Changes for page Woodlands Yu Neg
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 0 added, 15 removed)
- Caselist.CitesClass[0]
- Caselist.CitesClass[1]
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
- Caselist.CitesClass[3]
- Caselist.CitesClass[4]
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
- Caselist.CitesClass[6]
- Caselist.CitesClass[7]
- Caselist.RoundClass[0]
- Caselist.RoundClass[1]
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
- Caselist.RoundClass[3]
- Caselist.RoundClass[4]
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
- Caselist.RoundClass[6]
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[0]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,2 +1,0 @@ 1 -fb-Derek Yu 2 -email-derekyu9@gmail.com - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-09-05 16:34:28.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Woodlands Yu Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0-Contact Info - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 --
- Caselist.CitesClass[1]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,38 +1,0 @@ 1 -====CP: Prohibit the production of nuclear power from all nuclear reactors that are not molten salt reactors==== 2 - 3 - 4 -====Solves for ~~insert adv here~~.==== 5 -Williams, Stephen ZME Science, "How Molten Salt Reactors Might Spell a Nuclear Energy Revolution". http://www.zmescience.com/ecology/what-is-molten-salt-reactor-424343/ July 4, 2016 6 -MSRs are walk-away safe. They cannot melt down as can conventional reactors 7 -AND 8 -of the rest of the available fuel in these rods to make electricity. 9 - 10 - 11 -===AT Meltdown=== 12 - 13 - 14 -====Reduces chances of meltdown==== 15 -Bullis, Kevin "Safer Nuclear Power, at Half the Price" MIT Technology Review https://www.technologyreview.com/s/512321/safer-nuclear-power-at-half-the-price/ 16 -A conventional nuclear power plant is cooled by water, which boils at a temperature 17 -AND 18 -operators on site to pull levers, it will coast to a stop." 19 - 20 - 21 -===AT Proliferation=== 22 - 23 - 24 -====Solves Proliferation==== 25 -Williams 2, Stephen ZME Science, "How Molten Salt Reactors Might Spell a Nuclear Energy Revolution". http://www.zmescience.com/ecology/what-is-molten-salt-reactor-424343/ July 4, 2016 26 -No nuclear reactor can be made proliferation proof, but MSRs have some significant advantages 27 -AND 28 -stockpiles of plutonium, making these materials unavailable for use in nuclear weapons. 29 - 30 - 31 -===AT Waste=== 32 - 33 - 34 -====MSR nuclear waste produced by 80x==== 35 -Bullis, Kevin "Safer Nuclear Power, at Half the Price" MIT Technology Review https://www.technologyreview.com/s/512321/safer-nuclear-power-at-half-the-price/ 36 -The new design improves on the original molten-salt reactor by changing the internal 37 -AND 38 -kilograms of waste that has to be stored for a few hundred years. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-09-16 01:10:03.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Woodlands Yu Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -CP - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Grapevine
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,26 +1,0 @@ 1 -=Indigenous Refusal CP= 2 - 3 - 4 -====~~Churchill~~ The Counterplan is the simple act of refusal. We must make the current system unmanageable to open up a new system of social organization that liberates the Fourth World. Churchill is the solvency advocate:==== 5 -Churchill, Ward. "The New Face of Liberation: Indigenous Rebellion, State Repression and the Reality of the Fourth World." No Date 6 -Fortunately, an alternative is conveniently at hand. It will be found in what 7 -AND 8 -of the system to utilize our resource in the process of dominating you. 9 - 10 - 11 -====~~Churchill~~ The US is following the historical path of empire. Only the CP results in the necessary disruption that prevents all current and future violations due to a dismantling of this empire. Churchill 2:==== 12 -Churchill, Ward. "'The Law Stood Squarely On Its Head': U.S. Doctrine, Indigenous Self-Determination, and the Question of World Order." in Acts of Rebellion: The Ward Churchill Reader Routledge (2003) 3-20 13 - "Its an old story, really," writes Phyllis Bennis, one of "a strategically 14 -AND 15 -global status quo.145 16 -~~Churchill 3~~ Complete break down of the statist system must be THE progressive goal- the US is a colonial system whose existence creates violence which means its destruction must come first Churchill 3 writes: 17 -Churchill, Ward. "The New Face of Liberation: Indigenous Rebellion, State 18 -AND 19 -; the problem is truly global - colonialism will be alive and well. 20 - 21 - 22 -==== ~~Coulter~~ And the aff has just lost- don't tell me that legal state action can change anything when First Nations have no right to exist in the US constitution. This is both a disad and a solvency deficit to the aff. Coulter '9:==== 23 -Coulter, Robert. "The U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: A Historic Change in International Law." 45 Idaho L. Rev. 539 2008-2009 24 -Sadly, we have seen the federal courts systematically dismantl~~e~~ the powers 25 -AND 26 -perceptible sea change in this centuries-long flood of injustice and conflict. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-09-16 01:11:53.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Woodlands Yu Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Indigenous STate CP - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Grapevine
