 2011 (Eric, Sad Gay "Near Life, Queer Death Overkill and Ontological Capture," Social Text 107 s Vol. 29, No. 2 s Summer 2011) AVJB Second, The promulgation of free speech as a right and an avenue for justice is inaccessible to queer people. Free speech is a façade of equality, co-opted by heteronormativity to foster debate not for us but about us.Schamel 15 ~Craig. "The Liberal As An Enemy Of Queer Justice." Catalyst: A Social Justice Forum. Vol. 6. No. 1. 2015.~ And, The idea of liberatory speech is a distractionary tactic that forces queer people to buy back into the system, because if we try hard enough, and fight for long enough, we can totally win back their hearts and minds!Schamel 15 ~Craig. "The Liberal As An Enemy Of Queer Justice." Catalyst: A Social Justice Forum. Vol. 6. No. 1. 2015.~ And, The idea of liberation through conversation in an academic space is heterosexed nonsense that trades off with revolutionary strategies.Schamel 15 ~Craig. "The Liberal As An Enemy Of Queer Justice." Catalyst: A Social Justice Forum. Vol. 6. No. 1. 2015.~ This is the kind of shit that causes overkill. Overkill is ontologically different from other types of violence-it's more than an attempt to do violence unto a body, it's an attempt to do violence unto all queer bodies. Don't let them weigh case-Their impact calculus will never understand what it means to do violence to that which is nothing.Stanley 3 (Eric, Sad Gay "Near Life, Queer Death Overkill and Ontological Capture," Social Text 107 s Vol. 29, No. 2 s Summer 2011) AVJB Our alternative is Queer Nihilism-A continuous struggle of negativity against every possible form of civil society. Ours is a recognition that there is no space for the queer within the symbolic order and never will be and that the only life worth living is one of inevitable struggle in which we ascribe ourselves to the death drive. There is no perm-we are an embrace of the inherent destruction of society, the 1AC embraces it in some form.Baedan 12 ~"Baedan." The Anarchist Library. N.p., Summer 2012. Web. 02 Nov. 2016.~ | 1/3/17 |
JanFeb-T-AnyTournament: Emory | Round: 4 | Opponent: Harvard Westlake CE | Judge: Nails Interp: Aff must defend that public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech.Merriam-Webster's defines "any": Dictionary.com Continueshttp://www.dictionary.com/browse/any StandardsCommon usageGeneric Plans Good doesn’t applyAnd, Topicality interpretations must be justified by the semantic plausibility as well as the pragmatic benefits that arise from that interpretation- this means you reject interpretations that lack a metric to assess the truth-validity/accuracy of their topical definition. Nebel 15Nebel, Jake. "2 The Parametric Conception of Topicality." The Priority of Resolutional Semantics. Victory Briefs, 20 Feb. 2015. Web. 19 Apr. 2015. PH Fairness is a voting issueDrop the debater on TNo RVI on topicality | 1/28/17 |
NovDec-Queer NihilismTournament: Minneapple RR | Round: 1 | Opponent: Cambridge Rindge and Latin OS | Judge: Panel Violence against the queer is an ontological condition of possibility for American liberal democracy: straight society grounds itself through the bashing of the queer, driven by a heterosexual economy of desire that extracts pleasure from the suffering of the queer body.Stanley 2011 (Eric, Sad Gay "Near Life, Queer Death Overkill and Ontological Capture," Social Text 107 s Vol. 29, No. 2 s Summer 2011) AVJB We'll isolate two specific links from the 1AC:First, the 1AC represents violence against the other as an instance of personal responsibility rather than an overarching epistemic system grounded in the destruction of queerness. This privatization of queerness works to make the general situational and obscures the interworkings of state-legitimized antiqueer violence.Stanley 2 (Eric, Sad Gay "Near Life, Queer Death Overkill and Ontological Capture," Social Text 107 s Vol. 29, No. 2 s Summer 2011) AVJB Second, The 1AC is just another attempt at getting queer people to buy into the possibility of legal liberation. Be skeptical of their liberation claims-they don't actually give us liberation, only bring us a few steps closer to the inevitable slamming shut of the courthouse gates.Infanti 06 ~Anthony C. "Homo sacer, homosexual: Some thoughts on waging tax guerrilla warfare." Unbound: Harvard Journal of the Legal Left 2.7 (2006).