Anderson Thomason Aff
| Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Edit/Delete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grapevine | 1 | Burleson Centennial MS | Cavanaugh, Dylan |
|
|
| |
| yes | Finals | Yes | yes |
|
|
| |
| yup | Quads | sure |
|
|
| Tournament | Round | Report |
|---|---|---|
| Grapevine | 1 | Opponent: Burleson Centennial MS | Judge: Cavanaugh, Dylan yes |
| yes | Finals | Opponent: Yes | Judge: yes yes |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
| Entry | Date |
|---|---|
NovDec Dem ACTournament: yup | Round: Quads | Opponent: | Judge: sure 1ACFrameworkThe Role of the Ballot is to roleplay as policymakers since this is the best way to achieve real world education.Joyner 99, Professor International Law @ Georgetwon, 99 (Christopher "TEACHING INTERNATIONAL LAW: VIEWS FROM AN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS POLITICAL SCIENTIST" ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law, Spring, 5 ILSA J Int'l and Comp L 377) Util is the only ethical system available to policymakers.Goodin 95 – Professor of Philosophy at the Research School of the Social Sciences at the Australian National University (Robert E., Cambridge University Press, "Utilitarianism As a Public Philosophy" pg 63) Thus the standard is maximizing well being.AND voluntary political participation is a fundamental ideal of democracy.Maria Eremenko, "Political participation: Model by Verba in the EU and Russia", National Research University, http://www.culturaldiplomacy.org/academy/content/pdf/participant-papers/eu/Maria-Eremenko-Political-participation-Model-by-Verba-in-the-EU-and-Russia.pdf Contention 1 Democracy participation:QI serves to shield police from accountabilityThe WSW is published by the International Committee of the Fourth International, the leadership of the world socialist movement, the Fourth International founded by Leon Trotsky in 1938. The WSWS aims to meet the need, felt widely today, for an intelligent appraisal of the problems of contemporary society. It addresses itself to the masses of people who are dissatisfied with the present state of social life, as well as its cynical and reactionary treatment by the establishment media.;wsws.org; US Supreme Court Expands Immunity for Killer Cops; 15; https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/11/12/pers-n12.html Police violence leads to lack of political participation.Liz Adetiba is a Politics Intern at The Huffington Post. She is a rising senior at the University of Chicago where she studies political science and human rights. You can reach her at liz.adetiba@huffingtonpost.com.; huffingtonpost.com; Watching Videos of Police Brutality Can Traumatize You, Especially if You're Black; 16; http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/watching-police-brutality-videos_us_577ee9b3e4b0344d514eaa5d Contention 2 Impacts:DemocideDemocracies check political violenceTimmerman 14 (Ashley M. Timmerman, BA at University of Central Florida, Summer 2014, "WHEN LEADERS REPRESS: A STUDY OF AFRICAN STATE," http://etd.fcla.edu/CF/CFE0005428/Masters_thesis_final.pdf MV) Disease:Democracy is a prerequisite to effectively combatting diseaseRuger 05, (Jennifer Prah, "Democracy and health". Harvard University, PhD, Health Policy. Yale University, MSL, Law. Oxford University, MSc, Comparative Social Research. Tufts University, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, MA, International Relations. (Qualified as hell) http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/qjmed/98/4/299.full.pdf Diseases causes extinctionDUJS 09, (Dartmouth Undergraduate Journal of Science, "Human Extinction: The Uncertainty of Our Fate", http://dujs.dartmouth.edu/spring-2009/human-extinction-the-uncertainty-of-our-fate) WarDemocracy is a critical impact filter - checks escalation for all warsHamburg 10, (David A., President Emeritus at Carnegie Corporation of New York, previously President of the Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences and President of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, previously chair of the department of psychiatry at Stanford, M.D. from Indiana University, "Recent advances in preventing mass violence") EconomyDemocracies lead in economic growth, development, crises management, political stability, and low inequalityKarakaya et. al 15 (Ugur Karakaya, the Gaziosmanpasa University Hasan Bulent Kantarci, Kocaeli University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, department of economics, "The Relationship between Democracy, Freedom, and Economic Development", World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic and Management Engineering Vol:9, No:6, 2015, http://www.waset.org/publications/10001565, al) EnvironmentEmpirical studies prove that democracies have more environmental protection than nondemocraciesBernauer et al. 13 (Thomas Bernauer, professor of political science at ETH Zurich, Tobias Böhmelt, Lecturer (Assistant Professor) in the Department of Government at the University of Essex, "National climate policies in international comparison: The Climate Change Cooperation Index", Environmental Science and Policy 25 (2013) 196 – 206, 1/13 Nuclear WarDemocratic consolidation is key to prevent nuclear warMuravchik, 2001 (Joshua, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, "Democracy and Nuclear Peace", http://www.npec-web.org/syllabi/muravchik.htm) Ethnic WarDemocracy is the only system that can reduce ethnic conflictTimothy D. Sisk, 8-1-2003, "Democracy and Conflict Management," Beyond Intractability Project, The Conflict Information Consortium, University Of Colorado, http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/democ-con-manag MV | 11/19/16 |