- Caselist.CitesClass[3]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,19 +1,0 @@ 1 -====Prohibition of nuclear power would prompt shift to fossil fuels==== 2 -Gail E Tverberg "What The End Of Nuclear Power Would Actually Mean For The World What The End Of Nuclear Power Would Actually Mean For The World " http://www.businessinsider.com/what-would-be-the-impact-if-we-discontinued-nuclear-energy-2011-3 3 -Countries losing nuclear electric power would likely experience much higher unemployment, reduced tax revenue 4 -AND 5 -species goes extinct it's gone forever. We're playing a very dangerous game." 6 - 7 - 8 -====AND, acidification exponentially exacerbates warming.==== 9 -Lynas 08 (Mark Lynas, climate change writer, journalist, "Our Future on a Hotter Planet", p.78-79) 10 -Phytoplankton are also crucial to the global carbon cycle. Collectively they are the largest 11 -AND 12 -will spread in the oceans as warming and acidification take their unstoppable toll. 13 - 14 - 15 -====This means that every degree of warming dramatically increases the probability of extinction by worsening all these impacts and feeding into the vicious cycle of acidification. Darling and Sisterson 14:==== 16 -How to Change Minds about Our Changing Climate by Seth B. Darling and Douglas L. Sisterson, 2014, pg.31/32 17 -A key thing to keep in mind when it comes to the effects of climate 18 -AND 19 -can lessen our greenhouse-gas emissions will make the effect less severe. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-09-16 01:14:16.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Octas - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Woodlands Yu Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -WArming Da - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Grapevine
- Caselist.CitesClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,62 +1,0 @@ 1 -===Clean up discourse=== 2 - 3 - 4 -==== ~~Krupar~~ Clean up discourse reasserts a dichotomy between culture and nature, where nature is a "pure return" from the toxicity of waste, reaffirming the institutional logic that justified the destruction of the environment, Krupar '12==== 5 -Krupar, Shiloh. "Transnatural Ethics: Revisiting the Nuclear Cleanup of Rocky Flats, CO, Through the Queer Ecology of Nuclia Waste." Cultural geographies 19(3) 303-327 (2012) 6 -Waste was also moved 'off site' through burial. Rocky Flats's cleanup hinged upon 7 -AND 8 -uncertain hazards there, and unpredictable futurity of 'post-nuclear' ecology. 9 - 10 - 11 -===Remedial Environmental Ethics === 12 - 13 - 14 -====~~Mannon~~ Aff perpetuates a form of environmental ethics that reifies the status quo, Mannon '13==== 15 -Mannon, Ethan. "Kindred Ethics: Leopold and Badiou; Ecocriticism and Theory." Journal of Ecocriticism 5(1) 2013 16 -Badiou is clearly concerned about the way "ethics" has degenerated over time from 17 -AND 18 -, but would also chastise him for complaining about Leopold leaving them unanswered. 19 - 20 - 21 -==Impacts== 22 - 23 - 24 -===Turns the Aff=== 25 - 26 - 27 -====~~Krupar~~ K Turns the aff- this institutional logic legitimates nature as external and passive which is the justification for environmental destruction Krupar '12==== 28 -Krupar, Shiloh. "Transnatural Ethics: Revisiting the Nuclear Cleanup of Rocky Flats, CO, Through the Queer Ecology of Nuclia Waste." Cultural geographies 19(3) 303-327 (2012) 29 -The site and future social contestation by casting the Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge as 30 -AND 31 -at the site by the massive technoscientific reproduction of nature and its management. 32 - 33 - 34 -===Exclusion=== 35 - 36 - 37 -==== ~~Krupar~~ Relying on distinctions based on naturalness reinforces transphobia- only the alt resolves this impact, Krupar '12:==== 38 -Krupar, Shiloh. "Transnatural Ethics: Revisiting the Nuclear Cleanup of Rocky Flats, CO, Through the Queer Ecology of Nuclia Waste." Cultural geographies 19(3) 303-327 (2012) 39 -While great care must be taken when discussing the hazardous consequences of toxicity, this 40 -AND 41 -boundaries and bodies – for creative, often irreverent, embodied ecological arts. 42 - 43 - 44 -==== ~~Sandilands~~ Reifies forms of ecology of nature's purity that reifies the normativization and naturalization of a heterosexual paradigm that excludes those beyond the binary Sandilands '05:==== 45 -C. Mortimer-Sandilands, 'Unnatural Passions? Notes toward a Queer Ecology', Invisible Culture: An Electronic Journal for Visual Culture, 9, 2005, http://www.rochester.edu/in_visible_culture/Issue_9/ 46 -sandilands.html 47 -The fact that we now commonly understand sexuality as 48 -AND 49 -in particular, the politics of wilderness preservation and urban greening. 