Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[12]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[10]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[12]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-02-04 18:46:59.639
	1	+2017-02-04 18:46:59.0

Caselist.CitesClass[10]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,90 @@
	1	+===Part 1 is the Case===
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+====Campus restrictions of free speech are assumed to benefit the good of the student body; however, faith in liberal institutions such as the government or the university is a misguided belief based on a misunderstanding of how power operates. Power is not simply the exertion of the state or an individual’s will over a subordinated person, rather power exists in a field of relations and is not a traditional hierarchy of domination. ====
	5	+
	6	+
	7	+====Status quo limitations on speech and current speech codes have destroyed higher education as a space for open dialogue. Reclaiming the university as space for open discourse is critical to our future. Only a paradigm shift to free speech can solve. ====
	8	+**Giroux ’14:**
	9	+Giroux, Henry A. "Austerity and the Poison of Neoliberal Miseducation." Symploke22.1-2 (2014): 15-19. Project MUSE ~~Johns Hopkins UP~~. Web. 19 Jan. 2017. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/566830/pdf.
	10	+Most importantly, higher education too often informs a deadening dystopian vision of corporate America
	11	+AND
	12	+as an integral thread in the ever-evolving fabric of living democracy.
	13	+
	14	+
	15	+====Speech codes operate under the guise of an oppressive ruse of resistance that privileges elites. This biopolitical control is utilized by structures to de-mobilize political and social dissent and create docile bodies. ====
	16	+**Lippens and Crewe ‘09:**
	17	+Lippens, Ronnie, and Don Crewe. Existentialist Criminology. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009. Print. (0:30)
	18	+Indeed, Foucault’s treatment of power, mobilized and activated through speech codes or even
	19	+AND
	20	+point at which the individual is thoroughly disciplined and rendered a docile body.
	21	+
	22	+
	23	+====And, these fashioned docile bodies are exposed to extreme violence and dehumanization. ====
	24	+**Dean ’01:**
	25	+Mitchell Dean, Professor of Sociology at Macquarie University, 2k1 ("Demonic Societies: Liberalism, biopolitics, and sovereignty." Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State, ed. Hanson and Stepputat, p. 55-58) (0:30)
	26	+Consider again the contrastive terms in which it is possible to view biopolitics and sovereignty
	27	+AND
	28	+according to Foucault. in the functioning of the modern state (232).
	29	+
	30	+
	31	+====Biopower is the enabling precondition that allows for racism to be inscribed and codified into law. This saturates civil society with violence, making war structurally inevitable. Only challenging normalizing assumptions can prevent us from this fate.====
	32	+**Mendieta ’02:**
	33	+Mendieta, Eduardo. "‘To Make Live and to Let Die’ –Foucault on Racism." Pgs 7-8. Stonybrook.edu. APA Central Division Meeting, 25 Apr. 2002. Web. 25 Jan. 2017. http://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/philosophy/people/faculty'pages/docs/foucault.pdf. (0:45)
	34	+This is where racism intervenes, not from without, exogenously, but from within
	35	+AND
	36	+of the living, then these threat and foes are biological in nature.
	37	+
	38	+
	39	+====Thus, I affirm. Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. ====
	40	+
	41	+
	42	+====We use the resolution as a starting point for a genealogy and an interrogation of the ways in which power operates through speech and speech codes. ====
	43	+
	44	+
	45	+====Only individual rejections of bodies of knowledge by those bound up within them, as experts, can solve. ====
	46	+**Edkins 06:**
	47	+Jenny Edkins, International Politics, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, 2006. "The Local, the Global and the Troubling," Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Vol. 9, No. 4, 499–511 (0:30)
	48	+First, intellectuals are of course not as separate from political and social structures as
	49	+AND
	50	+effect, but through a slow re-building, brick by brick.
	51	+
	52	+
	53	+====Critical analysis starting from the university is key. Only higher education sparks new political subjectivities capable of challenging normativity. ====
	54	+**Evans and Pollard ’14:**
	55	+Pollard, Tyler J. "Education, the Politics of Resilience, and the War on Youth: A Conversation with Brad Evans." Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies 36.3 (2014): 193-213. Web. 25 Jan. 2017. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10714413.2014.917902?journalCode=gred20. (0:30)
	56	+Brad Evans ~~hereafter referred to as BE~~: I think a good place to
	57	+AND
	58	+method then I think it's basically just a retreat into a sovereign conceit.
	59	+
	60	+
	61	+**====Our genealogy is an ongoing process that resists normalization. ====**
	62	+**Flyvberg and Richardon 2 – dept of development @ Aalborg University**
	63	+(Bent, Aalborg University, Department of Development and Planning and Tim, University of Sheffield, Department of Town and Regional Planning, Planning and Foucault: In Search of the Dark Side of Planning Theory, http://flyvbjerg.plan.aau.dk/DarkSide2.pdf.) (1:00)
	64	+3. Towards Foucault Instead of side-stepping or seeking to remove the traces
	65	+AND
	66	+versus ‘constitution’ thinking, about struggle versus control, conflict versus consensus.
	67	+
	68	+
	69	+===Part 2 is Framework===
	70	+
	71	+
	72	+====Because power is concerned with structuring fields of action, fighting oppression comes in the form of critical analysis against normalization of power in our lives. ====
	73	+**Taylor ’09.**
	74	+Taylor, Dianna. "Normativity and Normalization." Foucault Studies 7 (2009): 59-63. Print. (0:40)
	75	+Habermas’s primary criticism of Foucault is that he engages in performative contradictions which throw him
	76	+AND
	77	+which shape but do not determine the nature of such acknowledgment and engagement.
	78	+
	79	+
	80	+====This has 3 implications for the debate:====
	81	+Traditional ethical theories fail as guiding principles because they can’t see the inherent harms within their framing
	82	+Critical analysis is necessary to enact policy as impacts are indeterminate without revealing structural violence
	83	+Rejection, even with action, is not enough to overcome harmful normalization. Only an environment fostering constant analysis can uncover structural violence.
	84	+
	85	+
	86	+====Criticism is the ultimate responsibility of intellectuals, necessary to ensure that reforms and revolutions don’t replicate the problems they seek to address. The ballot represents an endorsement of a critical genealogy designed to unmask the ways in which power operates. ====
	87	+Michel **Foucault**, Professor, College de France, "Human Nature: Justice Versus Power," Noam Chomsky Debates with Michel Foucault, International Philosophers Project, 19**71**. Available from the World Wide Web at: http://www.chomsky.info/debates/1971xxxx.htm.
	88	+"It seems to me that the real political task in a society such as
	89	+AND
	90	+to see this class power reconstitute itself even after an apparent revolutionary process."

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-02-04 18:47:00.979

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Dino De La O

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Southlake Carroll PD

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+12

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Winston Churchill Young Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JANFEB - Power Genealogy

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Colleyville Heritage