Red Ped AFFTournament: Grapevine | Round: 1 | Opponent: Burleson Centennial MS | Judge: Cavanaugh, Dylan Red Pedagogy AFF:1AC:FW:1. Truth does not exist independently of humans. For instance, individuals would have different interpretations of what is true if they were kept separate from each other. Thus, there are no a priori truth claims that can apply to every instance regardless of the context. Instead, we derive truth based on our relationships and agreements with others. Truth is intersubjective in that it can only exist based on the understanding and affirmation of certain identities and their relationship to others. Without this understanding or affirmation, it is impossible to claim anything as true since everything would be disagreed upon with no reason to prefer one interpretation over any other.2. Actions that we take are predicated upon confirming/furthering the identity that is based on an aggregate of interactions with others. Because of this, our identities are an established truth. This means that when we take any action, it perpetuates and legitimizes that identity.3. Identities are recognitive:a. If truth is intersubjective then when we come into the world and identify other agents we encounter alterity because it has already been given to them as a condition of their identity, and in order for us to recognize that they are other we have to look at their differences; this also means that you can only hold an identity if it is recognized by others because identities are intersubjective truths.b. When we look to understand alterity, it's impossible to look at all instances at once so we have to focus on specific groups and in doing so that inevitably excludes a forms of the other.c. Interaction with the other makes us vulnerable because we extend ourselves to the other and become vulnerable to the way that they construct our identities and our necessity for them to affirm our identity. This also opens the possibility for them to misrecognize us, or not recognize us at all.d. Precariousness must then be the condition for life because what someone considers to be living can only be possible if that person holds an identity that creates conditions for life, this also becomes true at the point that our identity is a form of truth, which is intersubjective.4. If we do not recognize the precarity of life, then we reject the system of intersubjectivity. If we do not recognize this system, then our conceptions of our own identity and how it is formed ceases to exist. It becomes permissible to misrecognize others, and thus our understanding of our own identity breaks down. We wouldn't be able to be recognized as people or an identity5. These norms of recognizing alterity predate us which forces us to evaluate why we should care in the first place. In order to engage in any interaction, including debate, we are already engaging with the structures of recognition to facilitate it. There are no instances in which someone is completely isolated from relationships who would be asking the questions about why this matters, because everyone is unwillingly cast into these relationships. Apprehending the recognition of alterity is a necessary step in making sure we don't misrecognize, or fail to recognize, the other in these inevitable confrontation.6. Thus the role of the ballot is to radically change pedagogical spaces to open up a dialogue that challenges colonialist ways of conceptualizing the Native American identity so that we can apprehend equal precariousness as a condition of lifeSandy Grande, 2004, associate professor and Chair of the Education Department at Connecticut College her research interfaces critical Indigenous theories with the concerns of education, Red Pedagogy Native American Social and Political Thought, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, https://academictrap.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/sandy-grande-red-pedagogy-native-american-social-and-political-thought.pdf 7. Ought is defined as mora obligations, an obligation is created when there is sufficient reason to actContentions:1. Uranium mining has harmed Navajo lands, uranium has plagued natives for generations.Jovana J. Brown, PhD, Her research centers on the participation of American Indian tribes in off-reservation environmental decision-making, and Lori Lambert, PhD, 2010, Blowing in the Wind: The Navajo Nation and Uranium, https://www.evergreen.edu/tribal/docs/blowinginthewindcasestudy.doc 2. Now HRI's mining will increase radiation levels up to 15 times over the regulatory limit, water and air will become unsafe for nearby residents.Jovana J. Brown, PhD, Her research centers on the participation of American Indian tribes in off-reservation environmental decision-making, and Lori Lambert, PhD, 2010, Blowing in the Wind: The Navajo Nation and Uranium, https://www.evergreen.edu/tribal/docs/blowinginthewindcasestudy.doc 3. Discourse is the first step, red pedagogy is key to understand the historic oppression inflicted upon natives and recognize them as people with identities.Clarke, Tracylee, 2010, Assistant Professor at California State University Channel Islands, Goshute Native American Tribe and Nuclear Waste: Complexities and Contradictions of a Bounded- Constitutive Relationship | 9/10/16 |