50 - 51 - 52 -===Alt cards=== 53 - 54 - 55 -==== ~~Krupar~~ The Alternative is to embrace transnatural ethics in an attempt to mark new subjectivities in relationship to waste, toxicity and radioactivity Krupar '12==== 56 -Krupar, Shiloh. "Transnatural Ethics: Revisiting the Nuclear Cleanup of Rocky Flats, CO, Through the Queer Ecology of Nuclia Waste." Cultural geographies 19(3) 303-327 (2012) 57 -The current decommissioning and conversion of US nuclear facilities and military arsenals into nature 58 -AND 59 -of a sticky web of connections or an ecology ~~of matter~~.'61 60 - 61 - 62 -to nuclear energy systems with such reactors. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-09-16 01:17:08.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Woodlands Yu Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -ecology k - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -gvine
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,15 +1,0 @@ 1 -Removing nuclear power doesn’t help the environment- it paves the way for coal and more damaging alternatives to become increasingly popular. Lynas 15. 2 -Lynas, Mark. "Why a Green Future Needs Nuclear Power." An Ecomodernist Manifesto. RSS, 18 June 2015. Web. 08 Aug. 2016. British author, journalist and environmental activist who focuses on climate change. He is a contributor to New Statesman, The Ecologist, Granta and Geographical magazines, and The Guardian and The Observer newspapers in the UK, holds a degree in history and politics from the University of Edinburgh http://www.ecomodernism.org/readings/2015/6/17/why-a-green-future-needs-nuclear-power JZ 3 -The success of the antinuclear movement in the 1970s guaranteed an increased use of coal for decades to come, as proposed nuclear plants across the western world were canceled and replaced by coal plants. There are countless stories with specific examples; one of my favorites is of the Austrian plant at Zwentendorf, a mid-size nuclear station. It was fully completed and then closed down in 1978 before it could generate a single watt after antinuclear activists narrowly won a nationwide referendum. Today, although Austria has 60 percent hydropower, it still burns coal and oil for a third of its electricity: had Zwentendorf and the other proposed nuclear plants been allowed to run by the nascent Greens, Austrians might have enjoyed carbon-neutral electricity for the past 35 years. The Zwentendorf story has an irresistible coda: in 2009 it was ‘converted’ into a solar power plant. At the opening ceremony, backed by enormous Greenpeace banners declaring ‘Energy Revolution – Climate Solution’ and featuring Hollywood celebrities like Andie MacDowell, 1,000 new solar photovoltaic panels were inaugurated, having been installed at a cost of 1.2 million euros. “From radioactive beams to sunbeams – a global symbol for environmentally friendly and sustainable energy for the requirements of the future,” said the website. A quick look at the numbers tells a different story, however: average output from the solar panels will be 20.5 kilowatts (enough to run 12 hairdryers, according to one wag) whereas the 692 megawatts it would have generated as a nuclear station would have lit up Vienna. One can chuckle at that kind of foolish hype, but less amusing is the history of Ireland’s proposed Carnshore reactors, which were canceled after protests, rallies, and concerts were organized by antinuclear groups in the mid-1970s. A large coal plant was built instead, at Moneypoint in County Clare. Moneypoint’s two chimneys, as well as being among Ireland’s tallest constructions, are now the largest single point source of CO2 emissions in the entire country. Some of Ireland’s electricity even comes from the only source worse than coal: peat. Peat is not only more CO2-intensive than coal, but is based on the shameful industrial strip-mining of large areas of fragile and biologically irreplaceable raised peat bog. In Spain nearly 40 nuclear plants were proposed in the 1970s, but a strong antinuclear movement succeeded in forcing a national moratorium in 1984 and only 10 were ever built. Spain today has 18 coal power plants, supplying a fifth of its power. In Australia, perhaps the most coal-dependent country in the world (despite its abundance of both solar potential and uranium deposits) nuclear power is technically illegal, thanks to a thriving antinuclear lobby and a senate vote in 1998. Australia’s per-capita carbon dioxide emissions as a result are about 18 tonnes (20 tons), higher even than America’s, with coal supplying 85 percent of domestic power. In some places, half-built nuclear plants were converted directly to coal: an example was the William H. Zimmer plant in Ohio, whose containment building was converted to house a coal boiler instead of a reactor following protests and cost overruns in 1984. As the nuclear historian Spencer Weart writes, “Ever since the price of oil spiked in the late 1970s, wherever people refused to build more reactors almost every new electrical plant had been a coal burner.” Each time this happened, determined antinuclear coalitions of thousands of environmentally concerned citizens