Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[21]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[21]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,26 +1,0 @@
1		-====The affirmative discourse represents an inherently unstable world needing short term solutions to constant threats this form of security logic authorizes global domination and violence====
2		-**Chernus 01.** Ira Chernus. Chernus is a Professor of Religious Studies at the University of Colorado at Boulder. 2001. ~~"Fighting Terror in The National Insecurity State," http://spot.colorado.edu/~~chernus/WaronTerrorismEssays/FightingTerror.htm~~ VR
3		-Just as the outcome of World War I sowed the seeds of World War II
4		-AND
5		-hope for a better, a more peaceful, a genuinely secure future.
6		-
7		-
8		-====Your terror discourse enables mass state violence====
9		-**Jackson 9** (Senior Researcher @ Centre for the Study of Radicalization and Contemporary Political Violence, Richard, Reader in the Department of International Politics @ Aberystwyth University, Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda, ed. Jackson, Smyth, and Gunning, p.77-80)
10		-In contrast to first order critique, second order critique involves the adoption of a
11		-AND
12		-legitimise actually serves distinctly political purposes and has clear ideological consequences for society.
13		-
14		-
15		-====Securitization is a product of hegemonic forms of knowledge about politics – meaning K is a pre-req because we don't know if the 1AC is true based on statistics until we correct for our flawed reps in policy. Security is also the root cause of war and environmental destruction – turns case.====
16		-Burke 7. ~~Anthony, Senior Lecturer in Politics and International Relations at UNSW, Sydney, Theory and Event, 10:2, "Ontologies of War: Violence, Existence and Reason," Muse~~
17		-My argument here, whilst normatively sympathetic to Kant's moral demand for the eventual abolition
18		-AND
19		-to end the global rule of insecurity and violence? Will our thought?
20		-
21		-
22		-====The alternative is to reject the affirmative's security discourse – the act of situating ourselves against security in all forms through the means of debate is the only way to be emancipated from the deep entrenchment of security in our minds and society.====
23		-Mark **Neocleous**, Professor of Political Economy at Brunel University, 20**08**, "Critique of Security", McGill-Queen's University, pp. 184-186, Published 2008
24		-The only way out of such a dilemma, to escape the fetish, is
25		-AND
26		-; it requires us to be brave enough to return the gift.143

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-10-15 23:40:17.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Ashan Peiris

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Strake Jesuit MC

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-25

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-4

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Westwood Shhah Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-SO - K - Security

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-St Marks