Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[3]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[3]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-09-10 01:43:29.494
	1	+2016-09-10 01:43:29.0

Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,71 @@
	1	+====A~~ Interpretation: The affirmative must defend the prohibition of production of nuclear power by a country or countries. We don't mandate any means of presenting evidence, but rather just what the advocacy of the 1AC is.====
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+===='Resolved' denotes a proposal to be enacted by law ====
	5	+Words and Phrases 64 Permanent Edition
	6	+Definition of the word "resolve," given by Webster is "to express an
	7	+AND
	8	+," which is defined by Bouvier as meaning "to establish by law".
	9	+
	10	+
	11	+====B~~ Violation: they don't defend an action to be undertaken by a country and CX proves—if we prove the topic is bad that still doesn't disprove her advocacy.====
	12	+
	13	+
	14	+====C~~ Net benefits—====
	15	+
	16	+
	17	+====1~~ Debate requires a specific point of difference in order to promote effective exchange—stasis in the topic is key to engagement.====
	18	+Steinberg and Freeley 13, * David, Lecturer in Communicatio22n studies and rhetoric. Advisor to Miami Urban Debate League. Director of Debate at U Miami, Former President of CEDA. And ** Austin, attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, JD, Suffolk University, Argumentation and Debate, Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 121-4
	19	+Debate is a means of settling differences, so there must be a controversy,
	20	+AND
	21	+particular point of difference, which will be outlined in the following discussion.
	22	+
	23	+
	24	+====The impact outweighs—deliberative debate models impart skills vital to respond to social problems====
	25	+Christian O. Lundberg 10 Professor of Communications @ University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, "Tradition of Debate in North Carolina" in Navigating Opportunity: Policy Debate in the 21st Century By Allan D. Louden, p. 311
	26	+The second major problem with the critique that identifies a naivety in articulating debate and
	27	+AND
	28	+with the existential challenges to democracy ~~in an~~ increasingly complex world.
	29	+
	30	+
	31	+====Engaging the law through in-depth debate is critical to solve their impacts====
	32	+Harris 94, professor of law – UC Berkeley, '94 (Angela P., 82 Calif. L. Rev. 741)
	33	+CRT has taken up this method of internal critique. Like the crits, race
	34	+AND
	35	+not to topple the Enlightenment, but to make its promises real. n66
	36	+
	37	+
	38	+====T version of Aff solves====
	39	+
	40	+
	41	+====Drop the debater:====
	42	+
	43	+
	44	+====1~~ Time skew puts me at a disadvantage on substance.====
	45	+
	46	+
	47	+====2~~ Sets a precedent that debaters can't run unfair arguments.====
	48	+
	49	+
	50	+====3~~ Dropping them is key to rectify the abuse that has already occurred in the round.====
	51	+
	52	+
	53	+====Competing Interps over Reasonability:====
	54	+
	55	+
	56	+====1~~ No brightline, competing interps are the most fair as it comes down to who debated theory better.====
	57	+
	58	+
	59	+**====2~~ Competing interpretations creates an incentive to promote fair debate because it forces debaters to defend their interpretations.====**
	60	+
	61	+
	62	+====No RVIs:====
	63	+
	64	+
	65	+====1~~ It's reciprocal—they could run theory and generate offense on the same layer of debate. ====
	66	+
	67	+
	68	+====2~~ RVI's kill substance because it incentivizes both debaters to go all in on theory because it's the highest layer of the debate—outweighs because the topic only lasts two months. ====
	69	+
	70	+
	71	+====3~~ Chilling effect—discourages checking abuse because cheap debaters will prep out common interps.====

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-09-10 01:43:32.141

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Chris Castillo

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Edina GL

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Westwood Shhah Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Sept Oct ~-~- T ~-~- Defend Rez

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Grapevine