melted away overnight once the embattled utility had agreed to change its proposed plant from nuclear to coal. Allens Creek, Texas; Bellefonte, Alabama; Cherokee, South Carolina; Erie, Ohio; Hartsville, Tennessee; Satsop, Washington… the full list of canceled US nuclear plants can be viewed on Wikipedia. At Shoreham in Long Island a nuclear plant was fully built, as at Zwentendorf in Austria, and then was immediately shut down due to enormous public opposition, much of it paid for and fanned by the efforts of diesel fuel delivery companies. Today it is a mausoleum – but had it been allowed to operate it would have helped make New York a carbon-neutral city for the last three decades. I calculate the total capacity of all the canceled nuclear plants to be about 140 gigawatts; roughly half the entire current installed coal capacity in the US. More than 1,000 nuclear plants were originally proposed; had they all been built, the US would now be running an entirely carbon-free electricity system. In the United States during the heyday of the antinuclear movement between 1972 and 1984, coal consumption by US utilities doubled from 351 million to 664 million tons. Although it is often claimed by greens that their antinuclear activities were less important than the 1970s oil shocks and economic slowdown in forcing the cancellation of planned nuclear plants, during the period 1972 to 1984 the US added 170 GW of fossil-fuelled capacity to its electricity grid, and consumed 74 percent more coal-fired electricity, hardly indicative of a major reversal in the growth of overall energy consumption. Certainly, the snowballing cost of nuclear plants was a major factor, but a significant proportion of those costs were being imposed by an ever-expanding nuclear regulatory burden which slowed or stopped development of new plants and spent fuel repositories – even more than environmental activism did. Nevertheless, constant objection by vocal antis generated increasing political risk and nuisance lawsuits and thus caused years of delays. That is not to say that the antinuclear activists liked coal. They said they wanted solar power, and the famous ‘nuclear power no thanks’ logo of course sported a smiling sun symbol. But just as they were spectacularly successful in stopping the growth of nuclear power, they were spectacularly unsuccessful in promoting the use of solar as an alternative. By 1984 the use of solar had risen from functionally zero to 0.002 percent of US electricity generation. The history of the antinuclear movement is therefore not lit by sunshine, but shrouded in coal smoke. 4 -Prefer my evidence a) 40 years of empirics conclude on my side b) trends are the same across three continents c) author quals- Lynas has been an environmental activist for over 10 years who focuses on nuclear power studies 5 -Australia empirically verifies coal tradeoff. 6 -Ben Heard 12 Masters of Corporate Environmental Sustainability Management, Monash University, 2007, environmental activist, Director of ThinkClimate Consulting, “That day in December: the story of nuclear prohibition in Australia”, Decarbonise SA, 12 Sep 2012, BE 7 -Since the prohibition of nuclear power, while nuclear build has taken off around the world, Australia has put into operation 2.5 GW more coal, is constructing another 3.2 GW, and has extended the life of the 1.6 GW of brown coal generation at Hazelwood in Victoria. We have put 4.6 GW of new gas into operation, with another 550 MW under construction. It appears our prohibition of nuclear in 1998 simply further reinforced our dependence on fossil fuels. This dependence has driven greenhouse emissions from electricity production 18 higher since 1998 (Australian Greenhouse Emissions Information System). 8 -Fossil Fuel use enables 10 degree temperature rises, aff exacerbates this 9 -Sir. John Houghton, 4/5/05, co-chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) , professor in atmospheric physics at the University of Oxford, former Chief Executive at the Met Office and founder of the Hadley Centre. Institue of Physics , Global warming, http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/0034-4885/68/6/R02/rpp5_6_R02.pdf?request-id=1c900945-f246-42ec-a806-e63190d24817, 1380 10 -7.6. Longer-term climate change From the beginning of the industrial revolution until 2000 the burning of fossil fuels released approximately 600 Gt of carbon in the form of CO2 into the atmosphere. Under the SRES A1B scenario (figure 18) a further 1500 Gt will be released by the year 2100. The reserves of fossil fuels in total are sufficient to enable their rate of use to continue to grow well beyond the year 2100. If that were to happen the global average temperaturewould continue to rise and could, in the 22nd century, reach very high levels, perhaps up to 10°C higher than today. 11 - 12 - The associated changes in climate would be correspondingly large and could well be irreversible 82. 