Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[49]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[49]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,31 +1,0 @@
1		-Interpretation: The aff must explicitly specify a comprehensive role of the ballot and clarify how the round will play out under that role of the ballot in the form of a delineated text in the 1AC To clarify, the aff must:
2		-1. Clarify how offense links back to the role of the ballot, such as whether post-fiat offense or pre-fiat offense matters and which comes first.
3		-2. Clarify what theoretical objections do and do not link to the aff, such as whether or not the aff comes before theory.
4		-3. Clarify how to weigh and compare between competing advocacies i.e. whether the role of the ballot is solely determined by the flow or another method of engagement.
5		-
6		-Violation: They don’t – that’s CX
7		-
8		-Standards:
9		-Clash –
10		-
11		-
12		-Voter:
13		-Substantive engagement
14		-1.
15		-2.
16		-3.
17		-
18		-Prefer competing interpretations:
19		-1.
20		-2.
21		-Drop the debater:
22		-1.
23		-2.
24		-3.
25		-
26		-RVI:
27		-1.
28		-2.
29		-3.
30		-4.
31		-5.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-12-16 22:43:23.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Aimun Khan

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Lake Highland Muhammed Khattak

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-29

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Westwood Mandavilli Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-3 - Theory - ROTB Spec

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Strake Jesuit