Tournament: none | Round: Finals | Opponent: none | Judge: none
I'm on Facebook as Bailey Dettmer and you can also reach me at baileydettmer@gmail.com to check interps or ask questions. Also, please let me know preferred pronouns and if there is anything that may be uncomfortable to you based on past experiences that I could read so that it is clarified in private. She/her

Tournament: Churchill | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kris Thomas Wright | Judge: Tim Davis

Part one is the Topic

In contemporary LD, both historically and in the status quo students in round often encounter a restriction on their constitutionally protected free speech and the restriction they encounter is the invoking of topicality as a way of nullifying the in round and political significance of the AC
Thus, I propose an alternative resolution: Resolved: In LD debate, affirmative debaters may not defend topical advocacies in order to win.
implications:
analytics

Part two is the Framework

The oppressed must liberate themselves, first in the form of pedagogy
Friere 3|"PEDAGOGY of the OPPRESSED" (http://www.users.humboldt.edu/jwpowell/edreformFriere'pedagogy.pdf) A.B.
"It is only … methods of dehumanization" (65-67).'
Thus, The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who advocates the best liberating dialogue

Part Three is the Advocacy

I defend that: Resolved: In LD debate, affirmative debaters may not defend topical advocacies as long as the AC and ballot story is a critique of norms in LD debate in order to win.
analytics

Part four is the Offense

Topic Selection is grounded in privilege which results in making already marginalized identities in debate irrelevant

Warner, Ede. 2003 (Professor in the Communication department at University of Louisville, Go Homers, Makeovers or Takeovers? A Privilege Analysis of Debate as a Gaming Simulation, pg. 5) BD

Procedures for … issues they faced.

Listen to Shaniqua’s story – status quo debate forces a normative method of engaging

Warner, Ede. 2003 (Professor in the Communication department at University of Louisville, Go Homers, Makeovers or Takeovers? A Privilege Analysis of Debate as a Gaming Simulation, pg. 7-8) BD

Shaniqua, an African … to truly exist. 

The only solution is to recognize our privileged debate training and embrace the possibility of both questioning and changing debate procedure

Warner, Ede. 2003 (Professor in the Communication department at University of Louisville, Go Homers, Makeovers or Takeovers? A Privilege Analysis of Debate as a Gaming Simulation, pg. 9-11) BD

The "obvious" solution … of the Gamemaster.