| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,61 @@ |
|
1 |
+=Antiblackness= |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====Blackness is ontological – the natal alienation of black bodies produced through the Middle Passage is a singular structuring event that has shaped the foundations of civil society. The affirmative relies on a politics that seeks to situate various contingent identities such as "immigrant" "worker" and "queer" within the world and attempts to justify their incorporation into the category of capital H Humanity. Their radicalism is still reliant on liberal modernism and enlightenment conceptions of humanism that are only possible due to the violent exclusion of the Black. Whereas the conflicts the aff discusses can be resolved via decolonialism, opening of borders, making everyone citizens, Blackness is an antagonism to civil society that cannot be resolved. Any attempt at animating and incorporating the black body into civil society fail because they ignore the ontological dimension of anti-blackness==== |
|
5 |
+**Wilderson 10** - Prof. of African American studies and drama at UC Irvine ~~Frank B., III, "Red, White and Black: Cinema and the Structure of U.S. Antagonisms," Duke University Press 2010, Pg. 9-11~~ |
|
6 |
+I have little interest in assailing political conservatives. Nor is my argument wedded to |
|
7 |
+AND |
|
8 |
+split occur? The woman at the gates of Columbia University awaits an answer |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+====The affirmative begins from the wrong starting point, they theorize race relations from a white/non-white divide in which racial oppression and violence eminates from a state saturated in whiteness. HOWEVER, this is an important distinction, theories of racism rather than theories of anti-blackness ignores the singularity and structural nature of slavery and the middle passage. Specifically in the context of immigration politics and challenges for immigrant rights, this manifests itself in two ways 1) it constructs the myth of Black citizenship, rather than recognizing that blackness has no place in the world. 2) it assumes a political system based on legality and illegality which assumes violence is contingent upon a TRANSGRESSION of the law, however antiblack violence is gratuitous and Blackness is always seen as illegal. ALL politics should begin from the starting point of the Black/non-Black divide, only the alt can do this: this is a reason the permutation can never capture the alt because it will always try to force black politic into a white/non-white political paradigm.==== |
|
12 |
+**Nopper, 11** ~~Tamara, sociology professor at Temple University, "Race, Illegality, and Detention," http://tamaranopper.com/2011/12/18/race-illegality-and-detention-my-remarks-at-imprisoned-forgotten-and-deported/~~ |
|
13 |
+I want to explore how race and racism are conceptualized and the implications for how |
|
14 |
+AND |
|
15 |
+Black and ‘innocent’ is an oxymoron in the world we live in." |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+====The identity politics of the affirmative cannot account of the complete nonrelation of the Black corpse and only mystifies anti-black violence by placing it on a plane of equivalence with all other contingent violence while ignoring that there is no grammar of suffering capable of describing or comprehending anti-black violence. Alt is prerequisite to the affirmative==== |
|
19 |
+**Wilderson 10** |
|
20 |
+Frank, Associate Professor at UC Irvine’s Department of Drama and African American Studies, Red, White and Black: Cinema and the Structure of U.S. Antagonisms, 314-6 |
|
21 |
+Until one can demonstrate how the corporeal integrity of the Black has indeed been repaired |
|
22 |
+AND |
|
23 |
+of cinema lets ordinary White film say what extraordinary White folks will not. |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+====The position of the slave is trapped between the subjective and objective vertigo that produces the violence of political economy. The Affirmative understands violence as a response to intra-Human conflicts of citizenship, borders, labour, gender, sex, and police brutality. This is because while the affirmative can point to the specific contingent causes of violence for immigrants and their solutions, i.e. subjective vertigo, for the Black there is no cause to politio-social violence and racial terror. This renders the logic of the affirmative unaccountable to ontological violence of black suffering constructed by the violence of anti-blackness. This is only possible because the affirmative is fighting for a place IN THE WORLD while ignoring that Blackness has no place and is excluded FROM THE WORLD.==== |
|
27 |
+**Wilderson 11 **Prof. of African American studies and drama at UC Irvine ~~Frank B., III, "The Vengeance of Vertigo: Aphasia and Abjection in the Political Trials of Black Insurgents," InTensions Journal Iss. 5 Fall/Winter 2011 http://www.yorku.ca/intent/issue5/articles/frankbwildersoniii.php |
|
28 |
+~~2~~ With only small arms and crude explosives at their disposal, with |
|
29 |
+AND |
|
30 |
+with the myriad maps and frameworks which explain the dispossession of Human subalterns. |
|
31 |
+ |
|
32 |
+ |
|
33 |
+====Our Alternative is to reject the affirmative in order to focus on an unflinching paradigmatic analysis of anti-blackness within Civil Society that is necessary for the End of the World. ==== |
|
34 |
+**Wilderson 10. **- Prof. of African American studies and drama at UC Irvine ~~Frank B., III, "Red, White and Black: Cinema and the Structure of U.S. Antagonisms," Duke University Press 2010, Pg. 9-11~~ |
|
35 |
+ (Frank "Unspeakable Ethics", Red, White, and Black: Cinema |
|
36 |
+AND |
|
37 |
+it is important to affirm Revolutionary Suicide as a life-affirming ethic. |
|
38 |
+ |
|
39 |
+ |
|
40 |
+=Case.= |
|
41 |
+ |
|
42 |
+ |
|
43 |
+====Look, the aff is at at best lesson in how to survive in the world as a Slave, the alternative is a lesson in how to not be a Slave in the first place. ==== |
|
44 |
+Chico 2009 ~~"Some Curious Things About ‘Afropessimism’," Cosmic Hoboes, May 19, 2009, http://cosmichoboes.blogspot.com/2009/05/some-curious-things-about-afropessimism.html~~ |
|
45 |
+This distinction— between "blacks are human subjects who are sometimes treated badly" |
|
46 |
+AND |
|
47 |
+within any politics that takes the modern order as its presumption and premise. |
|
48 |
+ |
|
49 |
+ |
|
50 |
+====There is an ontological distinction between slavery and colonialism – the affirmative papers over the structural position of blackness and replicates the humanist logic of emancipation.==== |
|
51 |
+**Sexton 10** - **prof of African American Studies in the School of Humanities at UC Irvine (Jared, ‘The Curtain of the Sky’: An Introduction, (2010): 36–37) ** |
|
52 |
+Yet, for Wilderson, there is a qualitative difference, an ontological one, |
|
53 |
+AND |
|
54 |
+within this theoretical horizon if it is to attain what is most essential. |
|
55 |
+ |
|
56 |
+ |
|
57 |
+====The logic of coalitions depends on an assumptive framework of commonality between political subjects – this conceptualization of a ‘we’ founds the permutations radicalism within liberal inclusionism which by DEFINTION and NECESSITY must continually rearticulate otherness as it locates ever new subjects to include. ==== |
|
58 |
+**Sexton 2016** ~~Jared, Prof of African American Studies @ UC Irvine, Afro-Pessimism: The Unclear World, Rhizomes, Issue 29, http://www.rhizomes.net/issue29/sexton.html~~ |
|
59 |
+Astonishingly, all of this refuses to countenance the rhetorical dimensions of the discourse of |
|
60 |
+AND |
|
61 |
+of violence that underwrites so many violent acts, whether spectacular or mundane. |