Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[14]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[27]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[14]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-02-19 18:10:25.453
	1	+2017-02-19 18:10:25.0

Caselist.CitesClass[27]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,36 @@
	1	+====Interp: On the JanFeb 2017 topic the affirmative must defend that public colleges and universities ought not restrict ANY constitutionally protected speech. ====
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+====Any is defined as every====
	5	+**Your Dictionary NO DATE** (Your Dictionary, online reference, "any," http://www.yourdictionary.com/any///
	6	+every: any child can do it
	7	+
	8	+
	9	+====Any is an indefinite pronoun that refers to things generally ====
	10	+**Language NO DATE** (Online English grammar textbook, Unit 42: - Indefinite Pronouns," http://www.1-language.com/englishcoursenew/unit42_grammar.htm///
	11	+Indefinite pronouns replace specific things with general, non-specific concepts. For example
	12	+AND
	13	+anything from the supermarket. - Do you need anything from the supermarket?
	14	+
	15	+
	16	+====Violation: The plan ends restrictions surrounding specific forms of speech====
	17	+
	18	+
	19	+====Standards:====
	20	+
	21	+
	22	+====Limits – allowing plan affs around specified kinds of speech justifies a limitless number of affs that ban types of speech i.e. hate speech, specific words, and speech in specified time and places, the list goes on and on. Two impacts—====
	23	+
	24	+
	25	+====Fairness—means that the neg has a limitless number of affs to prepare case negs to which results in shallow engagement and the same generics. Fairness is a voter, debate is a competitive activity and both sides need equal access to the ballot.====
	26	+
	27	+
	28	+====Education—shallow engagement means we never actually learn about the aff topic lit in depth—education is a voter it's the reason why schools fund debate. ====
	29	+
	30	+
	31	+====Topical version of the aff – remove restrictions surrounding all forms of constitutionally protected speech – solves 100 of your offense because it ensures we can still discuss the aff but allows for the neg to access links to our generics. ====
	32	+
	33	+
	34	+====Drop the debater on T.====
	35	+1~~ sets a precedent in favor of a positive model of debate—wins and losses determine the direction of activity
	36	+2~~ Deterrence—Dropping the debater will be best because it shows that they

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-02-19 18:10:29.596

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Miriam Leany

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Harvard-Westlake SP

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+14

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Winston Churchill Coltzer Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JanFeb T- any

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Berkeley