| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,13 @@ |
|
1 |
+**Counterplan Text: The United States ought to require that police officers use body-worn cameras when they are either interacting with the public or responding to calls for service.** |
|
2 |
+Grewal 15 |
|
3 |
+Madhuri Grewal, Senior Counsel at The Constitution Project, Previously a Policy Counsel at the Detention Watch Network, Graduate of American University Washington School of Law and the University of Michigan, “THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE USE OF BODY-WORN CAMERAS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT,” The Constitution Project Committee On Policing Reforms, January 28, 2015. DY |
|
4 |
+When to begin recording: Policies should set... |
|
5 |
+AND |
|
6 |
+...default should be to record the encounter. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+**And, that solves case–body-worn cameras have empirically reduced police misconduct by holding police accountable through on-scene evidence.** |
|
9 |
+Grewal 15 |
|
10 |
+Madhuri Grewal, Senior Counsel at The Constitution Project, Previously a Policy Counsel at the Detention Watch Network, Graduate of American University Washington School of Law and the University of Michigan, “THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE USE OF BODY-WORN CAMERAS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT,” The Constitution Project Committee On Policing Reforms, January 28, 2015. DY |
|
11 |
+IV. Potential Advantages of Body-Worn Cameras Advocates... |
|
12 |
+AND |
|
13 |
+...cameras cause officers to behave more professionally. |