~ This is the kind of shit that causes overkill. Overkill is ontologically different from other types of violence-it's more than an attempt to do violence unto a body, it's an attempt to do violence unto all queer bodies. Don't let them weigh case-Their impact calculus will never understand what it means to do violence to that which is nothing.Stanley 3 (Eric, Sad Gay "Near Life, Queer Death Overkill and Ontological Capture," Social Text 107 s Vol. 29, No. 2 s Summer 2011) AVJB Our alternative is Queer Nihilism-A continuous struggle of negativity against every possible form of civil society. Ours is a recognition that there is no space for the queer within the symbolic order and never will be and that the only life worth living is one of inevitable struggle in which we ascribe ourselves to the death drive. There is no perm-we are an embrace of the inherent destruction of society, the 1AC embraces it in some form.Baedan 12 ~"Baedan." The Anarchist Library. N.p., Summer 2012. Web. 02 Nov. 2016.~ The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater that provides the best liberation method for the oppressed. The role of the judge is to be an educator concerned with a queer pedagogy.Romo et al 13 ~Hernández, Ma del Refugio Navarro, Prisca Icela Romo González, and Salvador Vázquez Sánchez. "Gender and constructs from the hidden curriculum." Creative Education 4.12 (2013): 89.~ | 11/6/16 |
SeptOct-Anti-QueernessTournament: Greenhill | Round: 1 | Opponent: St Thomas Academy NW | Judge: OKrent 1NC-Generic====Subpoint A is the Link:==== ====The affirmative discourse concerning nuclear power generation constitutes an act of violence against queer bodies. Specifically, discourses about nuclear waste replicate discourses of purity and impurity that help determine what bodies matter in our consideration of policy. The repetition of this discursive practice makes some bodies and environments matter and some not. Any discourse surrounding environmental and nuclear policy necessarily implies that non-procreative bodies are the same as social waste.==== And nuclear rhetoric extends beyond queer bodies being wasteful, but instead extends to radiation itself. Radiation and queerness are rhetorically intertwined to imply that queer bodies themselves are poisonous and must be publically identified, disciplined, and rejected out of hand.Bryan-Wilson 15 ~Julia. "Aftermath: Two Queer Artists Respond to Nuclear Spaces." Critical Landscapes: Art, Space, Politics. N.p.: Univ of California, 2015. 77-92. Print.~ AVJB Subpoint B is the Impact:The discourse surrounding queer bodies as toxic, irrelevant, and nuclear does creates a structural form of violence that rejects their identities entirely – that they ought not have existed to begin with. For queer bodies, this is means they are subjected to overkill. Call the next evidence specifically – the heteronormative language that generates gay panic and spread is what allows overkill as a form of violence to thrive. Also note that overkill is ontologically different from other types of violence-it's more than an attempt to do violence unto a body, it's an attempt to do violence unto all queer bodies. Don't let them weigh case-Their impact calculus will never understand what it means to do violence to that which is nothing. If queer lives matter, the recognition of this impact first is paramount. Only recognizing this form of violence is sufficient to begin addressing the problem of non-heteronormative bodies.Stanley 2011 (Eric, "Near Life, Queer Death Overkill and Ontological Capture," Social Text 107 s Vol. 29, No. 2 s Summer 2011) AVJB The Impact is Nihilism-fear of the nuclearized other results in a society of skepticism that kills connections between people and fosters omnicidal desire. This fear of the other reduces human desire to simply the desire of a machine.Foertsch 01 ~Jacqueline. (Dr. Foertsch specializes in the areas of post-WWII American literature, culture, and film and is the author of four books and numerous articles on these and related subjects. PhD in English) Enemies within: The cold war and the AIDS crisis in literature, film, and culture. University of Illinois Press, 2001.~ Subpoint C is the Alternative:Our alternative is to embrace all that is nuclear as an act of radical queer anti-futurism.Bryan-Wilson 15 ~Julia. "Aftermath: Two Queer Artists Respond to Nuclear Spaces." Critical Landscapes: Art, Space, Politics. N.p.: Univ of California, 2015. 77-92. Print.~ AVJB | 9/17/16 |