13 -Warming forms a high way to extinction, slaughtering billions through starvation, flooding and disease 14 -Neo Hui Min, Straits Times Europe Bureau staff writer, April 7th 2007 “Billions face dire risk from global warming, says experts” http://www.wildsingapore.com/news/20070304/070406-14.htm#st 15 -BRUSSELS - TOP climate scientists issued their bleakest assessment yet on global warming yesterday, with a warning that billions of people could go thirsty as water supplies dry up and millions more may starve as farmlands become deserts. Poor tropical countries that are least to blame for causing the problem will be worst hit, said the report. Small island states, Asia's big river deltas, the Arctic, and sub- Saharan Africa are also at risk. Global warming could also rapidly thaw Himalayan glaciers that feed rivers from India to China, and bring heat waves to Europe and North America. The dire warnings came from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The final text of a 21-page Summary for Policymakers was agreed on after an all-night session marked by serious disputes. Scientists from more than 100 countries made up the panel. Their report forms the second of a four-part climate assessment, with the final section to be released early next month in Bangkok. Its findings are approved unanimously by governments and will guide policy on issues such as extending the United Nation's Kyoto Protocol, the main plan for capping greenhouse gas emissions, beyond 2012. The grim 1,400-page report issued yesterday said change, widely blamed on human emissions of greenhouse gases, was already under way in nature. The IPCC noted that damage to the earth's weather systems was changing rainfall patterns, punching up the power of storms and boosting the risk of drought, flooding and stress on water supplies. Some scientists even called the degree-by-degree projection a 'highway to extinction'. Add 1 deg C to the earth's average temperatures and between 400 million and 1.7 billion more people cannot get enough water. Add another 1.8 deg C and as many as two billion people could be without water, and about 20 per cent to 30 per cent of the world's species face extinction. More people will also start dying because of malnutrition, disease, heat waves, floods and droughts. This could happen as early as 2050. 'Changes in climate are now affecting physical and biological systems on every continent,' said the report. University of Michigan ecologist Rosina Bierbaum, former head of the United States' IPCC delegation, said: 'It is clear that a number of species are going to be lost.' Mr Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the IPCC, said: 'It's the poorest of the poor in the world, and this includes poor people even in prosperous societies, who are going to be the worst hit. 'This does become a global responsibility in my view.' Still, some scientists accused governments of watering down the forecasts. They said China, Russia and Saudi Arabia had raised most objections overnight, seeking to tone down some findings. Other participants also said the US, which pulled out of the Kyoto Protocol in 2001 saying it was too costly, had toned down some passages. Dr Pramod Kumar Aggarwal, one of the authors of the report, told The Straits Times that temperature increases could lead to crop failure and rising prices, with dire consequences for the poor. 'In Asia, you are talking about millions or billions of people,' he said. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-09-17 16:18:37.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -scoggin - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -west gg - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Woodlands Yu Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -warming v2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -ghill
- Caselist.CitesClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,40 +1,0 @@ 1 -==Framework== 2 - 3 - 4 -====~~Value~~I value justice, since the resolution questions what a just society ought to do.==== 5 - 6 - 7 -====~~One~~ First, knowledge is contingent on social and cultural circumstances. Particular cultures create rules for the use of normative sentences and how one ought to act, i.e a religious society would say moral actions are those inscribed in holy texts. Within this framework, actors develop their own concepts of the good and how it is to be interpreted, i.e when that society divides into religious sects==== 8 - 9 - 10 -==== ~~Habermas~~ Cultures, or particular livelihoods prescribe meaning to actions. However, there is not a single conception of the good life, Habermas:==== 11 -"The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory." Habermas, Jurgen; Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at the University of Frankfurt. 1998, MIT Press. 12 -Without the priority of the right over the good one cannot have an ethically neutral 13 -AND 14 -good, insofar as they cannot be a priori principles absent social context. 15 - 16 - 17 -==== ~~Implication~~Thus, systems of justice and ethics can only be socially constructed by participants in discourse. Since there are different conceptions of the good, participants must justify their version and present it to an audience. These discourses are predicated on equal participation. This is because there would never be mutual consensus if one view was actively excluded from the discussion. The agreements could no longer be binding or universal since others did not have the chance to combat those claims. ==== 18 -Further, this entails that a just society should protect freedom of expression since otherwise, participants couldn't contribute equally to the social discourse. 