Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,71 +1,0 @@
1		-====A~~ Interpretation: The affirmative must defend the prohibition of production of nuclear power by a country or countries. We don't mandate any means of presenting evidence, but rather just what the advocacy of the 1AC is.====
2		-
3		-
4		-===='Resolved' denotes a proposal to be enacted by law ====
5		-Words and Phrases 64 Permanent Edition
6		-Definition of the word "resolve," given by Webster is "to express an
7		-AND
8		-," which is defined by Bouvier as meaning "to establish by law".
9		-
10		-
11		-====B~~ Violation: they don't defend an action to be undertaken by a country and CX proves—if we prove the topic is bad that still doesn't disprove her advocacy.====
12		-
13		-
14		-====C~~ Net benefits—====
15		-
16		-
17		-====1~~ Debate requires a specific point of difference in order to promote effective exchange—stasis in the topic is key to engagement.====
18		-Steinberg and Freeley 13, * David, Lecturer in Communicatio22n studies and rhetoric. Advisor to Miami Urban Debate League. Director of Debate at U Miami, Former President of CEDA. And ** Austin, attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, JD, Suffolk University, Argumentation and Debate, Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 121-4
19		-Debate is a means of settling differences, so there must be a controversy,
20		-AND
21		-particular point of difference, which will be outlined in the following discussion.
22		-
23		-
24		-====The impact outweighs—deliberative debate models impart skills vital to respond to social problems====
25		-Christian O. Lundberg 10 Professor of Communications @ University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, "Tradition of Debate in North Carolina" in Navigating Opportunity: Policy Debate in the 21st Century By Allan D. Louden, p. 311
26		-The second major problem with the critique that identifies a naivety in articulating debate and
27		-AND
28		-with the existential challenges to democracy ~~in an~~ increasingly complex world.
29		-
30		-
31		-====Engaging the law through in-depth debate is critical to solve their impacts====
32		-Harris 94, professor of law – UC Berkeley, '94 (Angela P., 82 Calif. L. Rev. 741)
33		-CRT has taken up this method of internal critique. Like the crits, race
34		-AND
35		-not to topple the Enlightenment, but to make its promises real. n66
36		-
37		-
38		-====T version of Aff solves====
39		-
40		-
41		-====Drop the debater:====
42		-
43		-
44		-====1~~ Time skew puts me at a disadvantage on substance.====
45		-
46		-
47		-====2~~ Sets a precedent that debaters can't run unfair arguments.====
48		-
49		-
50		-====3~~ Dropping them is key to rectify the abuse that has already occurred in the round.====
51		-
52		-
53		-====Competing Interps over Reasonability:====
54		-
55		-
56		-====1~~ No brightline, competing interps are the most fair as it comes down to who debated theory better.====
57		-
58		-
59		-**====2~~ Competing interpretations creates an incentive to promote fair debate because it forces debaters to defend their interpretations.====**
60		-
61		-
62		-====No RVIs:====
63		-
64		-
65		-====1~~ It's reciprocal—they could run theory and generate offense on the same layer of debate. ====
66		-
67		-
68		-====2~~ RVI's kill substance because it incentivizes both debaters to go all in on theory because it's the highest layer of the debate—outweighs because the topic only lasts two months. ====
69		-
70		-
71		-====3~~ Chilling effect—discourages checking abuse because cheap debaters will prep out common interps.====

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-10 01:43:32.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Chris Castillo

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Edina GL

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-3

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Westwood Shhah Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Sept Oct ~-~- T ~-~- Defend Rez

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Grapevine