SeptOct-Anti-Queerness V2Tournament: Valley | Round: 4 | Opponent: LHP SG | Judge: DC Cunningham And nuclear rhetoric extends beyond queer bodies being wasteful, and extends to radiation itself. Radiation and queerness are rhetorically intertwined to imply that queer bodies themselves are poisonous and must be publically identified, disciplined, and rejected out of hand.Bryan-Wilson 15 ~Julia. "Aftermath: Two Queer Artists Respond to Nuclear Spaces." Critical Landscapes: Art, Space, Politics. N.p.: Univ of California, 2015. 77-92. Print.~ AVJB Specifically, the 1AC echoes traditional cold war policy of social stability and environmental pureness that culminates in a futuristic drive to heteronormative reproduction.Masco 04 ~Joseph. "Mutant Ecologies: Radioactive Life in Post–Cold War New Mexico." Cultural Anthropology 19.4 (2004): 517-550.~ ====Furthermore, their drive to preserve the natural is symbolic of a war waged against not only queer bodies but People of Color and Natives.==== This is the kind of shit that causes overkill. Overkill is ontologically different from other types of violence-it's more than an attempt to do violence unto a body, it's an attempt to do violence unto all queer bodies. Don't let them weigh case-Their impact calculus will never understand what it means to do violence to that which is nothing.Stanley 2011 (Eric, "Near Life, Queer Death Overkill and Ontological Capture," Social Text 107 s Vol. 29, No. 2 s Summer 2011) AVJB Our alternative is to embrace all that is nuclear as an act of radical queer anti-futurism.Bryan-Wilson 15 ~Julia. "Aftermath: Two Queer Artists Respond to Nuclear Spaces." Critical Landscapes: Art, Space, Politics. N.p.: Univ of California, 2015. 77-92. Print.~ AVJB Our alternative ruptures the divide between us/them and the desire to lash out against the other.Foertsch 01 ~Jacqueline. (Dr. Foertsch specializes in the areas of post-WWII American literature, culture, and film and is the author of four books and numerous articles on these and related subjects. PhD in English) Enemies within: The cold war and the AIDS crisis in literature, film, and culture. University of Illinois Press, 2001.~ And, Within the postmodern era the fear of the other has definitively shifted. Society no longer fears external threats because the us/them binary is so engrained rather oppression exists as a result of the fear of the enemy within. This means our impacts outweigh-we control solvency on the dominant frame of war.Foertsch 01 ~Jacqueline. (Dr. Foertsch specializes in the areas of post-WWII American literature, culture, and film and is the author of four books and numerous articles on these and related subjects. PhD in English) Enemies within: The cold war and the AIDS crisis in literature, film, and culture. University of Illinois Press, 2001.~ And, the 1AC's nuclear metaphors turn case. The metaphor of radiation blocks off criticism of western expansionism and forces politics of tunnel vision obscuring the ever-expanding war against the other outside our borders.Foertsch 01 ~Jacqueline. (Dr. Foertsch specializes in the areas of post-WWII American literature, culture, and film and is the author of four books and numerous articles on these and related subjects. PhD in English) Enemies within: The cold war and the AIDS crisis in literature, film, and culture. University of Illinois Press, 2001.~ | 9/24/16 |
SeptOct-Ban Nukes CPTournament: Marx | Round: Doubles | Opponent: idk | Judge: panel Counterplan text: Countries ought to ban nuclear weapons but keep nuclear weapons.Brehm et al 13, Maya Brehm, Richard Moyes and Thomas Nash, February 2013, "Banning Nuclear Weapons Article 36" | 10/16/16 |