19 - 20 - 21 -==== ~~Criterion~~Thus, the criterion is maintaining open and equal access to dialogue. This means that not one single participants discursive position should be preferred outright over another's.==== 22 -For a harm to be intended it must be intrinsic to the actor's end and necessary means to achieve the end. To intend a harm is to will the means to create the harm whereas foreseeing a harm only implies apathy to its occurrence. This means intended harms have the only internal link to practical reason. 23 -Making a harm necessary is worse than making it possible because it makes the one's 24 -AND 25 -and sole contention is that hate speech regulation is inconsistent with discourse ethics. 26 - 27 - 28 -====Hate speech preempts the ability for agents to be in an equal position discursively. Rather than mutual respect, it confers a status of sub-humanity enhanced by the powerless position of marginalized groups within society. ==== 29 -Lawrence III, Charles. "If He Hollers Let Him Go: Regulating Racist Speech On Campus." Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1990, No. 3. June 01, 1990. Web. December 03, 2016. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1372554?seq=1~~#page_scan_tab_contents. 30 -Face-to-face racial insults, like fighting words, are undeserving of 31 -AND 32 -survival techniques of suppressing and disguising rage and anger at an early age. 33 - 34 - 35 -====Hate speech is a performative utterance that reformulates the speakers' positions on a continuum of power. Delgado==== 36 -Delgado, Richard. "Apologize And Move On? Finding A Remedy For Pornography, Insult, And Hate Speech." 67 UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO LAW REVIEW 93. 1996. Web. December 04, 2016. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2411632. 37 -Rather, the racial insult is more like a performative. An instrument of oppression 38 -AND 39 -, in any sense, invite discourse.'17 40 -*Ellipsis from source - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-17 19:36:49.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -asdf - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -adsf - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Woodlands Yu Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NC-Habermas - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -strake
- Caselist.CitesClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,0 @@ 1 -A: The role of the ballot is to vote for the policy that better proves the desirability of the resolutional statement. The aff must defend only a post fiat policy option that affirms under the res. 2 - 3 -A the aff must defend a topical policy option affirming the resolution - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-17 19:42:16.914 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -asdf - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -adsf - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Triples - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Woodlands Yu Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -T interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -strake
- Caselist.RoundClass[0]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-09-05 16:34:26. 01 +2016-09-05 16:34:26.386
- Caselist.RoundClass[1]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-09-16 01:10:01.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Grapevine
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-09-16 01:11:51.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Grapevine
- Caselist.RoundClass[3]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-09-16 01:14:14.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Octas - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Grapevine
- Caselist.RoundClass[4]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-09-16 01:17:06.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -- - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -gvine
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-09-17 16:18:35.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -scoggin - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -west gg - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -ghill
- Caselist.RoundClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-17 19:36:46.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -asdf - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -adsf - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -strake
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-17 19:42:15.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -asdf - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -adsf - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Triples - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -strake