red ped aff 2Tournament: yes | Round: Finals | Opponent: Yes | Judge: yes Red Pedagogy AFF:1AC:FW:1. Truth does not exist independently of humans. For instance, individuals would have different interpretations of what is true if they were kept separate from each other. Thus, there are no a priori truth claims that can apply to every instance regardless of the context. Instead, we derive truth based on our relationships and agreements with others. Truth is intersubjective in that it can only exist based on the understanding and affirmation of certain identities and their relationship to others. Without this understanding or affirmation, it is impossible to claim anything as true since everything would be disagreed upon with no reason to prefer one interpretation over any other.2. Actions that we take are predicated upon confirming/furthering the identity that is based on an aggregate of interactions with others. Because of this, our identities are an established truth. This means that when we take any action, it perpetuates and legitimizes that identity.3. Identities are recognitive:a. If truth is intersubjective then when we come into the world and identify other agents we encounter alterity because it has already been given to them as a condition of their identity, and in order for us to recognize that they are other we have to look at their differences; this also means that you can only hold an identity if it is recognized by others because identities are intersubjective truths.b. When we look to understand alterity, it's impossible to look at all instances at once so we have to focus on specific groups and in doing so that inevitably excludes a forms of the other.c. Interaction with the other makes us vulnerable because we extend ourselves to the other and become vulnerable to the way that they construct our identities and our necessity for them to affirm our identity. This also opens the possibility for them to misrecognize us, or not recognize us at all.d. Precariousness must then be the condition for life because what someone considers to be living can only be possible if that person holds an identity that creates conditions for life, this also becomes true at the point that our identity is a form of truth, which is intersubjective.4. If we do not recognize the precarity of life, then we reject the system of intersubjectivity. If we do not recognize this system, then our conceptions of our own identity and how it is formed ceases to exist. It becomes permissible to misrecognize others, and thus our understanding of our own identity breaks down. We wouldn't be able to be recognized as people or an identity5. These norms of recognizing alterity predate us which forces us to evaluate why we should care in the first place. In order to engage in any interaction, including debate, we are already engaging with the structures of recognition to facilitate it. There are no instances in which someone is completely isolated from relationships who would be asking the questions about why this matters, because everyone is unwillingly cast into these relationships. Apprehending the recognition of alterity is a necessary step in making sure we don't misrecognize, or fail to recognize, the other in these inevitable confrontation.6. Thus the role of the ballot is to change current Native American conceptualization in terms of nuclear power, current legislation disproportionally effects Native Americans.Sandy Grande, 2004, associate professor and Chair of the Education Department at Connecticut College her research interfaces critical Indigenous theories with the concerns of education, Red Pedagogy Native American Social and Political Thought, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, https://academictrap.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/sandy-grande-red-pedagogy-native-american-social-and-political-thought.pdf 7. Ought is defined as sufficient reasonContentions:Contentions: Plan text: The United States and tribal governments ought to collaborate to prohibit the production of nuclear power and uranium mining.1. Uranium mining has harmed Navajo lands, uranium has plagued natives for generations; Native American oppression has been a direct product of nuclear energy development.Jovana J. Brown, PhD, Her research centers on the participation of American Indian tribes in off-reservation environmental decision-making, and Lori Lambert, PhD, 2010, Blowing in the Wind: The Navajo Nation and Uranium, https://www.evergreen.edu/tribal/docs/blowinginthewindcasestudy.doc 2. Now HRI's mining will increase radiation levels up to 15 times over the regulatory limit, water and air will become unsafe for nearby residents.Jovana J. Brown, PhD, Her research centers on the participation of American Indian tribes in off-reservation environmental decision-making, and Lori Lambert, PhD, 2010, Blowing in the Wind: The Navajo Nation and Uranium, https://www.evergreen.edu/tribal/docs/blowinginthewindcasestudy.doc 3. Discourse is the first step, red pedagogy is key to understand the historic oppression inflicted upon natives and recognize them as people with identities.Clarke, Tracylee, 2010, Assistant Professor at California State University Channel Islands, Goshute Native American Tribe and Nuclear Waste: Complexities and Contradictions of a Bounded- Constitutive Relationship Underview:Interpretation: If a debater advocates an interp, all debaters must only defend a paradigm that necessitates that the judge only vote for the debater who a) wins that a violated interp or counter interp of theirs is the better norm for debate and b) wins that the norm should operate as the most important level of the topicality or theory debate. To clarify: If my opponent initiates theory and does not violate this interp, then the ballot should be determined based on who wins that interp. If my opponent initiates theory and does violate, then the debate collapses down to this interp. But if this interp is violated but I lose the shell then we would move on to the next layer of the debate. | 10/15/16 |
Open Source
| Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
|---|