Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[4]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[2]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[4]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-11 20:13:16.651
	1	+2017-01-11 20:13:16.0

Caselist.CitesClass[2]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,63 @@
	1	+====We begin with two different ways to evaluate a debate round: ====
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+====Judgment: a metaphysical view harkening back to prophetic claims of judgment day, putting you in the position to decide between good and evil. This type of thinking is aligned with the empire of good. ====
	5	+
	6	+
	7	+====OR====
	8	+
	9	+
	10	+====We say that you should evaluate our arguments as expressive of our life stories and views on life. Our strategy will be expressive of our genuine affirmation of destiny and sovereignty though our radical conception of speaking evil. This is opposed to the empire of good. ====
	11	+
	12	+
	13	+====Use the ballot as a rupture in the form of a singularity into the banal debate system by a breaking-in of our critique and speaking evil into the machine.====
	14	+Baudrillard in 98 ~~Jean, dead french dude, Paroxysm, p. 51~~
	15	+His singularity. Not Individuality, and not collectivity either, because this has become
	16	+AND
	17	+isn't a catastrophic fatality. Appearance and disappearance are the form of destiny.
	18	+
	19	+
	20	+====So, we affirm Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech.
	21	+====
	22	+
	23	+
	24	+====Our affirmation comes about through our fatal strategy of thinking evil. We Affirm the resolution as it is affirming the evil from the resolution that exists in a way that does not attempt to make the world better. ====
	25	+
	26	+
	27	+====To think evil means that we are complicit in everything that happens to us. Our participation in the intelligence of evil acknowledges that we are great enough for our own evil genius.====
	28	+
	29	+
	30	+====Baudrillard 05 ~~Jean, dead french dude, The Intelligence of Evil, p. 151-154~~====
	31	+Then we shall
	32	+AND
	33	+Never explain, never complain.
	34	+
	35	+
	36	+====We draw a distinction between two types of strategies – the fatal and the banal. Critical theory is banal, always recycling the same notions of subjectivity, responsibility, and dialectical progress.====
	37	+
	38	+
	39	+====Our strategy is fatal – it is aligned with fate, and is desired to die. The subject and the object are reversible and irreconcilable. Our fatal strategy analyzes the world from the perspective of the object because that view diverts the system and object from its intended goal.====
	40	+
	41	+
	42	+====Debate has a fatal destiny, it was invented as a rational political medium, but that has been abandoned. Debate mirrored the political disenchantment for students through the civil rights era. It is now a magical medium, void of the real. ====
	43	+
	44	+
	45	+====
	46	+====
	47	+
	48	+
	49	+====We are resolved to become resolution. The 1ac adopts the resolution as a strategy of destiny. We affirm the evil of the resolution, we put subjectivity back onto the path of disappearance that puts us on a chain of symbolic forms causing a transference of identity and destiny that makes life sovereign. ====
	50	+Baudrillard 5 ~~Jean, dead french dude, The Intelligence of Evil, p. 207-212~~
	51	+We have all been everywhere in some past life. This suprasensory reminiscence, this
	52	+AND
	53	+experience language as a kind of predestination - a kind of happy predestination.
	54	+
	55	+
	56	+====
	57	+====
	58	+
	59	+
	60	+====The fate of our current world is at an exponential stake, all of society is caught up in the condemnation and re-imbursement of misfortunes in a massive whitewashing of history and suffering. But this is were we are headed, let us not turn our heads abashedly. We can’t go back and change history. Instead we should transfer the whole terrorist battle for and against the system to the symbolic level where we as individuals capable of radical thought have the upper hand. Any combat or change that the lever of the real fails because it still participates in the fundamental nature of the modern world system. The empire of the good. The real is stuck in a cycle of misfortune and social violence that must be dislodged and put onto a different trajectory, at the symbolic level.====
	61	+
	62	+
	63	+====The evisceration of evil only exacerbates problems symbolically – this is why speaking evil is important. It teaches us to make symbolic problems disappear from the symbolic and is not involved in producing more economies of violence and misfortune.====

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-11 20:13:18.41

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Alberto Tohme

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Cy-Fair TW

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+4

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Winston Churchill Young Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Baudrillard

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Strake Jesuit