| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,15 @@ |
|
1 |
+**The affirmative calls for the ballot to validate their experiences—this results in judge consumption, where the judge votes aff just to feel better about themselves—this makes systemic change impossible and constrains the agency of their performance to a ballot–that turns the legitimacy of their performance.** |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Tonn 05 |
|
4 |
+Mari Boor Tonn, Associate Professor of Communication at the University of Maryland, College Park, PhD in Philosophy from the University of Kansas, “Taking Conversation, Dialogue, and Therapy Public,”Richmond Schools of Arts and Sciences, Rhetoric and Public Affairs 8.3, pp. 405-430, 2005. |
|
5 |
+Approaching public controversies through a conversational model... |
|
6 |
+AND |
|
7 |
+...bias. And nothing would have changed."83 |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+**And, introducing their performance into the competitive forum of debate re-inscribes the ideology of war, which targets the other—that turns their impacts—reject the aff’s method for debate.** |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+Chow 06 |
|
12 |
+Rey Chow, Professor Comparative Lit at Brown, Cultural Critic, Specializing in 20th-century Chinese Fiction and Film and Postcolonial Theory, Stanford University (1986), “The Age of the World Target,” pp. 40-42, January 1, 2006. |
|
13 |
+Often under the modest and apparently innocuous... |
|
14 |
+AND |
|
15 |
+...preoccupation with identity and its construction."57 |