SeptOct-BioD DATournament: Marx | Round: Doubles | Opponent: idk | Judge: panel Expert consensus and rigorous scientific studies overwhelmingly conclude that nuclear power is key to curb emissions and protect global biodiversityConnor 15 – (Jan 3, "Nuclear power is the greenest option, say top scientists" http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/nuclear-power-is-the-greenest-option-say-top-scientists-9955997.html) Biod loss causes extinction—-consensus of newest scientific evidenceTorres 16 – (Apr 11, Phil, is the founding director of the X-Risks Institute, a contributor for the Future of Life Institute, an affiliate scholar at the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, and the author of The End: What Science and Religion Tell Us About the Apocalypse. His writing focuses on apocalyptic terrorism, emerging technologies, and existential risks. "Biodiversity loss: An existential risk comparable to climate change" http://thebulletin.org/biodiversity-loss-existential-risk-comparable-climate-change9329) | 10/16/16 |
SeptOct-Extra TTournament: Greenhill | Round: 6 | Opponent: Interlake RM | Judge: Megan Nubel A interp: Debaters must defend that countries prohibit the production of nuclear power and may not defend an action that results in a topical action.C: Standards.PredictabilityCounter-Plan Ground.Fiat abuse-VotersFairness No RVI on topicality | 9/18/16 |
SeptOct-WarmingTournament: Greenhill | Round: 3 | Opponent: Newark Science BA | Judge: Chris Vincent A is the uniqueness: currently, nuclear power is currently the only feasible, non-carbon based energy production. Hansen 15:James Hansen (adjunct professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences at Columbia), Kerry Emanuel (professor of meteorology at MIT), Ken Caldeira and Tom Wigley. "Nuclear power paves the only viable path forward on climate change." The Guardian. December 3, 2015. JY. B is the linkEmpirical evidence shows that banning nuclear energy leads to an increase in fossil fuels for energy production. Impact is huge. McDonald 1McDonald, Michael. "Germany's Nuclear Cutback Is Darkening European Skies | OilPrice.com." OilPrice.com. OilPrice, 6 May 2015. Web. 28 Mar. 2016. And for Europe especially the only option is US coal. McDonald 2McDonald, Michael. "Germany's Nuclear Cutback Is Darkening European Skies | OilPrice.com." OilPrice.com. OilPrice, 6 May 2015. Web. 28 Mar. 2016. ====C is the impact: continued use of carbon-based fuels causes warming. Gertz:==== Warming disproportionately affects people of color, the global south, and women worldwide while they contribute least to emissions.Pellow 12 Reducing emissions disproportionately benefits people of color in the US.Jay and Boyce 12 ~Paul, and James Boyce. "20,000 People a Year Die From Effects of Fossil Fuel Generation." The Real News Network. N.p., 05 Dec. 2012. Web. 17 Sept. 2016.~ | 9/17/16 |
T-White PeopleTournament: Marx | Round: 4 | Opponent: Winston Churchill | Judge: Idk Interpretation – White people may only garner offense from hypothetical enactment of the resolution or a topical plan.Resolved reflects policy passage before a legislative body. Parcher 01 Merriam Webster defines "country"an area of land that is controlled by its own government "Prohibit" means legal enforcementDictionary.com http://www.dictionary.com/browse/prohibit B is the Violation: they don't defend a legal action and CX proves—if you prove the topic is bad that still doesn't disprove her advocacy.C: StandardsWhiteness is fluid-their refusal to defend the state is representative of the white people's legal fluidity during the beginnings of the colonial state-white people set laws for everyone and then broke them themselves in order to escape responsibility for their actions. Natives and the USFG made treaties and then the USFG broke them and refused to take responsibility.Next is switch side. Fluidity is the strategy of whiteness, able to mold and shape itself to avoid being identified and to remain invisible.Switch side debate is blackness – Conviction based debate is whiteness.Evans, 2012. Rashad. JD Penn. http://www.rwesq.com/the-3nr/ November 21 It's a voting issue - You fail to ground your discourse in materiality – you don't defend anything and understand the impacts of your inactionRashad Evans writes while debating Casey Harrigan in 2012: Rashad Evans, 2012 11-20-2012 (http://www.rwesq.com/the-1nc/) Also, T version of the aff solves-just defend the state, they don't get to cross apply their state bad arguments if they are white, its not relevant to them and allows them to avoid their own social location. | 10/15/16 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|