| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,9 @@ |
|
1 |
+Counterplan text: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought to allow students to opt for which student organizations their mandatory student fees are allocated to. This denies the guarantee of equal distribution of fees to all campus groups. |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+That’s competitive- in the University of Wisconsin v. Southworth the Supreme Court ruled that if a college requires mandatory student fees they must be distributed equally to all campus groups; anything else fails to be viewpoint neutral and is a restriction on the speech of other students. Kennedy. |
|
4 |
+Kennedy, Anthony. “BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV. OF WIS. SYSTEMV. SOUTHWORTH.” BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV. OF WIS. SYSTEMV. SOUTHWORTH, 9 Nov. 1999, www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/98-1189.ZS.html. JZ |
|
5 |
+Petitioner, Board of ...the program requires. Pp. 16—17. |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+People should not be forced to subsidize the speech of others- that subverts their means for the ends of others. Leef 2k. |
|
8 |
+Leef, George C. “Mandatory Student Fees and Freedom of Speech.” FEE Freeman Article, Aug. 2000, fee.org/articles/mandatory-student-fees-and-freedom-of-speech/. George Leef is the former book review editor of The Freeman. He is director of research at the John W. Pope Center for Higher Education Policy. JZ |
|
9 |
+The university must ... for Student Organizations!” |