| ... |
... |
@@ -1,13
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-**Counterplan Text: The United States ought to require that police officers use body-worn cameras when they are either interacting with the public or responding to calls for service.** |
| 2 |
|
-Grewal 15 |
| 3 |
|
-Madhuri Grewal, Senior Counsel at The Constitution Project, Previously a Policy Counsel at the Detention Watch Network, Graduate of American University Washington School of Law and the University of Michigan, “THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE USE OF BODY-WORN CAMERAS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT,” The Constitution Project Committee On Policing Reforms, January 28, 2015. DY |
| 4 |
|
-When to begin recording: Policies should set... |
| 5 |
|
-AND |
| 6 |
|
-...default should be to record the encounter. |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
-**And, that solves case–body-worn cameras have empirically reduced police misconduct by holding police accountable through on-scene evidence.** |
| 9 |
|
-Grewal 15 |
| 10 |
|
-Madhuri Grewal, Senior Counsel at The Constitution Project, Previously a Policy Counsel at the Detention Watch Network, Graduate of American University Washington School of Law and the University of Michigan, “THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE USE OF BODY-WORN CAMERAS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT,” The Constitution Project Committee On Policing Reforms, January 28, 2015. DY |
| 11 |
|
-IV. Potential Advantages of Body-Worn Cameras Advocates... |
| 12 |
|
-AND |
| 13 |
|
-...cameras cause officers to behave more professionally. |